The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: empirical evidence from Austria

References

• Ache, P., & Fedrowitz, M. (2012). The development of co-housing initiatives in Germany. Built Environment, 38(3), 395–412.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Preface: From the “new localism” to the spaces of neoliberalism. Antipode, 34(3), 341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1991). Introduction. In W.W. Powell & P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Droste, C. (2015). German co-housing: An opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Förster, W. (2002). 80 years of social housing in Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.wien.gv.at/english/housing/promotion/pdf/socialhous.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. (2012). Seeding community: Collaborative housing as a strategy for social and neighbourhood repair. Built Environment, 38(3), 364–394.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, E. (2015). Nutzen statt Besitzen [Using instead of owning]. RaumPlanung, 179, 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, R., & Huber, M. (2014). Die Sicherung der “Sozialen Nachhaltigkeit” im zweistufigen Bauträgerwettbewerb: Evaluierung der soziologischen Aspekte – Eine Zwischenbilanz [Ensuring social sustainability in the two-stage housing developers' competition – An evaluation of sociological aspects. An interim result]. Vienna: wohnbund:consult. Retrieved from http://www.wohnbauforschung.at/index.php?id=432
   Google Scholar
• Hendrich, P. (2012). [ro*sa]. In id22: Institute for Creative Sustainability:experimentcity (Ed.), CoHousing cultures: Handbook for self-organized, community-oriented and sustainable housing (pp. 132–147). Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• id22: Institute for Creative Sustainability:experimentcity. (Ed.). (2012). CoHousing cultures: Handbook for self-organized, community-oriented and sustainable housing. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• IIBW. (2009). Kompetenzgefüge im österreichischen Wohnungswesen. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, J. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook on third sector policy in Europe. Multi-level processes and organized civil society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A. (2015). Self-managed co-housing in the context of an ageing population in Europe. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R. (2013). Social sustainability in cooperative housing. In H. Widmann (Ed.), Smart city – Viennese expertise based on science and research (pp. 67–74). Vienna: Schmid.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Mullins, D. (2015). Bringing real localism into practice through co-operative housing governance. The role and prospects for community-led housing in England. Housing and Communities Research Group WP1-2015, Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Retrieved from http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-policy/IASS/housing/2015/working-paper-series/HCR-WP-1-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lang R., & Novy, A. (2014). Cooperative housing and social cohesion: The role of linking social capital. European Planning Studies, 22(8), 1744–1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang R., & Roessl, D. (2013). The governance of co-operative housing: Current challenges and future perspectives. International Journal of Co-Operative Management, 6(2), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, J. (2010). Path dependency and emergent relations: Explaining the different role of limited profit housing in the dynamic urban regimes of Vienna and Zurich. Housing, Theory and Society, 27(3), 204–220.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, J., & Milligan, V. (2007). International trends in housing and policy responses (AHURI Final Report No. 110). Sydney: AHURI. Retrived from https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/110
   Google Scholar
• Matznetter, W. (2002). Social housing policy in a conservative welfare state: Austria as an example. Urban Studies, 39(2), 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millonig, E., Deubner, H., Brugger, E., Kreyer, I., & Matosic, T. (2010). Evaluierung der Wohnform “Co-housing” am Beispiel von bestehenden Projekten in Niederösterreich F- 2150 [Evaluation of the housing type “Co-housing” with particular reference to existing projects in Lower Austria F-2150]. Vienna: ARGE Brugger/Matosic GesbR. Retrieved from http://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/5602880/evaluierung-der-wohnform-co-housing-am-beispiel-von-
   Google Scholar
• Minora, F., Mullins, D., & Jones, P (2013). Governing for habitability. Self-organised communities in England and Italy. International Journal of Co-Operative Management, 6(2), 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., & McKee, K. (2012). Empowering local communities: An international review of community land trusts. Housing Studies, 27(1), 280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, S., & Pittini, A. (2012). Profiles of a movement: Co-operative housing around the world. CECODHAS Housing Europe and ICA Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Nussbaumer, J. (2005). Defining the social economy and its governance at the neighbourhood level: A methodological reflection. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2071–2088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy, K. (1993). Beiträge zum Planungs- und Wohnungswesen [Contributions to planning and housing]. In City of Vienna (Ed.), Beiträge zur Stadtforschung, Stadtentwicklung und Stadtgeschichte Band 41 [Contributions to urban research, urban development and urban history]. Vienna: City of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Novy, K., & Förster, W. (1991). Einfach bauen: Genossenschaftliche Selbsthilfe nach der Jahrhundertwende. Zur Rekonstruktion der Wiener Siedlerbewegung [Building simple: Co-operative self-help after the turn of the century. Reconstructing the Viennese settlers' movement]. Vienna: Picus.
   Google Scholar
• Obinger, H., Leibfried, St., & Castles, F.G. (2005). Federalism and the welfare state. New world and European experiences. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, M. (2004). Economics, planning and housing. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ronald, R. (2014). Housing and welfare in Western Europe: Transformations and challenges for the social rented sector. LHI Journal, 4(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, R. (2009). Forging mutual futures – Co-operative, mutual and community based housing in practice: History & potential (Report to the Commission on Co-operative and Mutual Housing). Birmingham: Commission on Co-operative & Mutual Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Temel, R., Lorbek, M., Ptaszyńska, A., & Wittinger, D. (2009). Baugemeinschaften in Wien: Endbericht 1, Potenzialabschätzung und Rahmenbedingungen [Building Cooperatives in Vienna: Assessment of Potential and Conditions]. Vienna: City of Vienna, MA50.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2015). The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2023–2040. doi:10.1177/0042098015586696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, H., Dol, C., & Oxley, M.J. (2011). Western European housing systems and the impact of the international financial crisis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26(3), 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. (Ed.). (2010). Living together – Co-housing ideas and realities around the world. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology Division of Urban Studies in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU.
   Google Scholar
• Wankiewicz, H. (2015). The potential of cohousing for rural Austria. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohnfonds Wien. (2015). Beurteilungsblatt 4-Säulen Modell [Assessment form 4-pillar model]. Retrieved from http://www.wohnfonds.wien.at/media/file/Neubau/4-Saulen-Modell.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wohnfonds Wien. (n.d.). Bewerbungsverfahren für Baugruppen: 22., aspern+ Die Seestadt Wiens [Application procedure for building groups: 22., aspern+ Vienna's Lakeside Town]. Retrieved from http://www.wohnfonds.wien.at/media/file/Neubau/abgeschl_wettbewerbe/2012_22_aspern_die_Seestadt_Wiens_Baugruppen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar