References
- Anthony, G., Hunter, J., Hunter, R., & Duncan, S. (2015). Prospective teachers’ development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.010
- Aragon-Mendizabal, E., Aguilar-Villagran, M., Navarro-Guzman, J. I., & Howell, R. (2017). Improving number sense in kindergarten children with low achievement in mathematics. Annals of Psychology, 33(2), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.2.239391
- Aunio, P., & Mononen, R. (2017). The effects of educational computer game on low-performing children’s early numeracy skills – An intervention study in a preschool setting. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(5), 677-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1412640
- Baroody, A. J., Bajwa, N. P., & Eiland, M. (2009). Why can’t Johnny remember the basic facts? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.v15:1
- Baroody, A. J., Eiland, M., & Thompson, B. (2009). Fostering at-risk preschoolers’ number sense. Early Education & Development, 20(1), 80–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802206619
- Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115–131. doi: 10.2307/30034952
- Baroody, A. J., & Rosu, L. (2006, April). Adaptive expertise with basic addition and subtraction combinations: The number sense view. Symposium at the annual meeting f the American Educational Research Association [Paper presented]. San Francisco, CA.
- Cason, M., Young, J., & Kuehnert, E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of numerical competency development on achievement: Recommendations for mathematics educators. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1425591
- Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://corestandards.org
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
- Diezmann, C. M., & Lowrie, T. (2006). Primary students’ knowledge of and errors on number lines. The 29th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 171–178). MERGA.
- Dyson, N., Jordan, N. C., Beliakoff, A., & Hassinger-Das, B. (2015). A kindergarten number-sense intervention with contrasting practice conditions for low-achieving children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 331–370. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0331
- Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 225–256). Information Age Publishing.
- Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Powell, S. R. (2003). Grade 3 math battery. Peabody, Vanderbilt University.
- Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510
- Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., & Hoard, M. K. (2009). Predicting mathematical achievement and mathematical learning disability with a simple screening tool: The Number Sets Test. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330592
- Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS One, 8(1), e54651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
- Geary, D. C., & vanMarle, K. (2016). Young children’s core symbolic and nonsymbolic quantitative knowledge in the prediction of later mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2130–2144. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000214
- Geary, D. C., vanMarle, K., Chu, F. W., Rouder, J., Hoard, M. K., & Nugent, L. (2018). Early conceptual understanding of cardinality predicts superior school-entry number-system knowledge. Psychological Science, 29(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617729817
- Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1457–1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012682
- Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027002111
- Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning & Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004
- Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009, July). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 12–30). MERGA.
- Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129–141). Springer.
- Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Chan Torrou, A., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
- Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331037
- Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/749607
- Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544
- National Research Council. (2006) . Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K–12 curriculum. The National Academies Press.
- Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79(2), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01131.x
- Saldaña, J. (2009). An introduction to codes and coding. In The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.2004.75.issue-2
- Siegler, R. S., & Braithwaite, D. W. (2017). Numerical development. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044101
- Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
- Starkey, G. S., & McCandliss, B. D. (2014). The emergence of “groupitizing” in children’s numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.006
- Taylor, K. L., & Dionne, J. P. (2000). Assessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.413