Home ownership under changing labour and housing market conditions: tenure preferences and outcomes among freelancers and flex workers

References

• Atkinson, J. (1984). Manpower strategies for flexible organisations. Personnel Management, 16, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Barbieri, P. (2009). Flexible employment and inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 621–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., & Faulkner, D. (2011). Housing transitions through the life course: Aspirations, needs and policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boelhouwer, P., & Priemus, H. (2014). Demise of the Dutch social housing tradition: Impact of budget cuts and political changes. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29, 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G., & Natali, D. (2011). The politics of the new welfare states in Western Europe ( Working Paper 2011/17). Florence: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Companen. (2012). Koopstarters op de woningmarkt. Arnhem: Companen Advies voor woningmarkt en leefomgeving.
   Google Scholar
• De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Van Emmerik, H. (2011). Temporary employment: Costs and benefits for the careers of employees and organisations. Career Development International, 16(2), 104–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, C., Manting, D., & Mulder, C. (2013). Longitudinal analysis of the formation and realisation of preferences to move into home ownership in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28, 469–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dol, K., Boumeester, H., & Mariën, G. (2014). De positie van flexwerkers en ZZP-ers op de woningmarkt. Delft: Delft University of Technology, OTB Research for the Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Dol, K., Lennartz, C., & De Decker, P. (2012). Self-provided housing in developed societies. In S. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopedia of housing and home (pp. 310–315). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Doling, J., & Elsinga, M. (2013). Demographic change and housing wealth: Homeowners, pensions and asset-based welfare in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Doling, J., & Ford, J. (2003). Globalisation and home ownership. Experiences in eight member states of the European Union. Delft: DUP Science.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skill: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In P. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feijten, P., & Mulder, C. (2002). The timing of household events and housing events in the Netherlands: A longitudinal perspective. Housing Studies, 17, 773–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J., & Wilcox, S. (1998). Owner occupation, employment and welfare: The impact of changing relations on sustainable home ownership. Housing Studies, 13(5), 623–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebel, M., & Giesecke, J. (2011). Labour market flexibility and inequality: The changing skill-based temporary employment and unemployment risks in Europe. Social Forces, 90(1), 17–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffner, M., Hoekstra, J., Oxley, M., & van der Heijden, H. (2009). Bridging the gap between social and market rented housing in six European Countries. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Soskice D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helderman, A.C. (2007). Once a homeowner, always a homeowner? An analysis of moves out of owner-occupation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22, 239–261.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J., (2006). Corporatism and housing regimes. Housing, Theory and Society, 23(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. (2016). Zelfstandig worden? Nee, bedankt. Bijna niemand in loondienst wil zzp'er worden. Te riskant. NRC Newspaper. Retrieved from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/03/09/zelfstandig-worden-nee-bedankt-1596343-a614181
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Employment outlook 2016. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). Employment outlook 2009: Tackling the jobs crisis. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Remery, C., Van Doorne-Huiskes, A., & Schippers, J. (2002). Labour market flexibility in the Netherlands: Looking for winners and losers. Work, Employment and Society, 16(3), 477–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronald, R. (2008). The ideology of home ownership. Homeowner societies and the role of housing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, P. (2006). Globalisation and the reform of European social models. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEO. (2013). De sociaal-economische situatie van langdurig flexibele werknemers. Amsterdam: SEO economisch onderzoek.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon K., Lunde, J., & Whitehead, C. (2011). Responding to the housing and financial crises: Mortgage lending, mortgage products and government policies. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(1), 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H., & Seabrooke, L. (2008). Varieties of residential capitalism in the international political economy: Old welfare states and the new politics of housing. Comparative European Politics, 6, 237–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegeder, G., & Helbrecht, I. (2007). Germany: Home ownership, a Janus-faced in time of welfare restructuring. In M. Elsinga, P. De Decker, N. Teller, & J. Toussaint ( Eds.), Home ownership beyond asset and security. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar