202
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Research projects and secondary mathematics pre-service teachers’ sense of efficacy

&

References

  • Albayrak, M., & Unal, Z. A. (2011). The effect of methods of teaching mathematics course on mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs of elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(16), 183–190.
  • Allinder, R. M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial & Special Education, 16, 247–254. doi:10.1177/074193259501600408
  • Ashton, P. T. (1985). Motivation and the teacher’s sense of efficacy. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 2, pp. 141–171). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bates, A. B., Latham, N., & Kim, J.-A. (2011). Linking preservice teachers’ mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics teaching efficacy to their mathematical performance. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 325–333. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00095.x
  • Black, R. (2006). Overcoming disadvantage through the innovative classroom. University of Melbourne: The Foundation for Young Australians. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494426.pdf
  • Black, R. (2007). Crossing the bridge: Overcoming entrenched disadvantage through student-centred learning. University of Melbourne: The Foundation for Young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.fya.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/black2007crossingthebridge.pdf
  • Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367–409. doi:10.3102/0034654308321455
  • Brown, A. B. (2012). Non-traditional preservice teachers and their mathematics efficacy beliefs. School Science and Mathematics, 112(3), 191–198. doi:10.1111/ssm.2012.112.issue-3
  • Cakiroglu, E. (2008). The teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers in the USA and Turkey. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34, 33–44. doi:10.1080/02607470701773457
  • Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 125–142. doi:10.1007/s10649-007-9084-2
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
  • Eddy, C., Jasper, W., Wilkerson, T., Sorto, M. A., Cooper, S., Ward, E. et al. (2014). A conceptual model for algebra teacher self-efficacy. In G. T. Matney & S. M. Che (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41th Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning. San Antonio, TX. Retrieved from http://www.rcml-math.org/assets/Proceedings/rcml%20proceedings%202014.pdf
  • Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–24.
  • Enochs, L., Smith, P., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194–202. doi:10.1111/ssm.2000.100.issue-4
  • Fisher, M. H. (2011). Factors influencing stress, burnout, and retention of secondary teachers. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/
  • Fleener, M. J., & Matney, G. (2007). Curriculum clearings as being-with mathematics experiences: Authentic learning through a Heideggerian lens. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 3(2), 92–106. doi:10.1080/15505170.2006.10411607
  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
  • Glickman, C., & Tamashiro, R. (1982). A comparison of first-year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving. Psychology in Schools, 19, 558–562. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(198210)19:4<558::AID-PITS2310190426>3.0.CO;2-F
  • Gresham, G. (2008). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy in elementary pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 19(3), 171–184. doi:10.1080/10476210802250133
  • Guarino, C. M., Santibanez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208. doi:10.3102/00346543076002173
  • Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(88)90025-X
  • Herrera, T., Kanold, T. D., Koss, R. K., Ryan, P., & Speer, W. R. (2007). Standards for teaching and learning mathematics. In T. S. Martin (Ed.), Mathematics teaching today (pp. 15–60). Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
  • Hipp, K. A., & Bredeson, P. V. (1995). Exploring connections between teacher efficacy and principals’ leadership behavior. Journal of School Leadership, 5(2), 136–150.
  • Hoy, A. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Organizational socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 279–300. doi:10.3102/00028312027002279
  • Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 355–372. doi:10.1086/461729
  • Huinker, D., & Madison, S. (1997). Preparing efficacious elementary teachers in science and mathematics: The influence of methods courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 107–126. doi:10.1023/A:1009466323843
  • Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. doi:10.3102/00028312038003499
  • Ingersoll, R., & Alsalam, N. (1997). Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis (NCES 97-069). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
  • Ingersoll, R. M., & Perda, D. (2009). The mathematics and science teacher shortage: Fact and myth (CPRE Research Report RR-62). Retrieved from Consortium for Policy Research in Education website: http://www.cpre.org/mathematics-and-science-teacher-shortage-fact-and-myth
  • Isiksal, M. (2010). The relationship among mathematics teaching efficacy, math anxiety, and mathematical self-concept: The case of Turkish pre-service elementary teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 501–514. doi:10.3860/taper.v19i3.1857
  • Johnson, S., & Birkeland, S. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581–617. doi:10.3102/00028312040003581
  • Kahle, D. K. (2008). How elementary school teachers’ mathematical self-efficacy and mathematics teaching self-efficacy relate to conceptually and procedurally oriented teaching practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Kannapel, P. J., & Clements, S. K. (2005). Inside the black box of high-performing high-poverty schools. Retrieved from http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/highperforminghighpoverty.pdf
  • Kersaint, G., Lewis, J., Potter, R., & Meisels, G. (2007). Why teachers leave: Factors that influence retention and resignation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 775–794. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.12.004
  • Kieftenbeld, V., Natesan, P., & Eddy, C. (2011). An item response theory analysis of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(5), 443–454. doi:10.1177/0734282910391062
  • Labone, E. (2004). Teacher efficacy: Maturing the construct through research in alternative paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 341–359. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.013
  • Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62. doi:10.3102/01623737024001037
  • Macdonald, D. (1999). Teacher attrition: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 835–848. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00031-1
  • Matney, G. (2004). The clearings of authentic learning in mathematics (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
  • Matney, G., & Jackson, J. (2010). The effective difference of research projects on secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ sense of efficacy. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning. Conway, AR.
  • Moon, B. (2007). Research analysis: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers: A global overview of current policies and practices. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
  • Moore, W., & Esselman, M. (1992, April). Teacher efficacy, power, school climate and achievement: A desegregating district’s experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Moseley, C., & Utley, J. (2006). The effect of an integrated science and mathematics content-based course on science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(2), 1–12. doi:10.1007/BF03174684
  • NCATE Blue Ribbon Panel. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation in Teacher Education.
  • Newman, F. M., Rutter, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62, 221–238. doi:10.2307/2112828
  • Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543
  • Parkay, F. W., Greenwood, G., Olejnik, S., & Proller, N. (1988). A study of the relationship among teacher efficacy, locus of control, and stress. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(4), 13–22.
  • Shernoff, E. S., Mehta, T. G., Atkins, M. S., Torf, R., & Spencer, J. (2011). A qualitative study of the sources and impact of stress among urban teachers. School Mental Health, 3, 59–69. doi:10.1007/s12310-011-9051-z
  • Siwatu, K. O. (2011). Preservice teachers’ sense of preparedness and self-efficacy to teach in America’s urban and suburban schools: Does context matter? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.004
  • Smith, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387–402. doi:10.2307/749874
  • Swars, S. K., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., & Hart, L. C. (2009). A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers’ mathematics beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 47–66. doi:10.1007/s10857-008-9092-x
  • Swars, S. L., Daane, C. J., & Giesen, J. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy: What is the relationship in elementary preservice teachers? School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 306–315. doi:10.1111/ssm.2006.106.issue-7
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
  • Utley, J., Moseley, C., & Bryant, R. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 82–87. doi:10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-2
  • Vinson, B. M. (1995). A comparison of sense of efficacy before and after clinical experience for pre-student-teaching novices in an elementary methods program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS.
  • Ward, E. K. (2009). Latent transition analysis of pre-service teachers’ efficacy in science and mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
  • Ward, E. K., & Johnston, E. (2014). A framework for revising the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. In G. T. Matney & S. M. Che (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41th Annual Meeting of the Research Council On Mathematics Learning. San Antonio, TX: Research Council on Mathematics Learning. Retrieved from http://www.rcml-math.org/assets/Proceedings/rcml%20proceedings%202014.pdf
  • Webb, P. T. (2006). The stress of accountability: Teachers as policy brokers in a poverty school. In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability (pp. 1–18). USA: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  • Weiss, N. A. (2012). Introductory Statistics (9th ed., pp. 358–510). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 243–356.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.