Increasing pressure on US men for income in order to find a spouse

References

• Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2 (3):349–68. doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betzig, L. L. 1986. Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. Milton Park, UK: Aldine Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Barthold, J. A., Myrskylä, M., & Jones, O. R. 2012. Childlessness drives the sex difference in the association between income and reproductive success of modern Europeans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33 (6): 628-638.
   Google Scholar
• Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1988. Reproductive success in three Kipsigis cohorts. In Reproductive Success, 419–38. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branigan, A. R., K. J. McCallum, and J. Freese. 2013. Variation in the heritability of educational attainment: An international meta-analysis. Social Forces 92 (1):109–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. C., D. Russo-Batterham, and K. R. Blake. 2022. Incel activity on social media linked to local mating ecology. Psychological Science 33 (2):249–58. doi:10.1177/09567976211036065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzozowska, Z., E. Beaujouan, and K. Zeman. 2022. Is two still best? Change in parity-specific fertility across education in low-fertility countries. Population Research and Policy Review 41 (5):2085–114. doi:10.1007/s11113-022-09716-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulanda, J. R., and S. L. Brown. 2007. Race-ethnic differences in marital quality and divorce. Social Science Research 36 (3):945–67. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., T. K. Shackelford, L. A. Kirkpatrick, and R. J. Larsen. 2001. A half century of mate preferences: the cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage & Family 63 (2):491–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chagnon, N. A. 1988. Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239 (4843):985–92. doi:10.1126/science.239.4843.985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. 2008. A farewell to alms. Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781400827817.
   Google Scholar
• Cronk, L. 1989. Low socioeconomic status and female‐biased parental investment: the Mukogodo example. American Anthropologist 91 (2):414–29. doi:10.1525/aa.1989.91.2.02a00090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engzell, P., and F. C. Tropf. 2019. Heritability of education rises with intergenerational mobility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (51):25386–88. doi:10.1073/pnas.1912998116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieder, M., and S. Huber. 2007. The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (6):392–98. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieder, M., and S. Huber. 2020. Effects of wife’s and husband’s income on wife’s reproduction: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Biodemography and Social Biology 65 (1):31–40. doi:10.1080/19485565.2019.1689351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieder, M., and S. Huber. 2022. Contemporary selection pressures in modern societies? Which factors best explain variance in human reproduction and mating?. Evolution and Human Behavior 43 (1):16–25. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieder, M., S. Huber, and F. L. Bookstein. 2011. Socioeconomic status, marital status and childlessness in men and women: An analysis of census data from six countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 43 (5):619–35. doi:10.1017/S002193201100023X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieder, M., S. Huber, F. L. Bookstein, K. Iber, K. Schäfer, G. Winckler, and B. Wallner. 2005. Status and reproduction in humans: new evidence for the validity of evolutionary explanations on basis of a university sample. Ethology 111 (10):940–50. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01129.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, E. J., M. D. Neville, K. E. Samocha, K. Barclay, M. Kolk, M. E. Niemi, G. Kirov, H. C. Martin, and M. E. Hurles. 2022. Reduced reproductive success is associated with selective constraint on human genes. Nature 603 (7903):858–63. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04549-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, C. 2021. Career and family. Career and Family, Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691226736
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, A., and I. Koupil. 2010. The effect of school performance upon marriage and long-term reproductive success in 10,000 Swedish males and females born 1915–1929. Evolution and Human Behavior 31 (6):425–35. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P. 2009. Who Marries and When?: Age at First Marriage in the United States, 2002. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Gurven, M., and C. Von Rueden. 2006. Hunting, social status and biological fitness. Biodemography and Social Biology 53 (1–2):81–99. doi:10.1080/19485565.2006.9989118.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, K. B., and S. R. Hayford. 2020. Pathways to parenthood in social and family contexts: decade in review, 2020. Journal of Marriage & Family 82 (1):117–44. doi:10.1111/jomf.12618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J., and D. Hruschka. 2020. Disentangling wealth effects on fertility in 64 low-and middle-income countries. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2:e58. doi:10.1017/ehs.2020.62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasell, J., S. Morelli, and M. Roser. 2019. Recent trends in educing social inequalities in cancer: evidence and priorities for research, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Eds.: Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Saracci R., 2019, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, K. 2019. Why do men hunt? Benefits for risky choices. In Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant economies, 145–66. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B., J. Ware, and E. Shapiro. 2020. Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 43 (7):565–87. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopcroft, R. L. 2006. Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2):104–20. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopcroft, R. L. 2015. Sex differences in the relationship between status and number of offspring in the contemporary US. Evolution and Human Behavior 36 (2):146–51. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopcroft, R. L. 2021. High income men have high value as long-term mates in the US: Personal income and the probability of marriage, divorce, and childbearing in the US. Evolution and Human Behavior 42 (5):409–17. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, S., F. L. Bookstein, and M. Fieder. 2010. Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: an evolutionary perspective. American Journal of Human Biology 22 (5):578–87. doi:10.1002/ajhb.21048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irons, W. 1979. Natural selection, adaptation, and human social behavior. In Eds: N. Chagnon & W. Irons Evolutionary Biology and Human Behavior, 4–39. Duxbury, Boston, MA
   Google Scholar
• Jalovaara, M., G. Neyer, G. Andersson, J. Dahlberg, L. Dommermuth, P. Fallesen, and T. Lappegård. 2019. Education, gender, and cohort fertility in the Nordic countries. European Journal of Population 35 (3):563–86. doi:10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, M. 2022. The relationship between life-course accumulated income and childbearing of Swedish men and women born 1940–70. Population Studies 1–19. doi:10.1080/00324728.2022.2134578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, M., and K. Barclay. 2021. Do income and marriage mediate the relationship between cognitive ability and fertility? Data from Swedish taxation and conscriptions registers for men born 1951–1967. Intelligence 84:101514. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koropeckyj-Cox, T., and V. R. Call. 2007. Characteristics of older childless persons and parents: cross-national comparisons. Journal of Family Issues 28 (10):1362–414. doi:10.1177/0192513X07303837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, B., R. McQuaid, A. Munro, and P. Dabir‐Alai. 2012. Motherhood and its impact on career progression. Gender in Management: An International Journal 27 (5):346–64. doi:10.1108/17542411211252651.
   Google Scholar
• Mealey, L. 1985. The relationship between social status and biological success: A case study of the Mormon religious hierarchy. Ethology and Sociobiology 6 (4):249–57. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(85)90017-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., P. C. Johnson, and H. Schielzeth. 2017. The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 14 (134):20170213. doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., H. Schielzeth, and R. B. O’Hara. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4 (2):133–42. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettle, D., and T. V. Pollet. 2008. Natural selection on male wealth in humans. The American Naturalist 172 (5):658–66. doi:10.1086/591690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisén, J., P. Martikainen, M. Myrskylä, and K. Silventoinen. 2018. Education, other socioeconomic characteristics across the life course, and fertility among Finnish men. European Journal of Population 34 (3):337–66. doi:10.1007/s10680-017-9430-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisén, J., P. Martikainen, K. Silventoinen, and M. Myrskylä. 2014. Age-specific fertility by educational level in the Finnish male cohort born 1940–1950. Demographic Research 31:119–36. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, R. L., K. Holt, and T. J. Holt. 2020. An exploration of the involuntary celibate (incel) subculture online. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37 (7–8):NP4981–NP5008. doi:10.1177/0886260520959625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomin, R., and S. Von Stumm. 2018. The new genetics of intelligence. Nature Reviews Genetics 19 (3):148–59. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, S. C., S. G. Byars, D. R. Govindaraju, and D. Ewbank. 2010. Measuring selection in contemporary human populations. Nature Reviews Genetics 11 (9):611–22. doi:10.1038/nrg2831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven Ruggles, Sarah Flood, Matthew Sobek, Danika Brockman, Grace Cooper, Stephanie Richards, and Megan Schouweiler. 2023. IPUMS USA: Version 13.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. doi:10.18128/D010.V13.0.
   Google Scholar
• Stulp, G., M. J. Simons, S. Grasman, and T. V. Pollet. 2017. Assortative mating for human height: A meta‐analysis. American Journal of Human Biology 29 (1):e22917. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torr, B. M. 2011. The changing relationship between education and marriage in the United States, 1940–2000. Journal of Family History 36 (4):483–503. doi:10.1177/0363199011416760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voland, E. 1990. Differential reproductive success within the Krummhörn population (Germany, 18th and 19th centuries). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26 (1):65–72. doi:10.1007/BF00174026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Rueden, C., M. Gurven, and H. Kaplan. 2008. The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior 29 (6):402–15. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Rueden, C., M. Gurven, and H. Kaplan. 2011. Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278 (1715):2223–32. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Rueden, C. R., and A. V. Jaeggi. 2016. Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (39):10824–29. doi:10.1073/pnas.1606800113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stumm, S., and R. Plomin. 2021. Using DNA to predict intelligence. Intelligence 86:101530. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden, J., M. J. Abrams, M. C. Green, and J. Sabini. 2006. Do high-status people really have fewer children?. Human Nature 17 (4):377–92. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1001-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and P. Santtila. 2022. Social status predicts different mating and reproductive success for men and women in China: Evidence from the 2010–2017 CGSS data. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 76 (7):101. doi:10.1007/s00265-022-03209-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar