Not just binary: embracing the complexity of nuclear division dynamics

References

• Lin DH, Hoelz A. The structure of the nuclear pore complex (an update). Annu Revi Biochem. 2019;88(June):725–12. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frey S, Görlich D. Asaturated FG-Repeat hydrogel can reproduce the permeability properties of nuclear pore complexes. Cell. 2007;130(3):512–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popken P, Ghavami A, Onck PR, et al. Size-dependent leak of soluble and membrane proteins through the yeast nuclear pore complex. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26(7):1386–1394. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timney BL, Raveh B, Mironska R, et al. Simple rules for passive diffusion through the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Bio. 2016;215(1):57–76. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201601004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing CE, Yee Joyce Fung H, Min Chook Y. Karyopherin-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(5):307–328. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00446-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hetzer MW. Nuclear pore complex maintenance and implications for age-related diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 2022;32(3):216–227. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2021.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins F, Sousa J, Pereira CD, et al. Nuclear envelope dysfunction and its contribution to the aging process. Aging Cell. 2020;19(5):e13143. doi: 10.1111/acel.13143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey G, Baum B. Nuclear envelope remodelling during mitosis. Curr Opinion Cell Biol. 2021;70(June):67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.12.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumann FR, Nurse P. Nuclear size control in fission yeast. J Cell Bio. 2007;179(4):593–600. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200708054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungricht R, Kutay U. Mechanisms and functions of nuclear envelope remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(4):229–245. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazer S, Lynch M, Needleman D. Deciphering the evolutionary history of open and closed mitosis. Curr Biol. 2014;24(22):R1099–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettcher B, Barral Y. The cell biology of open and closed mitosis. Nucleus. 2013;4(3):160–165. doi: 10.4161/nucl.24676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza Colin PC, Osmani SA. Mitosis, not just open or closed. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6(9):1521–1527. doi: 10.1128/EC.00178-07
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hauke D, McAinsh AD. Exotic Mitotic Mechanisms. Open Biol. 2012;2(12):120140. doi: 10.1098/rsob.120140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heath IB. Variant mitoses in lower eukaryotes: Indicators of the evolution of mitosis. Int Rev Cytol. 1980;64:1–80. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60235-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Makarova M, Oliferenko S. Mixing and matching nuclear envelope remodeling and spindle assembly strategies in the evolution of mitosis. Curr Opinion Cell Biol. 2016;41(August):43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King GA, Goodman JS, Schick JG, et al. Meiotic cellular rejuvenation is coupled to nuclear remodeling in budding yeast.” edited by Noboru mizushima, Vivek Malhotra, Noboru mizushima, tokuko haraguchi, and c Patrick lusk. Elife. 2019a;8(August):e47156. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duan T, Cupp R, Geyer PK. Drosophila female germline stem cells undergo mitosis without nuclear breakdown. Curr Biol. 2021;31(7):1450–1462.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubinet C, White IJ, Baum B. Asymmetric nuclear division in neural stem cells generates sibling nuclei that differ in size, envelope composition, and chromatin organization. Curr Biol. 2021;31(18):3973–3983.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafstrom JP, Staehelin LA. Dynamics of the nuclear envelope and of nuclear pore complexes during mitosis in the drosophila embryo. Eur J Cell Biol. 1984;34(1):179–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrandiz N, Downie L, Starling GP, et al. Endomembranes promote chromosome missegregation by ensheathing misaligned chromosomes. J Cell Bio. 2022;221(6):e202203021. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202203021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang C, Grava S, van den Hoorn T, et al. Mobility, microtubule nucleation and structure of microtubule-organizing centers in multinucleated hyphae of ashbya gossypii. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(1):18–28. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e09-01-0063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita I, Nishihara Y, Tanaka M, et al. Telomere-nuclear envelope dissociation promoted by rap1 phosphorylation ensures faithful chromosome segregation. Curr Biol. 2012;22(20):1932–1937. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper GH, Sprenger S, Teis D, et al. ESCRT-III/Vps4 controls heterochromatin-nuclear envelope attachments. Dev Cell. 2020;53(1):27–41.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptak C, Saik NO, Premashankar A, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent mitotic SUMOylation drives nuclear envelope–chromatin Interactions. J Cell Bio. 2021;220(12):e202103036. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202103036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam C, Gu Y, Oliferenko S. Partitioning and remodeling of the Schizosaccharomyces Japonicus mitotic nucleus require chromosome tethers. Curr Biol. 2013;23(22):2303–2310. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagnetti S, Oliferenko S, Nurse P. Fission yeast cells undergo nuclear division in the absence of spindle microtubules. PLOS Biol. 2010;8(10):e1000512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam C, He Y, Zhang D, et al. Divergent strategies for controlling the nuclear membrane satisfy geometric constraints during nuclear division. Curr Biol. 2011;21(15):1314–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Oliferenko S. Remodeling the nuclear membrane during closed mitosis. Curr Opinion Cell Biol. 2013;25(1):142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova M, Gu Y, Chen J-S, et al. Temporal regulation of lipin activity diverged to account for differences in mitotic programs. Curr Biol. 2016;26(2):237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah H, Olivetta M, Bhickta C, et al. Life cycle-coupled evolution of mitosis in close relatives of animals. 2023. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.10.540163.
   Google Scholar
• Sagolla MS, Dawson SC, Mancuso JJ, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of mitosis and cytokinesis in the binucleate parasite giardia intestinalis. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(23):4889–4900. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straube A, Weber I, Steinberg G. A novel mechanism of nuclear envelope break-down in a fungus: Nuclear migration strips off the envelope. Embo J. 2005;24(9):1674–1685. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuylen S, Blaukopf C, Politi AZ, et al. Ki-67 acts as a biological surfactant to disperse mitotic chromosomes. Nature. 2016;535(7611):308–312. doi: 10.1038/nature18610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuylen-Haering S, Petrovic M, Hernandez-Armendariz A, et al. Chromosome clustering by ki-67 excludes cytoplasm during nuclear assembly. Nature. 2020;587(7833):285–290. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2672-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit A, Segura-Totten M, Gruenbaum Y, et al. Barrier-to-autointegration factor is required to segregate and enclose chromosomes within the nuclear envelope and assemble the nuclear lamina. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2005;102(9):3290–3295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408364102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samwer M, Schneider MWG, Hoefler R, et al. DNA cross-bridging shapes a single nucleus from a set of mitotic chromosomes. Cell. 2017;170(5):956–972.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos Y, Hodgson L, Mantell J, et al. ESCRT-III controls nuclear envelope reformation. Nature. 2015;522(7555):236–239. doi: 10.1038/nature14503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vietri M, Schink KO, Campsteijn C, et al. Spastin and ESCRT-III coordinate mitotic spindle disassembly and nuclear envelope sealing. Nature. 2015;522(7555):231–235. doi: 10.1038/nature14408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbeater BSC. The Choanoflagellates: evolution, Biology and Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139051125
   Google Scholar
• Lee KK, Gruenbaum Y, Spann P, et al. C. Elegans nuclear envelope proteins emerin, man1, lamin, and nucleoporins reveal unique timing of nuclear envelope breakdown during mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11(9):3089–3099. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.9.3089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding R, McDonald KL, McIntosh JR. Three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis of mitotic spindles from the yeast, schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Bio. 1993;120(1):141–151. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West RR, Vaisberg EV, Ding R, et al. cut11 +: A gene required for cell cycle-dependent spindle pole body anchoring in the nuclear envelope and bipolar spindle formation in schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9(10):2839–2855. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.10.2839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Álvarez A, Bez C, O’Toole ET, et al. Mitotic nuclear envelope breakdown and spindle nucleation are controlled by interphase contacts between centromeres and the nuclear envelope. Dev Cell. 2016;39(5):544–559. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ader NR, Chen L, Surovtsev IV, et al. An ESCRT grommet cooperates with a diffusion barrier to maintain nuclear integrity. Nat Cell Biol. 2023;25(10):1465–1477. doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01235-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey G, Culley S, Curran S, et al. Closed mitosis requires local disassembly of the nuclear envelope. Nature. 2020;585(7823):119–123. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2648-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza Colin PC, Osmani AH, Hashmi SB, et al. Partial nuclear pore complex disassembly during closed mitosis in aspergillus nidulans. Current Biology: CB. 2004;14(22):1973–1984. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh S, Markossian S, Osmani AH, et al. Mitotic nuclear pore complex segregation involves nup2 in aspergillus nidulans. J Cell Bio. 2017;216(9):2813–2826. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201610019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitic K, Meyer I, Gräf R, et al. Temporal changes in nuclear envelope permeability during semi-closed mitosis in dictyostelium amoebae. Cells. 2023;12(10):1380. doi: 10.3390/cells12101380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theisen U, Straube A, Steinberg G, et al. Dynamic rearrangement of nucleoporins during fungal “open” mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(3):1230–1240. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lénárt P, Rabut G, Daigle N, et al. Nuclear envelope breakdown in starfish oocytes proceeds by partial NPC disassembly followed by a rapidly spreading fenestration of nuclear membranes. J Cell Bio. 2003;160(7):1055–1068. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200211076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winey M, Yarar D, Giddings TH, et al. Nuclear pore complex number and distribution throughout the saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle by three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs of nuclear envelopes. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8(11):2119–2132. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.11.2119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton SN, Smith SE, Unruh JR, et al. A distinct inner nuclear membrane proteome in saccharomyces cerevisiae gametes. G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics. 2021;11(12):jkab345. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnica-Krezel L, Burland TG, Dove WF. Variable pathways for developmental changes of mitosis and cytokinesis in physarum polycephalum. J Cell Bio. 1991;113(3):591–604. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.3.591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai K, Sato M, Tanaka K, et al. Nuclear compartmentalization is abolished during fission yeast meiosis. Curr Biol. 2010;20(21):1913–1918. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakawa H, Kojidani T, Mori C, et al. Virtual breakdown of the nuclear envelope in fission yeast meiosis. Curr Biol. 2010;20(21):1919–1925. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King GA, Wettstein R, Varberg JM, et al. Meiotic nuclear pore complex remodeling provides key insights into nuclear basket organization. J Cell Bio. 2022;222(2):e202204039. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202204039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipiczki M. Where does fission yeast sit on the tree of life? Genome Bio. 2000;1(2):reviews1011.1–reviews1011.4. doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-1-2-reviews1011
   Google Scholar
• Flor-Parra I, Belén Iglesias-Romero A, Salas-Pino S, et al. Importin α and vNEBD control meiotic spindle disassembly in fission yeast. Cell Rep. 2018;23(4):933–941. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ünal E, Kinde B, Amon A. Gametogenesis eliminates age-induced cellular damage and resets lifespan in yeast. Science. 2011;332(6037):1554–1557. doi: 10.1126/science.1204349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu DB, Gromova T, Newman TAC, et al. The nucleoporin nup2 contains a meiotic-autonomous region that promotes the dynamic chromosome events of meiosis. Genetics. 2017;206(3):1319–1337. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.194555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komachi K, Burgess SM. The Nup2 meiotic-autonomous region relieves inhibition of nup60 to promote progression of meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Genetics. 2022;221(1):iyac045. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Mori C, Kojidani T, et al. Two distinct repeat sequences of nup98 nucleoporins characterize dual nuclei in the binucleated ciliate tetrahymena. Curr Biol. 2009;19(10):843–847. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Osakada H, Mori C, et al. Compositionally distinct nuclear pore complexes of functionally distinct dimorphic nuclei in the ciliate tetrahymena. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(10):1822–1834. doi: 10.1242/jcs.199398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson DJ. The diversity of eukaryotes. Am Natur. 1999;154(S4):S96–124. doi: 10.1086/303287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knott GJ, Doudna JA. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science. 2018;361(6405):866–869. doi: 10.1126/science.aat5011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell KL, McLaughlin DJ. Ultrastructure of meiosis in Ustilago maydis. Mycologia. 1984;76(3):468–485. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1984.12023868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speijer D, Lukeš J, Eliáš M. Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of eukaryotic life. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(29):8827–8834. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501725112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar