Building detection in multi-source aerial data with imbalanced training samples: an approach based on the Bayesian Vector Quantizer

References

• Alonso, M. and Malpica, J., 2008. Classification of multispectral high-resolution satellite imagery using lidar elevation data. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5359 LNCS (PART 2), 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Awrangjeb, M. and Fraser, C., 2014. Automatic segmentation of raw lidar data for extraction of building roofs. Remote Sensing, 6 (5), 3716–3751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awrangjeb, M., Zhang, C., and Fraser, C., 2012. Building detection in complex scenes thorough effective separation of buildings from trees. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 78 (7), 729–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awrangjeb, M., Zhang, C., and Fraser, C., 2013. Automatic extraction of building roofs using lidar data and multispectral imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 83, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini, A., et al., 2010. Pixel, object and hybrid classification comparisons. Journal of Spatial Science, 55 (1), 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bork, E. and Su, J., 2007. Integrating lidar data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: a meta analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 111 (1), 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossard, M., Feranec, J., and Otahel, J., 2000. CORINE land cover technical guide – addendum 2000. European Environment Agency, 40. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/tech40add [Accessed May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Bouziani, M., Gota, K., and He, D.C., 2010. Automatic change detection of buildings in urban environment from very high spatial resolution images using existing geo-database and prior knowledge. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (1), 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, N.V., 2005. Data mining for imbalanced datasets: an overview. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., et al., 2011. 3d building model reconstruction from multi-view aerial imagery and lidar data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 77 (2), 125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37 (1), 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cover, T.M. and Hart, P.E., 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13 (1), 21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantini, C., Gemelli, A., and Potena, D., 2010. Feature ranking based on decision border. In: 20th international conference on pattern recognition, ICPR 2010, 23–26 August 2010 Istanbul, 609–612. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2010.154
   Google Scholar
• Diamantini, C., Gemelli, A., and Potena, D., 2015. A geometric approach to feature ranking based upon results of effective decision boundary feature matrix. In: Feature selection for data and pattern recognition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 45–69. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45620-0_4
   Google Scholar
• Diamantini, C. and Potena, D., 2009. Bayes vector quantizer for class-imbalance problem. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21 (5), 638–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantini, C. and Spalvieri, A., 1998. Quantizing for minimum average misclassification risk. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9 (1), 174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingos, P., 1999. Metacost: a general method for making classifiers cost-sensitive. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. New York, NY: ACM, 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A., et al., 2013. Analysing the classification of imbalanced data-sets with multiple classes: binarization techniques and ad-hoc approaches. Knowledge-Based Systems, 42, 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlani, G., et al., 2006. Complete classification of raw lidar data and 3d reconstruction of buildings. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 8 (4), 357–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlani, G., Roncella, R., and Nardinocchi, C., 2015. Where is photogrammetry heading to? State of the art and trends. Rendiconti Lincei, 26, 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, Y. and Schapire, R.E., 1996. Game theory, on-line prediction and boosting. In: Proceedings of the ninth annual conference on computational learning theory. New York, NY: ACM Press, 325–332. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/238061.238163
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R., 2000. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. The Annals of Statistics, 38 (2), 337–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerke, M. and Xiao, J., 2014. Fusion of airborne laserscanning point clouds and images for supervised and unsupervised scene classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87, 78–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Aguilera, D., et al., 2013. Automated urban analysis based on lidar-derived building models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51 (3), 1844–1851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., et al., 2011. Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for urban scene classi_cation using random forests. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66 (1), 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., et al., 2014. Road centerline extraction in complex urban scenes from lidar data based on multiple features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52 (11), 7448–7456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., et al., 2013. Toward automatic estimation of urban green volume using airborne lidar data and high resolution remote sensing images. Frontiers of Earth Science, 7 (1), 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, Y., Quackenbush, L., and Im, J., 2010. Synergistic use of quickbird multispectral imagery and lidar data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114 (6), 1141–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshelham, K., et al., 2010. Performance evaluation of automated approaches to building detection in multi-source aerial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (1), 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshelham, K., Nedkov, S., and Nardinocchi, C., 2008. A comparison of bayesian and evidence-based fusion methods for automated building detection in aerial data. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37, 1183–1188.
   Google Scholar
• Malpica, J., et al., 2013. Change detection of buildings from satellite imagery and lidar data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34 (5), 1652–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor, A., et al., 2015. Exploring issues of training data imbalance and mislabelling on random forest performance for large area land cover classification using the ensemblemargin. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 105, 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, J., Rottensteiner, F., and Soergel, U., 2014. Contextual classification of lidar data and building object detection in urban areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87, 152–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oude Elberink, S. and Vosselman, G., 2011. Quality analysis on 3d building models reconstructed from airborne laser scanning data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66 (2), 157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, J.R., 2014. C4. 5: programs for machine learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. ISBN 978-0-08-050058-4
   Google Scholar
• Rebelo, C., Rodrigues, A.M., Tenedório, J.A., Goncalves, J.A., and Marnoto, J. 2015. Building 3d city models: testing and comparing laser scanning and low-cost uav data using foss technologies. In: Computational science and its applications, ICCSA 2015, vol. 9157 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 367–379.
   Google Scholar
• Rottensteiner, F., et al., 2005. Using the dempster shafer method for the fusion of LIDAR data and multi-spectral images for building detection. Information Fusion, 6 (4), 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Schapire, R.E. and Singer, Y., 1998. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence- rated predictions. In: Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on computational learning theory, COLT’ 98. New York: ACM, 80–91. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/279943.279960 [Accessed May 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov, E. and Kaptein, A., 2006. Theoretical and experimental study of a meta-typicalness approach for reliable classification. In: Proceedings on IEEE international conference on data mining, ICDM. Washington, DC: IEEE, 739–743. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2006.158
   Google Scholar
• Syed, S., Dare, P., and Jones, S., 2005. Automatic classification of land cover features with high resolution imagery and lidar data: an object oriented approach. In: Proceedings of SSC2005 spatial intelligence, innovation and praxis: the national biennial conference of the spatial sciences institute, September, 2005. Melbourne: Spatial Sciences Institute. ISBN 0-9581366-2-9.
   Google Scholar
• Tahir, M., Kittler, J., and Yan, F., 2012. Inverse random under sampling for class imbalance problem and its application to multi-label classification. Pattern Recognition, 45 (10), 3738–3750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, J., Cui, S., and Reinartz, P., 2014. Building change detection based on satellite stereo imagery and digital surface models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52 (1), 406–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turker, M. and Koc-San, D., 2015. Building extraction from high-resolution optical spaceborne images using the integration of support vector machine (svm) classification, hough transformation and perceptual grouping. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 34, 58–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., 2013. 3d building modeling using images and lidar: a review. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 4 (4), 273–292.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G.M. and Provost, F., 2003. Learning when training data are costly: the effect of class distribution on tree induction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 19 (1), 315–354.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, J., et al., 2015. Automatic construction of 3-d building model from airborne lidar data through 2-d snake algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53 (1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., et al., 2010. Automated derivation of urban building density information using airborne lidar data and object- based method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 98 (3–4), 210–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., et al., 2002. Urban land-use classification using integrated airborn laser scanning data and high resolution multispectral imagery. Pecora 15/Land Satellite Information IV/ISPRS Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Lin, X., and Ning, X., 2013. Svm-based classification of segmented airborne lidar point clouds in urban areas. Remote Sensing, 5 (8), 3749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, G. and Zhou, X., 2014. Seamless fusion of lidar and aerial imagery for building extraction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52 (11), 7393–7407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar