Reconsidering the role of disembedding in multiplicative concepts: Extending theory from the process of developing a quantitative measure

References

• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colleague1, Author, & Colleague3. (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Colleague1, Colleague3, Colleague4, Colleague5, & Author. (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Colleague2 & Author. (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Mason, OH: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J. (2007). Units coordination and construction of improper fractions: A revision of the splitting hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 27–47. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 383–432. doi:10.1080/07370008.2010.511565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J., & Tillema, E. S. (2009). Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts: A critical constructive resource for fraction composition schemes. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., Kosko, K. W., & Dimmel, J. K. (2013). How are geometric proof problems presented? Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ recognition of the diagrammatic register. In M. Martinez, & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 179–186). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., Dimmel, J., Erickson, A., Ko, I., & Kosko, K. W. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ recognition of an obligation to the discipline and its role in the justification of instructional actions. In S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, & D. Allan. (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 3, pp. 273–280). Vancouver, Canada: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., Blunk, M., Goffney, I. M., & Rowan, B. (2007). Validating the ecological assumption: The relationship of measure scores to classroom teaching and student learning. Measurement, 5(2), 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., Jacobson, E., de Araujo, Z., & Orrill, C. H. (2012). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching fractions with drawn quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 391–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Where’s the evidence? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 421–427. doi:10.2307/749702
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K. W. (in review). A multiplicative reasoning assessment for fourth and fifth graders.
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K. W., & Herbst, P. (2012). Evaluating teachers’ decisions in posing a proof problem. In L. R. Van Zoest, J. J. Lo, & J. L. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 813–820), Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Boyce, S., Phillips, N., Anwyll, T., Ulrich, C., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2015). A written instrument for assessing students’ units coordination structures. Mathematics Education, 10(2), 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2009). A quantitative analysis of children’s splitting operations and fraction schemes. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28, 150–161. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2010). Students’ partitive reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(4), 181–194. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Olive, J. (2001). Children’s number sequences: An explanation of Steffe’s constructs and an extrapolation to rational numbers of arithmetic. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., & Kosko, K. W. (2016). Elementary students’ understanding of equivalence and multiplicative reasoning. Poster presented at the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tuscan, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1992). Schemes of action and operation involving composite units. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(3), 259–309. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(92)90005-Y
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1994). Children’s multiplying schemes. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 3–39). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, E. S. (2013). Relating one and two-dimensional quantities: Students’ multiplicative reasoning in combinatorial and spatial contexts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 331–352. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.03.006
   Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Sensory experience, abstraction, and teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 369–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M., & Norton, A. (2011). The splitting loope. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(4), 386–416.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M., Norton, A., & Boyce, S. J. (2013). Validating a written instrument for assessing students’ fractions schemes and operations. The Mathematics Educator, 22(2), 32–54.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar