Teacher immediacy and learning mathematics: Effects on students with divergent mathematical aptitudes

References

• Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. F., & Andersen, J. (1982). Nonverbal immediacy in instruction. In L. Barker (Ed.), Communication in the classroom (pp. 98–120). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. F., Andersen, P. A., & Jensen, A. D. (1979). The measurement of nonverbal immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7(2), 153–180. doi:10.1080/00909887909365204
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. F., Norton, R. W., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1981). Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 30(4), 377–392. doi:10.1080/03634528109378493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). A taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2014). STEM: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/stem-execsum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(1), 59–68. doi:10.1080/03634520109379232
   Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340. doi:10.1080/03634529009378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J. W. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44(3), 251–266. doi:10.1080/03634529509379015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, T. P., & Rallis, S. F. (1991). Factors and influences on high school students’ career choices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(4), 281–292. doi:10.2307/749273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(293), 52–64. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (1993). The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation: Is it the same for all students? Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 454–464. doi:10.1080/01463379309369905
   Google Scholar
• Furlich, S. A., & Dwyer, J. (2007). Student motivation and instructor immediacy in community college mathematics classes. The Mathematics Educator, 10(2), 55–70. Retrieved from http://math.nie.edu.sg/ame/matheduc/tme/tmeV10_2/Article%20by%20Jerry%20et%20al.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40–53. doi:10.1080/03634528809378702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris Interactive. (2011). STEM perceptions: Student & parent study [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://news.microsoft.com/download/archived/presskits/citizenship/docs/STEMPerceptionsReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 681–704. doi:10.3102/00028312035004681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Wendt-Wasco, N. J. (1985). Teacher immediacy in divergent college classes. Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/01463378509369579
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37(3), 198–207. doi:10.1080/03634528809378719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424–430. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale & M. Brooks (Eds.), Speech Communication Association Summer Conference Proceedings: Assessing college student competence in speech communication. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, L. L., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2002). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Contributions from the discipline of communication. Communication Education, 51(4), 383–391. doi:10.1080/03634520216521
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. A. (2002). Relationships between teacher nonverbal immediacy, student emotional response, and perceived student learning. Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 77–88. doi:10.1080/08824090209384834
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Garza, R., Beebe, S. A., Houser, M. L., Jurrells, S., & Furler, L. (2008). Instructional communication predictors of ninth-grade students’ affective learning in math and science. Communication Education, 57(3), 333–355. doi:10.1080/03634520801989950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of instructional communication. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. F., & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53(2), 310–321. doi:10.2307/1128973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plax, P., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35(1), 43–55. doi:10.1080/03634528609388318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39(3), 181–195. doi:10.1080/03634529009378801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. (2003). Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51(4), 504–517. doi:10.1080/01463370309370170
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39(4), 341–353. doi:10.1080/03634529009378814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2001). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students’ affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(4), 327–342. doi:10.1080/03634520109379259
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184–207. doi:10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar