Statistical normalization methods in microbiome data with application to microbiome cancer research

References

• Hong M, Tao S, Zhang L, Diao L-T, Huang X, Huang S, Xie S-J, Xiao Z-D, Zhang H, RNA sequencing: new technologies and applications in cancer research. J Hematol Oncol 2020, 13 (1), 1–41. doi:10.1186/s13045-020-01005-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn H, Min K, Lee E, Kim H, Kim S, Kim Y, Kim G, Cho B, Jeong C, Kim Y, Whole-transcriptome sequencing reveals characteristics of cancer microbiome in Korean patients with GI tract cancer: fusobacterium nucleatum as a Therapeutic target. Microorganisms 2022, 10 (10), 1896. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10101896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome RC, Yang Y, Jobin C, The microbiome, gastrointestinal cancer, and immunotherapy. J Gastroen Hepatol 2022, 37 (2), 263–272. doi:10.1111/jgh.15742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayi TA, Cantrell S, Spann A, Garman KS, Leong JM, Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal cancer: links to microbes and the microbiome. PLoS Pathog 2018, 14 (12), e1007384. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart OA, Wu F, Chen Y, The role of gastric microbiota in gastric cancer. Gut Microbes 2020, 11 (5), 1220–1230. doi:10.1080/19490976.2020.1762520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janney A, Powrie F, Mann EH, Host–microbiota maladaptation in colorectal cancer. Nature 2020, 585 (7826), 509–517. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2729-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Wang X, Zhou X, Zhao J, Yang H, Wang S, Morse MA, Wu J, Yuan Y, Li S, Blood microbiota diversity determines response of advanced colorectal cancer to chemotherapy combined with adoptive T cell immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2021, 10 (1), 1976953. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2021.1976953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Gharaibeh RZ, Newsome RC, Jobin C, Amending microbiota by targeting intestinal inflammation with TNF blockade attenuates development of colorectal cancer. Nature Cancer 2020, 1 (7), 723–734. doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0078-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riquelme E, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Montiel M, Zoltan M, Dong W, Quesada P, Sahin I, Chandra V, San Lucas A, et al., Tumor microbiome diversity and composition influence pancreatic cancer outcomes. Cell 2019, 178 (4), 795–806.e12. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller LT, Barzily-Rokni M, Danino T, Jonas OH, Shental N, Nejman D, Gavert N, Zwang Y, Cooper ZA, Shee K, Potential role of intratumor bacteria in mediating tumor resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. Sci 2017, 357 (6356), 1156–1160. doi:10.1126/science.aah5043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakladar J, Kuo SZ, Castaneda G, Li WT, Gnanasekar A, Yu MA, Chang EY, Wang XQ, Ongkeko WM, The pancreatic microbiome is associated with carcinogenesis and worse prognosis in males and smokers. Cancers 2020, 12 (9), 2672. doi:10.3390/cancers12092672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponziani FR, Bhoori S, Castelli C, Putignani L, Rivoltini L, Del Chierico F, Sanguinetti M, Morelli D, Paroni Sterbini F, Petito V, Hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with gut microbiota profile and inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2019, 69 (1), 107–120. doi:10.1002/hep.30036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Li A, Jiang J, Zhou L, Yu Z, Lu H, Xie H, Chen X, Shao L, Zhang R, Gut microbiome analysis as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2019, 68 (6), 1014–1023. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behary J, Amorim N, Jiang X-T, Raposo A, Gong L, McGovern E, Ibrahim R, Chu F, Stephens C, Jebeili H, et al., Gut microbiota impact on the peripheral immune response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun 2021, 12 (1), 187. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20422-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Fang Z, Xue Y, Zhang J, Zhu J, Gao R, Yao S, Ye Y, Wang S, Lin C, Specific gut microbiome signature predicts the early-stage lung cancer. Gut Microbes 2020, 11 (4), 1030–1042. doi:10.1080/19490976.2020.1737487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Liao M, Yao Z, Liang W, Li Q, Liu J, Yang H, Ji Y, Wei W, Tan A, Breast cancer in postmenopausal women is associated with an altered gut metagenome. Microbiome 2018, 6 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0515-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liss MA, White JR, Goros M, Gelfond J, Leach R, Johnson-Pais T, Lai Z, Rourke E, Basler J, Ankerst D, et al., Metabolic biosynthesis pathways identified from fecal microbiome associated with prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2018, 74 (5), 575–582. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, Reuben A, Andrews M, Karpinets T, Prieto P, Vicente D, Hoffman K, Wei SC, Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Sci 2018, 359 (6371), 97–103. doi:10.1126/science.aan4236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson V, Fessler J, Bao R, Chongsuwat T, Zha Y, Alegre M-L, Luke JJ, Gajewski TF, The commensal microbiome is associated with anti–PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Sci 2018, 359 (6371), 104–108. doi:10.1126/science.aao3290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CP, Alou MT, Daillère R, Fluckiger A, Messaoudene M, Rauber C, Roberti MP, Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Sci 2018, 359 (6371), 91–97. doi:10.1126/science.aan3706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Chen DG, Bioinformatic analysis of microbiome data. Stat Anal Of Microbiome Data With R. Singapore: Springer; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3_1
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Statistical data analysis of microbiomes and metabolomics. American Chemical Society, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, Clardy J, Goodman RM, Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol 1998, 5 (10), R245–R249. doi:10.1016/S1074-5521(98)90108-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raes J, Foerstner KU, Bork P, Get the most out of your metagenome: computational analysis of environmental sequence data. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007, 10 (5), 490–498. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam SJ, Putnam N, Preston CM, Detter JC, Rokhsar D, Richardson PM, DeLong EF, Reverse methanogenesis: testing the hypothesis with environmental genomics. Sci 2004, 305 (5689), 1457–1462. doi:10.1126/science.1100025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson GW, Chapman J, Hugenholtz P, Allen EE, Ram RJ, Richardson PM, Solovyev VV, Rubin EM, Rokhsar DS, Banfield JF, Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 2004, 428 (6978), 37–43. doi:10.1038/nature02340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, Eisen JA, Wu D, Paulsen I, Nelson KE, Nelson W, Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea. Sci 2004, 304 (5667), 66–74. doi:10.1126/science.1093857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpton TJ, An introduction to the analysis of shotgun metagenomic data. Front Plant Sci 2014, 5, 209. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloss PD, Handelsman J, Metagenomics for studying unculturable microorganisms: cutting the gordian knot. Genome Biol 2005, 6 (8), 1–4. doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-8-229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertsen M, Hugenholtz P, Skarshewski A, Nielsen KL, Tyson GW, Nielsen PH, Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat Biotechnol 2013, 31 (6), 533–538. doi:10.1038/nbt.2579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczynski J, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Parfrey LW, Clemente JC, Gevers D, Knight R, Experimental and analytical tools for studying the human microbiome. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13 (1), 47–58. doi:10.1038/nrg3129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulund F, Sjören A, Kristiansson E, Tentacle: distributed quantification of genes in metagenomes. GigaScience 2015, 4 (1), s13742-015-0078–1. doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0078-1
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, An integrated analysis of microbiomes and metabolomics. Am Chemi Soci 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Hypothesis testing and statistical analysis of microbiome. Genes & Dis 2017, 4 (3), 138–148. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2017.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Chen D-G, Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R. Springer Singapore: 2018; Vol. 847. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Chaptereleven - correlation and association analyses in microbiome study integrating multiomics in health and disease. In: Progress in molecular biology and translational science, Sun J, editor Academic Press: 2020; Vol. 171, pp. 309–491. doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Proctor L, Priorities for the next 10 years of human microbiome research. Nat Publ Group: 2019. 569 7758 623–625 doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01654-0
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Bioinformatic and statistical analysis of microbiome data: from raw sequences to advanced modeling with QIIME 2 and R. Springer International Publishing: 2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21391-5
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Correlation and association analyses in microbiome study integrating multiomics in health and disease. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2020, 171, 309–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurdie PJ, Holmes S, McHardy AC, Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput Biol 2014, 10 (4), e1003531. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JR, Nagarajan N, Pop M, Ouzounis CA, Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5 (4), e1000352. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson JN, Stine OC, Bravo HC, Pop M, Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat Methods 2013, 10 (12), 1200–1202. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beszteri B, Temperton B, Frickenhaus S, Giovannoni SJ, Average genome size: a potential source of bias in comparative metagenomics. ISME J 2010, 4 (8), 1075–1077. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JA, Sørensen SJ, Quantitative metagenomic analyses based on average genome size normalization. Appl Environ Microb 2011, 77 (7), 2513–2521. doi:10.1128/AEM.02167-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders HL, Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am Nat 1968, 102 (925), 243–282. doi:10.1086/282541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss S, Xu ZZ, Peddada S, Amir A, Bittinger K, Gonzalez A, Lozupone C, Zaneveld JR, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Birmingham A, et al., Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics. Microbiome 2017, 5 (1), 27. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell RK, Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Lin S-Y, Mao CX, Chazdon RL, Longino JT, Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J Plant Ecol 2012, 5 (1), 3–21. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtr044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurdie PJ, Holmes S, Watson M, Phyloseq: an R package for reproducibleinteractive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 2013, 8 (4), e61217. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, The application of rarefaction techniques to molecular inventories of microbial diversity. Methods Enzymol 2005, 397, 292–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullard JH, Purdom E, Hansen KD, Dudoit S, Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-seq experiments. BMC Bioinform 2010, 11 (1), 94. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillies M-A, Rau A, Aubert J, Hennequet-Antier C, Jeanmougin M, Servant N, Keime C, Marot G, Castel D, Estelle J, et al., A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Bioinform 2012, 14 (6), 671–683. doi:10.1093/bib/bbs046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Klar B, Huson DH, Visual and statistical comparison of metagenomes. Bioinformatics 2009, 25 (15), 1849–1855. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y, RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res 2008, 18 (9), 1509–1517. doi:10.1101/gr.079558.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight DT, Huerlimann R, Bower DS, Schwarzkopf L, Alford RA, Zenger KR, Methods for normalizing microbiome data: an ecological perspective. Methods Ecology Evol 2019, 10 (3), 389–400. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty J, Mühlbauer M, Gharaibeh RZ, Arthur JC, Perez-Chanona E, Sha W, Jobin C, Fodor AA, Stochastic changes over time and not founder effects drive cage effects in microbial community assembly in a mouse model. ISME J 2013, 7 (11), 2116–2125. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Åstrand M, Speed TP, A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 2003, 19 (2), 185–193. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer‐Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP, Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 2003, 4 (2), 249–264. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen KD, Irizarry RA, Wu Z, Removing technical variability in RNA-seq data using conditional quantile normalization. Biostatistics 2012, 13 (2), 204–216. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxr054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks SC, Okrah K, Paulson JN, Quackenbush J, Irizarry RA, Bravo HC, Smooth quantile normalization. Biostatistics 2017, 19 (2), 185–198. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxx028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin J-P, Labbe A, Lemire M, Zanke BW, Hudson TJ, Fertig EJ, Greenwood CM, Hansen KD, Functional normalization of 450k methylation array data improves replication in large cancer studies. Genome Biol 2014, 15 (11), 503. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0503-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson MD, Oshlack A, A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 2010, 11 (3), R25. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014, 15 (12), 550. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson V, Osterlund T, Nerman O, Kristiansson E, Variability in metagenomic count data and its influence on the identification of differentially abundant genes. J Computer Biological 2017, 24 (4), 311–326. doi:10.1089/cmb.2016.0180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn MB, Du R, An L, A robust approach for identifying differentially abundant features in metagenomic samples. Bioinformatics 2015, 31 (14), 2269–2275. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth GK, Limma: linear models for microarray data. In Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using r and bioconductor, Springer: New York, 2005; pp. 397–420. doi:10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Reeve J, Zhang L, Huang S, Wang X, Chen J, GMPR: a robust normalization method for zero-inflated count data with application to microbiome sequencing data. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4600. doi:10.7717/peerj.4600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar MS, Slud EV, Okrah K, Hicks SC, Hannenhalli S, Corrada Bravo H, Analysis and correction of compositional bias in sparse sequencing count data. Bmc Genom 2018, 19 (1), 799. doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5160-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aitchison J, A concise guide to compositional data analysis. In: 2nd Compositional Data Analysis Workshop. Girona, Italy 20032003.
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison J, The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall Ltd. Reprinted in 2003 with additional material by The Blackburn Press.: London, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lin H, Peddada SD, Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat Commun 2020, 11 (1), 3514. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17041-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Luo Y, Jiang H, Valencia A, A novel normalization and differential abundance test framework for microbiome data. Bioinformatics 2020, 36 (13), 3959–3965. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulenga M, Kareem SA, Sabri AQM, Seera M, Govind S, Samudi C, Mohamad SB, Feature extension of gut microbiome data for deep neural network-based colorectal cancer classification. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 23565–23578. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh D, Singh B, Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. Appl Soft Comput 2020, 97, 105524. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotelli N, Colwell R, Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 2001, 4, 379–391. 4 doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao CX, Colwell RK, Estimation of species richness: mixture models, the role of rare species, and inferential challenges. Ecology 2005, 86 (5), 1143–1153. doi:10.1890/04-1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer A, Williamson M, A new relationship for rarefaction. Biodivers Conserv 1994, 3 (4), 373–379. doi:10.1007/BF00056509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner-Devine MC, Lage M, Hughes JB, Bohannan BJM, A taxa–area relationship for bacteria. Nature 2004, 432 (7018), 750–753. doi:10.1038/nature03073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jernvall J, Wright PC, Diversity components of impending primate extinctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95 (19), 11279–11283. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.19.11279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, et al., Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75 (23), 7537–7541. doi:10.1128/AEM.01541-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, et al., QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 2010, 7 (5), 335–336. doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jari Oksanen FGB, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Peter Solymos MHHS, Szoecs E, et al., Vegan: community ecology package ordination methods, diversity analysis and other functions for community and vegetation ecologists. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Leo Lahti SSEA, Tools for microbiome analysis in R. Version 1.9.95. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N, Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as apredictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microb 2009, 75 (15), 5111–5120. doi:10.1128/AEM.00335-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauber CL, Zhou N, Gordon JI, Knight R, Fierer N, Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2010, 307 (1), 80–86. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01965.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre de Cárcer D, Denman SE, McSweeney C, Morrison M, Evaluation of subsampling-based normalization strategies for tagged high-throughput sequencing data sets from gut microbiomes. Appl Environ Microb 2011, 77 (24), 8795–8798. doi:10.1128/AEM.05491-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczynski J, Liu Z, Lozupone C, McDonald D, Fierer N, Knight R, Microbial community resemblance methods differ in their ability to detect biologically relevant patterns. Nat Methods 2010, 7 (10), 813–819. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamady M, Knight R, Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects:tools, techniques, and challenges. Genome Res 2009, 19 (7), 1141–1152. doi:10.1101/gr.085464.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczynski J, Costello EK, Nemergut DR, Zaneveld J, Lauber CL, Knights D, Koren O, Fierer N, Kelley ST, Ley RE, et al., Direct sequencing of the human microbiome readily reveals community differences. Genome Biol 2010, 11 (5), 210. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillmann B, Al-Ghalith GA, Shields-Cutler RR, Zhu Q, Gohl DM, Beckman KB, Knight R, Knights D, Rawls JF, Evaluating the information content of shallow shotgun metagenomics. mSystems 2018, 3 (6), e00069–18. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00069-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou K, Anastasiou R, Georgalaki M, Bounenni R, Paximadaki A, Charmpi C, Alexandraki V, Kazou M, Tsakalidou E, Comparison of the microbiome of artisanal homemade and industrial feta cheese through amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics. Microorganisms 2022, 10 (5), 1073. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10051073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira MB, Wallroth M, Jonsson V, Kristiansson E, Comparison of normalization methods for the analysis of metagenomic gene abundance data. Bmc Genom 2018, 19 (1), 274. doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4637-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xuan C, Shamonki JM, Chung A, DiNome ML, Chung M, Sieling PA, Lee DJ, Takabe K, Microbial dysbiosis is associated with human breast cancer. PLoS One 2014, 9 (1), e83744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sze MA, Baxter NT, Ruffin MT, Rogers MA, Schloss PD, Normalization of the microbiota in patients after treatment for colonic lesions. Microbiome 2017, 5 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0366-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baxter NT, Ruffin MT, Rogers MA, Schloss PD, Microbiota-based model improves the sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test for detecting colonic lesions. Genome Med 2016, 8 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0290-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dai Z, Coker OO, Nakatsu G, Wu WKK, Zhao L, Chen Z, Chan FKL, Kristiansen K, Sung JJY, Wong SH, et al., Multi-cohort analysis of colorectal cancer metagenome identified altered bacteria across populations and universal bacterial markers. Microbiome 2018, 6 (1), 70. doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0451-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergemann TL, Wilson J, Proportion statistics to detect differentially expressed genes: a comparison with log-ratio statistics. BMC Bioinform 2011, 12, 228–228. 1 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillies MA, Rau A, Aubert J, Hennequet-Antier C, Jeanmougin M, Servant N, Keime C, Marot G, Castel D, Estelle J, et al., A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Bioinform 2013, 14 (6), 671–683. doi:10.1093/bib/bbs046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal S, Van Treuren W, White RA, Eggesbø M, Knight R, Peddada SD, Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2015, 26 (1), 27663. doi:10.3402/mehd.v26.27663
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsilimigras MC, Fodor AA, Compositional data analysis of the microbiome: fundamentals, tools, and challenges. Ann Epidemiol 2016, 26 (5), 330–335. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton JT, Sanders J, Quinn RA, McDonald D, Gonzalez A, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Navas-Molina JA, Song SJ, Metcalf JL, Hyde ER, et al., Balance trees reveal microbial niche differentiation. mSystems 2017, 2 (1). doi:10.1128/mSystems.00162-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson DA, COMPOSITIONAL DATA in COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: THE PARADIGM or PERIL of PROPORTIONS? Ecology 1997, 78 (3), 929–940. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0929:CDICET]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezasoltani S, Aghdaei HA, Jasemi S, Gazouli M, Dovrolis N, Sadeghi A, Schlüter H, Zali MR, Sechi LA, Feizabadi MM, Oral microbiota as novel Biomarkers for colorectal cancer screening. Cancers 2023, 15 (1), 192. doi:10.3390/cancers15010192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poore GD, Kopylova E, Zhu Q, Carpenter C, Fraraccio S, Wandro S, Kosciolek T, Janssen S, Metcalf J, Song SJ, Microbiome analyses of blood and tissues suggest cancer diagnostic approach. Nature 2020, 579 (7800), 567–574. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2095-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan R, Bose S, Roy R, Paul D, Rawat S, Nilwe P, Chauhan NK, Choudhury S, Tumor tissue-specific bacterial biomarker panel for colorectal cancer: bacteroides massiliensis, alistipes species, alistipes onderdonkii, bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Corynebacterium appendicis. Arch Microbiol 2022, 204 (6), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s00203-022-02954-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson RC, Shanahan ER, Batten M, Reijers ILM, Read M, Silva IP, Versluis JM, Ribeiro R, Angelatos AS, Tan J, et al., Diet-driven microbial ecology underpins associations between cancer immunotherapy outcomes and the gut microbiome. Nat Med 2022, 2344–2352. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01965-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber W, Von Heydebreck A, Sültmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M, Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 2002, 18 (suppl_1), S96–S104. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons HM, Ludwig C, Günther UL, Viant MR, Improved classification accuracy in 1- and 2-dimensional NMR metabolomics data using the variance stabilising generalised logarithm transformation. BMC Bioinform 2007, 8 (1), 234. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HC, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ, Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. Bmc Genom 2006, 7 (1), 142. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvalheim OM, Brakstad F, Liang Y, Preprocessing of analytical profiles in the presence of homoscedastic or heteroscedastic noise. Anal Chem 1994, 66 (1), 43–51. doi:10.1021/ac00073a010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng C, Wang H, Lu N, Chen T, He H, Lu Y, Tu XM, Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry 2014, 26 (2), 105–109. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.02.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng C, Wang H, Lu N, Tu XM, Log transformation: application and interpretation in biomedical research. Stat Med 2013, 32 (2), 230–239. doi:10.1002/sim.5486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Pretreating and normalizing metabolomics data for statistical analysis. Genes & Dis 2023. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2023.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Livera AM, Dias DA, De Souza D, Rupasinghe T, Pyke J, Tull D, Roessner U, McConville M, Speed TP, Normalizing and integrating metabolomics data. Anal Chem 2012, 84 (24), 10768–10776. doi:10.1021/ac302748b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin BP, Hardin JS, Hawkins DM, Rocke DM, A variance-stabilizing transformation for gene-expression microarray data. Bioinformatics 2002, 18 (suppl_1), S105–S110. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oresta B, Braga D, Lazzeri M, Frego N, Saita A, Faccani C, Fasulo V, Colombo P, Guazzoni G, Hurle R, et al., The microbiome of catheter collected urine in males with bladder cancer according to disease stage. J Urol 2021, 205 (1), 86–93. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Kim S, Fermin D, Tsou C-C, Nesvizhskii AI, QPROT: statistical method for testing differential expression using protein-level intensity data in label-free quantitative proteomics. J Proteomics 2015, 129, 121–126. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Piao Y, Shon HS, Ryu KH, Comparing the normalization methods for the differential analysis of illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq data. BMC Bioinform 2015, 16 (1), 347. doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0778-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrams ZB, Johnson TS, Huang K, Payne PRO, Coombes K, A protocol to evaluate RNA sequencing normalization methods. BMC Bioinform 2019, 20 (24), 679. doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3247-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smyth GK, Limma: linear models for microarray data. In Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and bioconductor, Springer: 2005; pp. 397–420. doi:10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Ye J, Fang D, Lv L, Wu W, Shi D, Li Y, Yang L, Bian X, Wu J, et al., Multi-omic profiling reveals associations between the gut mucosal microbiome, the metabolome, and host DNA methylation associated gene expression in patients with colorectal cancer. BMC Microbiol 2020, 20 (S1), 83. doi:10.1186/s12866-020-01762-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK, edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26 (1), 139–140. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulund F, Pereira MB, Jonsson V, E K, Computational and statistical considerations in the analysis of metagenomic data. In: Metagenomics: perspectives, methods and applications, M N, editor Academic Press: Cambridge, 2018pp. 81–102 doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102268-9.00004-5
   Google Scholar
• Sakurai T, De Velasco MA, Sakai K, Nagai T, Nishiyama H, Hashimoto K, Uemura H, Kawakami H, Nakagawa K, Ogata H, et al., Integrative analysis of gut microbiome and host transcriptomes reveals associations between treatment outcomes and immunotherapy-induced colitis. Mol Oncol 2022, 16 (7), 1493–1507. doi:10.1002/1878-0261.13062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Lau HC-H, Liu Y, Kang X, Wang Y, Ting NL-N, Kwong TN-Y, Han J, Liu W, Liu C, et al., Altered mycobiota signatures and enriched pathogenic aspergillus rambellii are associated with colorectal cancer based onmulticohort fecal metagenomic analyses. Gastroenterology 2022, 163 (4), 908–921. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin C, Lagoudas GK, Zhao C, Bullman S, Bhutkar A, Hu B, Ameh S, Sandel D, Liang XS, Mazzilli S, et al., Commensal microbiota promote lung cancer development via γδ Tcells. Cell 2019, 176 (5), 998–1013.e16. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parhi L, Alon-Maimon T, Sol A, Nejman D, Shhadeh A, Fainsod-Levi T, Yajuk O, Isaacson B, Abed J, Maalouf N, Breast cancer colonization by fusobacterium nucleatum accelerates tumor growth and metastatic progression. Nat Commun 2020, 11 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16967-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders S, Huber W, Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 2010, 11 (10), R106. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B, Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 2008, 5 (7), 621–628. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson KJ, Ingle JN, Tang X, Chia N, Jeraldo PR, Walther-Antonio MR, Kandimalla KK, Johnson S, Yao JZ, Harrington SC, et al., A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer microbiota and host gene expression. PLoS One 2017, 12 (11), e0188873. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes-Ramos CM, Kuijjer ML, Ogino S, Fuchs CS, DeMeo DL, Glass K, Quackenbush J, Gene regulatory network analysis identifies sex-linked differences in colon cancer drug metabolism. Cancer Res 2018, 78 (19), 5538–5547. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadota K, Nishiyama T, Shimizu K, A normalization strategy for comparing tag count data. Algorithms Mol Biol 2012, 7 (1), 5–5. doi:10.1186/1748-7188-7-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu L, Luo K, Lv J, Wang X, Qin S, Zhang Z, Sun S, Wang X, Yun B, He Y, Integrating expression data-based deep neural network models with biological networks to identify regulatory modules for lung adenocarcinoma. Biology 2022, 11 (9), 1291. doi:10.3390/biology11091291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anders S, McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Okoniewski M, Smyth GK, Huber W, Robinson MD, Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc 2013, 8 (9), 1765. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders S, McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Okoniewski M, Smyth GK, Huber W, Robinson MD, Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc 2013, 8 (9), 1765–1786. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maza E, In papyro comparison of TMM (edgeR), RLE (DESeq2), and MRN normalization methods for asimple two-conditions-without-replicates rna-seq experimental design. Front Genet 2016, 7 (164). doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu Z, Liu W, Jin X, Ji H, Wang H, Glusman G, Robinson M, Liu L, Ruan J, Gao S, NormExpression: an R package to normalize gene expression data using evaluated methods. Front Genet 2019, 10 (400). doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00400
   Google Scholar
• Klann E, Williamson JM, Tagliamonte MS, Ukhanova M, Asirvatham JR, Chim H, Yaghjyan L, Mai V, Microbiota composition in bilateral healthy breast tissue and breast tumors. Cancer Cause Control 2020, 31 (11), 1027–1038. doi:10.1007/s10552-020-01338-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK, Voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol 2014, 15 (2), R29. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt BL, Kuczynski J, Bhattacharya A, Huey B, Corby PM, Queiroz EL, Nightingale K, Kerr AR, DeLacure MD, Veeramachaneni R, Changes in abundance of oral microbiota associated with oral cancer. PLoS One 2014, 9 (6), e98741. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behary J, Amorim N, Jiang X-T, Raposo A, Gong L, McGovern E, Ibrahim R, Chu F, Stephens C, Jebeili H, Gut microbiota impact on the peripheral immune response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun 2021, 12 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20422-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth GK, Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3 (1). 1–25 doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1027
   Google Scholar
• Lee C, Lee S, Park T In A comparison study of statistical methods for the analysis metagenome data, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM); Kansas City, United States. IEEE. 2017; pp 1777–1781.
   Google Scholar
• Costea PI, Zeller G, Sunagawa S, Bork P, A fair comparison. Nat Methods 2014, 11 (4), 359–359. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson JN, Bravo HC, Pop M, A fair comparisonreply. Nat Methods 2014, 11 (4), 359–360. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2898
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paulson JN, Olson ND, Braccia DJ, Wagner J, Talukder H, Pop M, HC B, metagenomeSeq: statistical analysis for sparse high-throughput sequncing. Bioconductor Package, http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/software/metagenomeSeq. Version 1.28.2. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Norouzi-Beirami MH, Marashi S-A, Banaei-Moghaddam AM, Kavousi K, Beyond taxonomic analysis of microbiomes: a functional approach for revisiting microbiome changes in colorectal cancer. Front Microbiol 2020, 10, 3117. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.03117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Ye J, Fang D, Lv L, Wu W, Shi D, Li Y, Yang L, Bian X, Wu J, Multi-omic profiling reveals associations between the gut mucosal microbiome, the metabolome, and host DNA methylation associated gene expression in patients with colorectal cancer. BMC Microbiol 2020, 20 (S1), 1–13. doi:10.1186/s12866-020-01762-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alshawaqfeh M, Rababah S, Hayajneh A, Gharaibeh A, Serpedin E, MetaAnalyst: a user-friendly tool for metagenomic biomarker detection and phenotype classification. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022, 22 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01812-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, Ricketts TH, Bohannan BJ, Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67 (10), 4399–4406. doi:10.1128/AEM.67.10.4399-4406.2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai D, Pan H, Li X, Gao Y, Liu G, Xia LC, Identifying gut microbiota associated with colorectal cancer using a zero-inflated lognormal model. Front Microbiol 2019, 10, 826. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas-Aghababazadeh F, Li Q, Fridley BL, Lin H, Comparison of normalization approaches for gene expression studies completed with high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One 2018, 13 (10), e0206312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W-H, Chen K-P, Wang K, Huang H-C, Juan H-F, Characterizing the cancer-associated microbiome with small RNA sequencing data. Biochem Bioph Res Co 2020, 522 (3), 776–782. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.11.166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharofa J, Apewokin S, Alenghat T, Ollberding NJ, Metagenomic analysis of the fecal microbiome in colorectal cancer patients compared to healthy controls as a function of age. Cancer Med 2022. 12 3 2945–2957 doi:10.1002/cam4.5197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift D, Cresswell K, Johnson R, Stilianoudakis S, Wei X, A review of normalization and differential abundance methods for microbiome counts data. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 2022, e1586. 2023 1 doi:10.1002/wics.1586
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Chen J, A comprehensive evaluation of microbial differential abundance analysis methods: current status and potential solutions. Microbiome 2022, 10 (1), 130. doi:10.1186/s40168-022-01320-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Peddada SD, Analysis of microbial compositions: a review of normalization and differential abundance analysis. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2020, 6 (1), 60. doi:10.1038/s41522-020-00160-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthiah S; H, C. B. Wrench:wrench normalization for sparse count data. R pack-age version 1.16.0. https://github.com/HCBravoLab/Wrench.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Tolosana-Delgado R, Modeling and analysis of compositional data. John Wiley & Sons: London UK, 2015. doi:10.1002/9781119003144
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison J, The statistical analysis of compositional data. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1982, 44 (2), 139–160. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egozcue JJ, Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math Geol 2003, 35 (3), 279–300. doi:10.1023/A:1023818214614
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes AD, Macklaim JM, Linn TG, Reid G, Gloor GB, ANOVA-like differential expression (ALDEx) analysis for mixed population RNA-seq. PLoS One 2013, 8. 8 7 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes AD, Reid JN, Macklaim JM, McMurrough TA, Edgell DR, Gloor GB, Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome 2014, 2 (1), 15. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton JT, Sanders J, Quinn RA, McDonald D, Gonzalez A, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Navas-Molina JA, Song SJ, Metcalf JL, Hyde ER, et al., Balance trees reveal microbial niche differentiation. mSystems 2017, 2 (1), e00162–16. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00162-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman JD, Washburne AD, Mukherjee S, David LA, A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data. Elife 2017, 6, e21887. doi:10.7554/eLife.21887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Boogaart KG, Tolosana-Delgado R, Analyzing compositional data with R. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36809-7
   Google Scholar
• Quinn TP, Crowley TM, Richardson MF, Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods. BMC Bioinform 2018, 19 (1), 274. doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2261-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urbaniak C, Angelini M, Gloor GB, Reid G, Human milk microbiota profiles in relation to birthing method, gestation and infant gender. Microbiome 2016, 4 (1), 1. doi:10.1186/s40168-015-0145-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn TP, Erb I, Richardson MF, Crowley TM, Wren J, Understanding sequencing data as compositions: an outlook and review. Bioinformatics 2018, 34 (16), 2870–2878. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyednasrollah F, Laiho A, Elo LL, Comparison of software packages for detecting differential expression in RNA-seq studies. Brief Bioinform 2013, 16 (1), 59–70. doi:10.1093/bib/bbt086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarazona S, Furió-Tarí P, Turrà D, Pietro AD, Nueda MJ, Ferrer A, Conesa A, Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/Bioc package. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43 (21), e140–e140. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CR, Baccarella A, Parrish JZ, Kim CC, Empirical assessment of analysis workflows for differential expression analysis of human samples using RNA-Seq. BMC Bioinform 2017, 18 (1), 38. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1457-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton JT, Marotz C, Washburne A, Silverman J, Zaramela LS, Edlund A, Zengler K, Knight R, Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames. Nat Commun 2019, 10 (1), 2719. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10656-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Z, Cheng S, Kou Y, Wang Z, Jin R, Hu H, Zhang X, Gong J-F, Li J, Lu M, The gut microbiome is associated with clinical response to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2020, 8 (10), 1251–1261. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas C, Aitchison J, Log-ratios and geochemical discrimination of scottish dalradian limestones: a case study. Geol Soc London, Spec Publ 2006, 264 (1), 25–41. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.264.01.03
   Google Scholar
• Mandal S, Treuren W, White RA, Eggesbo M, Knight R, Peddada SD, Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2015, 26. 26 doi:10.3402/mehd.v26.27663
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Chen D-G, Compositional analysis of microbiome data. In Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R, Springer Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018; pp. 331–393. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3_10
   Google Scholar
• Brill B, Amir A, Heller R, Testing for differential abundance in compositional counts data, with application to microbiome studies. arXiv preprint arXiv 2019, 1904.08937.
   Google Scholar
• Wallen ZD, Comparison study of differential abundance testing methods using two large parkinson disease gut microbiome datasets derived from 16S amplicon sequencing. BMC Bioinform 2021, 22 (1), 1–29. doi:10.1186/s12859-021-04193-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai J, Jhaney I, Daniel G, Bruner DW Inpilot study of vaginal microbiome using QIIME 2™ in women with gynecologic cancer before and after radiation therapy, Oncol Nurs Forum, 2019. 46 2 E48–E59 doi:10.1188/19.ONF.E48-E59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung MK, Yue GGL, Tsui KY, Gomes AJ, Kwan HS, Chiu PWY, San Lau CB, Discovery of an interplay between the gut microbiota and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in mice. Am J Cancer Res 2020, 10 (8), 2409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debelius JW, Huang T, Cai Y, Ploner A, Barrett D, Zhou X, Xiao X, Li Y, Liao J, Zheng Y, et al., Subspecies niche specialization in the oral microbiome is associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk. mSystems 2020, 5 (4), e00065–20. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00065-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Chen D-G, Modeling Zero-Inflated Microbiome Data. In: Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R, Xia Y, Sun J Chen D-G, editors Springer Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018; pp. 453–496. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3_12
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Robust differential abundance test in compositional data. arXiv preprint arXiv 2021, 2101.08765.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul A, Mandal S, Davidov O, Peddada SD, Analysis of microbiome data in the presence of excess zeros. Front Microbiol 2017, 8 (2114). doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai W, Li C, Li T, Hu J, Zhang H, Super-taxon in human microbiome are identified to be associated with colorectal cancer. BMC Bioinform 2022, 23 (1), 243. doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04786-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridout M, Hinde J, Demétrio CG, A score test for testing a zero‐inflated Poisson regression model against zero‐inflated negative binomial alternatives. Biometrics 2001, 57 (1), 219–223. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00219.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung BC, Jhun M, Lee JW, Bootstrap tests foroverdispersion in a zero‐inflated Poisson regression model. Biometrics 2005, 61 (2), 626–628. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00368.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayyari E, Kawas B, Mirarab S, TADA: phylogenetic augmentation of microbiome samples enhances phenotype classification. Bioinformatics 2019, 35 (14), i31–i40. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour RF, Alfar NM, Abdel‐Khalek S, Abdelhaq M, Saeed RA, Alsaqour R, Optimal deep learning based fusion model for biomedical image classification. Expert Syst 2022, 39 (3), e12764. doi:10.1111/exsy.12764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yi N, Valencia A, Fast zero-inflated negative binomial mixed modeling approach for analyzing longitudinal metagenomics data. Bioinformatics 2020, 36 (8), 2345–2351. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozupone C, Knight R, UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. applied and environmental microbiology 2005, 71 (12), 8228–8235. Appl Environ Microb doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozupone C, Lladser ME, Knights D, Stombaugh J, Knight R, UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J 2011, 5 (2), 169–172. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bella JM, Bao Y, Gloor GB, Burton JP, Reid G, High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research. J Microbiol Methods 2013, 95 (3), 401–414. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2013.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segata N, Boernigen D, Tickle TL, Morgan XC, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C, Computational meta’omics for microbial community studies. Mol Syst Biol 2013, 9 (1), 666. doi:10.1038/msb.2013.22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navas-Molina JA, Peralta-Sánchez JM, González A, McMurdie PJ, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Xu Z, Ursell LK, Lauber C, Zhou H, Song SJ, Advancing our understanding of the human microbiome using QIIME. Vol. 531, Methods Enzymol. Elsevier; 2013; pp 371–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, The application of rarefaction techniques to molecular inventories of microbial diversity. In Methods in enzymology, Academic Press: 2005; Vol. 397, pp. 292–308. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(05)97017-1
   Google Scholar
• Koren O, Knights D, Gonzalez A, Waldron L, Segata N, Knight R, Huttenhower C, Ley RE, Eisen JA, A guide toenterotypes across the human body: meta-analysis of microbial community structures in human microbiome datasets. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9 (1), e1002863. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Morrison-Beedy D, Ma J, Feng C, Cross W, Tu X, Modeling count outcomes from HIV risk reduction interventions: a comparison of competing statistical models for count responses. AIDS Res Treat 2012, 2012, 593569–593569. doi:10.1155/2012/593569
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng C, Wang H, Han Y, Xia Y, Lu N, Tu XM, Some theoretical comparisons of negative binomial and zero-inflated Poisson distributions. Commun In Stat- Theory And Methods 2015, 44 (15), 3266–3277. doi:10.1080/03610926.2013.823203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, C DG, Modeling over-dispered microbiome data. In Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R, Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 395–451. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3_11
   Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, C DG, Modeling Zero-Inflated Microbiome Data. In Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R, Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2018; pp. 453–496. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3_12
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson V, Österlund T, Nerman O, Kristiansson E, Variability in metagenomic count data and its influence on the identification of differentially abundant genes. J Comput Biol 2017, 24 (4), 311–326. doi:10.1089/cmb.2016.0180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lêcao K-A, Managing batch effects in microbiome data. Brief Bioinform 2019. 21 6 1954–1970 doi:10.1093/bib/bbz105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Shungin D, Mallick H, Schirmer M, Nguyen LH, Kolde R, Franzosa E, Vlamakis H, Xavier R, Huttenhower C, Population structure discovery in meta-analyzed microbial communities and inflammatory bowel disease using MMUPHin. Genome Biol 2022, 23 (1), 1–31. doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02753-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling W, Lu J, Zhao N, Lulla A, Plantinga AM, Fu W, Zhang A, Liu H, Song H, Li Z, et al., Batch effects removal for microbiome data via conditional quantile regression. Nat Commun 2022, 13 (1), 5418. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33071-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Wong SH, Yu J, Wei Y, Birol I, Batch effects correction for microbiome data with Dirichlet-multinomial regression. Bioinformatics 2019, 35 (5), 807–814. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 1948, 35 (3/4), 246–254. doi:10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cárcer DA, Denman SE, McSweeney C, Morrison M, Evaluation of subsampling-based normalization strategies for tagged high-throughput sequencing data sets from gut microbiomes. Appl Environ Microb 2011, 77 (24), 8795–8798. doi:10.1128/AEM.05491-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Pretreating and normalizing metabolomics data for statistical analysis. Genes & Dis in press, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2023.04.018
   Google Scholar
• Boulund F, Pereira MB, Jonsson V, Kristiansson E, Chapter 4 - computational and statistical considerations in the analysis of metagenomic data. In: Metagenomics, Nagarajan M, editor Academic Press: 2018; pp. 81–102. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102268-9.00004-5
   Google Scholar
• Paulson JN Normalization and differential abundance analysis of metagenomic biomarker-gene surveys. University of Maryland, College Park, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson V, Österlund T, Nerman O, Kristiansson E, Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics. Bmc Genom 2016, 17, 78–78. 1 doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2386-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG, STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 2014, 30 (21), 3123–3124. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Sun J, Chen D-G, What Are Microbiome Data? In Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R, Springer Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018; pp. 29–41. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Glusman G, Caballero J, Robinson M, Kutlu B, Hood L, Jordan IK, Optimal scaling ofdigital transcriptomes. PLoS One 2013, 8 (11), e77885. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egozcue J, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Mateu-Figueraz G, Barceló-Vidal C, doi:10.1023/A:1023818214614. Math Geol 2003, 35, 279–300. 3
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre M, Measuring Subcompositional Incoherence. Math Geosci, 43, 681–693. 2011. 6 doi:10.1007/s11004-011-9338-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Fernández J-A, Hron K, Templ M, Filzmoser P, Palarea-Albaladejo J, Bayesian-multiplicative treatment of count zeros in compositional data sets. Stat Modelling 2015, 15 (2), 134–158. doi:10.1177/1471082X14535524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosimann JE, On the compound multinomial distribution, the multivariate β-distribution, and correlations among proportions. Biometrika 1962, 49 (1/2), 65–82. doi:10.1093/biomet/49.1-2.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell D, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Marguerat S, Bähler J, Dunbrack Jr RL, Proportionality: a valid alternative to correlation for relative data. PLoS Comput Biol 2015, 11 (3), e1004075. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansson E, Hugenholtz P, Dalevi D, ShotgunFunctionalizeR: an R-package for functional comparison of metagenomes. Bioinformatics 2009, 25 (20), 2737–2738. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ, The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143 (1), 29–36. doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley AP, The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn 1997, 30 (7), 1145–1159. doi:10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson KI, Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philos Trans of the R Soc of London Ser A Containing Pap of a Math or Phys Charact 1900, 195 (262–273), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman C, The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. Am J Psychol 1904, 15 (1), 72–101. doi:10.2307/1412159
   Google Scholar
• Matthews BW, Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Struct 1975, 405 (2), 442–451. doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller R, Büttner P, A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med 1994, 13 (23–24), 2465–2476. doi:10.1002/sim.4780132310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray JR, Curtis JT, An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 1957, 27 (4), 326–349. doi:10.2307/1942268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten DM, Classification and clustering of sequencing data using a Poisson model. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2011, 5 (4), 2493–2518. Ann Appl Stat doi:10.1214/11-AOAS493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, Knight R, Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microb 2007, 73 (5), 1576–1585. doi:10.1128/AEM.01996-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneath PH, The application of computers to taxonomy. Microbiology 1957, 17 (1), 201–226. doi:10.1099/00221287-17-1-201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuitty LL, Hierarchical linkage analysis for the isolation of types. Educ Psychol Meas 1960, 20 (1), 55–67. doi:10.1177/001316446002000106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal R, Sneath PHA Principles of numerical taxonomy. WH: Freeman, San Francisco: 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal RR, A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull. 1958, 38, 1409–1438.
   Google Scholar
• Ward JH Jr, Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 1963, 58 (301), 236–244. doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson KL, LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. London, Edinburgh Dublin Phil Mag J Sci 1901, 2 (11), 559–572. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling H, Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 1933, 24 (6), 417. doi:10.1037/h0071325
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling H, Relations Between Two Sets of Variates. Biometrika 1936, 28 (3/4), 321–377. doi:10.1093/biomet/28.3-4.321
   Google Scholar
• Gower JC, Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 1966, 53 (3–4), 325–338. doi:10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard RN, The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika 1962, 27 (2), 125–140. doi:10.1007/BF02289630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard RN, Metric structures in ordinal data. J Math Psychol 1966, 3 (2), 287–315. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(66)90017-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal JB, Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 1964, 29 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1007/BF02289565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal JB, Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika 1964, 29 (2), 115–129. doi:10.1007/BF02289694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard K, Gilbert H, Ge Y, Taylor S, Dudoit S , Multtest: Resampling-Based Multiple Hypothesis Testing 2023. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=multtest,rpackageversion2.57.0
   Google Scholar
• Robinson MD, Smyth GK, Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data. Biostatistics 2008, 9 (2), 321–332. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MJ, Walsh DC, PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecological monographs 2013, 83 (4), 557–574. doi:10.1890/12-2010.1
   Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Golovnina K, Chen Z-X, Lee HN, Negron YLS, Sultana H, Oliver B, Harbison ST, Comparison of normalization and differential expression analyses using RNA-Seq data from 726 individual Drosophila melanogaster. Bmc Genom 2016, 17 (1), 28. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2353-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M, RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature reviews genetics 2009, 10 (1), 57–63. Nat Rev Genet doi:10.1038/nrg2484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Ling W, Zhao N, Plantinga AM, Broedlow CA, Klatt NR, Hensley-McBain T, Wu MC, Accommodating multiple potential normalizations in microbiome associations studies. BMC Bioinform 2023, 24 (1), 22. doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05147-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar