Business Architect: A Critical Role in Enterprise Transformation

REFERENCES

• Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.E. (1972). On purposeful systems. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bayens, G. (2012). Bedrijfsarchitectuur in de praktijk (Business architecture in practice). In F. Baldinger, D. Rijsenbrij (Eds.), State of the Art Architecture 2012, 10 Year NAF. Groningen, The Netherlands: Netherlands Architecture Forum, Line UP boek en media bv.
   Google Scholar
• Beijer, B., and de Klerk, T. (2010). IT architecture, essential practice for IT business solutions. Retrieved from Lulu.com
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, A.C., and Zmud, R.W. (1984). An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Management Review, 25(4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Business Architecture Guild. (2012). Business architecture handbook: Body of knowledge™, . version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.businessarchitectureguild.org/Resources/Documents/Section_1_Introd-uction%20Handbook_2.0_public%20version_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P.A. H. (1998). Information, systems and information systems. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series, 4(16), 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, R.D. (1961). Management information crisis. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T.H., Hammer, M., and Metisto, T.J. (1989). How executives can shape their company's information systems. Harvard Business Review, 67(2), 130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveleens, J., and Verhoef, C. (2010). The rise and fall of the chaos report figures. IEEE Computer Society, 27(1), 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technology Review, 73(3), 52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharajedaghi, J. (1999). Systems thinking, managing chaos and complexity, a platform for designing business architecture. USA: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Harishankar, R., Holley, K., Sanz, J., Giesen, E., Daley, K., Antoun, S., Ibrahim, M., Botros, A., Vaidya, S., and High, R. (2010). Actionable business architecture. IBM White Paper, IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickx, H.H. M. (2004 and 2005). Business architecture module, Six Lectures in Master Post-Doctoral Course “Architecture in a Digital World”, Capgemini in collaboration with University of Nijmegen, Utrecht, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickx, H.H. M. (2007). Governance in the practice of the CIO. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tilburg, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickx, H.H. M. (2010). Nobel Prize case—from controlled language to traceable requirements. The Open Group Conference, Amsterdam, 18–22 October, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickx, H. H. M., Daley, S. K., Mahakena, M., and von Rosing, M. (2011). The profession of the Business Architect. IEEE Conference, Luxembourg, 5–7 September.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., and Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472–484.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickx, H.H. M. (1991). Business strategy for 6 business units (Internal BU Reports). Netherlands: Philips Electronics NV.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2010). CEO study 2010, IBM Institute for business value. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2011). CIO study 2011, IBM Institute for business value. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services.
   Google Scholar
• Kotnour, T. (2011). An emerging theory of enterprise transformations. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 1, 48–69.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, R. (1999). Reconsidering information management through a generic framework (Primavera Working Paper). Netherlands: University of Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://primavera.fee.uva.nl/PDFdocs/99-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDavid, D. (1999). A standard for business architecture description. IBM Systems Journal, 38(1), 12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands Architecture Forum (Nederlands Architectuur Forum; NAF). (2012). State-of-the-art architecture 2012. In F. Baldinger and D. Rijsenbrij (Eds.), 10 year NAF, LINE UP and media bv. Groningen, Netherlands: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OMG. (2009). Defining requirements for a business architecture standard (Draft 5, 1 October). Retrieved from http://bawg.omg.org/Bus_Arch_Ecosystem_White_Paper_Draft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Smith, A., and 470 Practitioners from 45 Countries. (2010). Business model generation. USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, November–December, 62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• PRISM. (1986). Dispersion and interconnection: approaches to distributed systems architecture (Final Report). Cambridge, MA: CSC Index, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rijsenbrij, D., and Baldinger, F. (2012). Trends and issues in architecture. In Baldinger, F., and Rijsenbrij, D. (Eds.), State of the art in architecture 2012, 533–544. Groningen, The Netherlands: Netherlands Architecture Forum Line UP and media bv.
   Google Scholar
• Purchase, V., Parry, G., Valerdi, R., Nightingale, D., and Mills, J. (2011). Enterprise Transformation: Why are we interested, what is it, and what are the challenges? Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 1, 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Seligmann, P.S., Wijers, G.M., and Sol, H.G. (1989). Analyzing the structure of I.S. methodologies. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1961). Administrative behavior (2nd ed). New York: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1802). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, in three volumes, (10th ed.), London: A. Strahan.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. (2000). Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• The Open Group. (2009–2011). TOGAF version 9.1, (Open Group Standard; Document G116), Personal PDF Edition. USA: The Open Group.
   Google Scholar
• The Open Group. (n.d.). ArchiMate ® 2.0 specification, 2009–2012. . Technical Standard, ISBN: 1-937218-00-3, document number C118, Personal PDF Edition. USA: The Open Group.
   Google Scholar
• The Standish Group International. (1994). The chaos report (Technical Report). Retrieved from: http://www.csus.edu/indiv/v/velianitis/161/ChaosReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tillquist, J., King, J.L., and Woo, C. (2002). A representational scheme for analyzing information technology and organizational dependency. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 91–118.
   Google Scholar
• van der Sande, W., and Sturm, B. (2000). Information architecture, De Infrastructurele Benadering (Information architecture, the infrastructural approach). The Netherlands: Veenman Drukkers.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., and McGrath, D.J. (2008). Business-IT alignment in a network-era: Opportunities & challenges. EIS Conference, Tilburg, The Netherlands, May 22.
   Google Scholar
• Versteeg, G., and Bouwman, H. (2006). Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 91–102. doi 10.1007/s10796-006-7973-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagter, R., Witte, D., and van der Valk, L. (2012). Waarde van sturen op samenhang via recursiviteit en projectie (Value of “governance through coherence” via recursivity and projection). In Baldinger, F., and Rijsenbrij, D. (Eds.), State of the Art architecture 2012, 41–60. . Groningen, The Netherlands: Netherlands Architecture Forum, Line UP and media bv.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfenden, P.J., and Welch, D.E. (2000). Business architecture: A holistic approach to defining the organization necessary to deliver a strategy. Knowledge and Process Management, 7(2), 97–106.
   Google Scholar
• van't Wout, J., Waage, M., Hartman, H., Stahlecker, M., and Hofman, A. (2010). The integrated architecture framework explained, why, what, how. Heidelberg: Capgemini/Springer.
   Google Scholar