Transcription factors dynamically control the spatial organization of the yeast genome

References

• Hubner MR, Eckersley-Maslin MA, Spector DL. Chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23:89-95; PMID:23270812; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, Faza MB, Talhout W, Eussen BH, de Klein A, Wessels L, de Laat W, et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008; 453:948-51; PMID:18463634; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egecioglu D, Brickner JH. Gene positioning and expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011; 23:338-45; PMID:21292462; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Quinn JC, Prasanth KV, Swiss VA, Economides KD, Camacho MM, Spector DL, Abate-Shen C. PIAS1 confers DNA-binding specificity on the Msx1 homeoprotein. Genes Dev 2006; 20:784-94; PMID:16600910; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1392006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragoczy T, Bender MA, Telling A, Byron R, Groudine M. The locus control region is required for association of the murine β-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev 2006; 20:1447-57; PMID:16705039; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1419506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010; 140:360-71; PMID:20144760; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randise-Hinchliff C, Coukos R, Sood V, Sumner MC, Zdraljevic S, Meldi Sholl L, Garvey Brickner D, Ahmed S, Watchmaker L, Brickner JH. Strategies to regulate transcription factor-mediated gene positioning and interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. J Cell Biol 2016; 212:633-46; PMID:26953353; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201508068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner JH, Walter P. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol 2004; 2:e342; PMID:15455074; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver PA. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004; 117:427-39; PMID:15137937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00448-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohner S, Kalck V, Wang X, Ikegami K, Lieb JD, Gasser SM, Meister P. Promoter- and RNA polymerase II-dependent hsp-16 gene association with nuclear pores in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 2013; 200:589-604; PMID:23460676; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201207024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Hediger F, Kalck V, Cubizolles F, Schober H, Gasser SM. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 2006; 441:774-8; PMID:16760983; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner DG, Cajigas I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Ahmed S, Lee PC, Widom J, Brickner JH. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e81; PMID:17373856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Brickner DG, Light WH, Cajigas I, McDonough M, Froyshteter AB, Volpe T, Brickner JH. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:111-8; PMID:20098417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010; 140:372-83; PMID:20144761; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JM, Leach J, Reittie JE, Atzberger A, Lee-Prudhoe J, Wood WG, Higgs DR, Iborra FJ, Buckle VJ. Coregulated human globin genes are frequently in spatial proximity when active. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:177-87; PMID:16418531; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200507073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder S, Sexton T, Chakalova L, Cope NF, Horton A, Andrews S, Kurukuti S, Mitchell JA, Umlauf D, Dimitrova DS, et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 2010; 42:53-61; PMID:20010836; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolhuis B, Blom M, Kerkhoven RM, Pagie L, Teunissen H, Nieuwland M, Simonis M, de Laat W, van Lohuizen M, van Steensel B. Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1001343; PMID:21455484; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantignies F, Roure V, Comet I, Leblanc B, Schuettengruber B, Bonnet J, Tixier V, Mas A, Cavalli G. Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 2011; 144:214-26; PMID:21241892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Haeusler RA, Good PD, Engelke DR. Nucleolar clustering of dispersed tRNA genes. Science 2003; 302:1399-401; PMID:14631041; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1089814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio OM, Billington BL, Gottschling DE. Modifiers of position effect are shared between telomeric and silent mating-type loci in S. cerevisiae. Cell 1991; 66:1279-87; PMID:1913809; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90049-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner DG, Ahmed S, Meldi L, Thompson A, Light W, Young M, Hickman TL, Chu F, Fabre E, Brickner JH. Transcription factor binding to a DNA zip code controls interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. Dev Cell 2012; 22:1234-46; PMID:22579222; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Brickner JH. Regulation and epigenetic control of transcription at the nuclear periphery. Trends Genet 2007; 23:396-402; PMID:17566592; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves JA, Henry SA. Regulation of the yeast INO1 gene. The products of the INO2, INO4 and OPI1 regulatory genes are not required for repression in response to inositol. Genetics 2000; 154:1485-95; PMID:10747047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Garcia P, Jeong J, Capelson M. Nucleoporin Nup98 associates with Trx/MLL and NSL histone-modifying complexes and regulates Hox gene expression. Cell Rep 2014; 9:433-42; PMID:25310983; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlett SE, Carmen AA, Suka N, Turner BM, Grunstein M. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 1998; 392:831-5; PMID:9572144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/33952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyken WT, Repenning A, Kumme J, Schuller HJ. Constitutive expression of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes by variants of Ino2 activator defective for interaction with Opi1 repressor. Mol Microbiol 2005; 56:696-707; PMID:15819625; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04499.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Zhao H, Mancera E, Steinmetz LM, Snyder M. Genetic analysis of variation in transcription factor binding in yeast. Nature 2010; 464:1187-91; PMID:20237471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedford K, Kim S, Sa D, Stevens K, Tyers M. Regulation of the mating pheromone and invasive growth responses in yeast by two MAP kinase substrates. Curr Biol 1997; 7:228-38; PMID:9094309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00118-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson KA, Nelson C, Tai G, Hung W, Yong C, Astell C, Sadowski I. Two regulators of Ste12p inhibit pheromone-responsive transcription by separate mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:4199-209; PMID:10825185; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.12.4199-4209.2000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnebusch AG. Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol 2005; 59:407-50; PMID:16153175; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.59.031805.133833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra R, Kerr SC, Harreman MT, Apponi LH, Fasken MB, Ramineni S, Chaurasia S, Valentini SR, Corbett AH. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:3042-9; PMID:17158105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608741200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar A, Gasser SM. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:507-17; PMID:17549064; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker SP, Grant PA. The SAGA continues: expanding the cellular role of a transcriptional co-activator complex. Oncogene 2007; 26:5329-40; PMID:17694076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar