Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision

References

• Aernouts, N., & Ryckewaert, M. (2017). Beyond housing: On the role of commoning in the establishment of a Community Land Trust project. International Journal of Housing Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birchall, J. (1992). Housing co-operatives in Britain. Department of Government Working Papers No. 21. London: Brunel University.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of services. London: Carnegie Trust and Commission for Rural Community Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bowcott, O. (2012, September 27). First squatter jailed under new law. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/sep/27/first-squatter-jailed-new-law
   Google Scholar
• Bronzini, M. (2017). Contested issues surrounding social sustainability and self-building in Italy. International Journal of Housing Policy, 17(3), 353–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, S. (2015). Pursuing urban commons: Politics and alliances in CLT activism in East London. Antipode, 48(1), 134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabré, E., & Andrés, A. (2017). La Borda: A case study of the implementation of cooperative housing in Catalonia. International Journal of Housing Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/19491247.2017.1331591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confederation of Co-operative Housing. (2009). Bringing democracy home. Liverpool: Commission on Co-operative and Mutual Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, L. (2014). Community Land Trusts and Indigenous Housing in Australia- exploring difference based policy and appropriate housing. Housing Studies, 29(6), 743–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, L. (2018). Self-organised housing in Australia: Housing diversity in an age of market heat. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1) , 15–34. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1198083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czischke, D. (2018). Collaborative housing and housing providers: Towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1) , 55–81. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. E. (Ed.). (2010). The community land trust reader. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Droste, C. (2015). German co-housing: An opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoso, R. E., & Elsinga, M. (2017). Management of low-income condominiums in Bogotá and Quito: The balance between property law and self-organisation. International Journal of Housing Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1248608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelsman, U., Rowe, M., & Southern, A. (2018). Community Land Trusts, affordable housing and community organising in low-income neighbourhoods. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1) , 103–123. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1198082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, D. J., & Uffer, S. (2014). The financialisation of rental housing. A comparative analysis of New York City and Berlin. Urban Studies, 53(7) 1486–1502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. (2012). Seeding community: Collaborative housing as a strategy for social and neighbourhood repair. Built Environment, 38(3), 364–394.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy: An ethical guide for transforming our communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, A. (2016). Local housing, community living: Prospects for scaling up and scaling out community-led housing. London: Smith Institute.
   Google Scholar
• id22: Institute for Creative Sustainability: experiment city. (Ed.). (2012). CoHousing cultures: Handbook for self-organized, community-oriented and sustainable housing. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2015). Community led housing and ‘Slow’ opposition to corporate development: Citizen participation as common ground? Geography Compass, 9(4), 202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R. (2016). The co-operative identity of collaborative housing models in Austria. In F. Taisch, A. Jungmeister, & H. Gernet (Eds), Genossenschaftliche Identität und Wachstum – Cooperative Identity and Growth (pp. 84–93). St. Gallen: Verlag Raiffeisen Schweiz. ISBN 9783033057821.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Roessl, D. (Eds.). (2013). The Governance of co-operative housing: Current challenges and future perspectives. International Journal of Co-operative Management, 6(2), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Stoeger, H. (2018). The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: Empirical evidence from Austria. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1) , 35–54. doi:10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, J. (2010). Path dependency and emergent relations: Explaining the different role of limited profit housing in the dynamic urban regimes of Vienna and Zurich. Housing, Theory and Society, 27(3), 204–220.
   Google Scholar
• Midheme, E., & Moulaert, F. (2013). Pushing back the frontiers of property: Community land trusts and low-income housing in urban Kenya. Land Use Policy, 35, 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minora, F., Mullins, D., & Jones, P. (2013). Governing for habitability. Self-organised communities in England and Italy. International Journal of Co-operative Management, 6(2), 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, J., & Bulloch S. L. (2012). The idea of a ‘civic core’: What are the overlaps between charitable giving, volunteering, and civic participation in England and Wales? Third Sector Research Centre Working Paper 73. Birmingham: TSRC, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. (2018). Replication through partnership: The evolution of partnerships between community land trusts and housing associations in England. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1) , 82–102. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1198084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., & Mullins, D. (2013). Scaling-up or going viral? Comparing community land trust and self-help housing facilitation. Voluntary Sector Review, 4(3), 333–353.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, S., & Pittini, A. (2012). Profiles of a movement, co-operative housing around the world. Brussels: CECODHAS.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D. (2010). Housing associations. Third Sector Research Centre Working Paper 16. Birmingham: TSRC, University of Birmingham. Retrieved from http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/800/1/WP16_Housing_associations_-_Mullins_Aug_10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D. (2018). Achieving policy recognition for community-based housing solutions: The case of self-help housing in England. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1) , 143–155. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1384692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murie, A. (2008). Moving homes: The housing corporation 1964-2008. London: Politico's.
   Google Scholar
• National CLT Network. (n.d.). Introduction to the legal formats. Retrieved from http://www.communitylandtrusts.org.uk/_filecache/3d8/4e6/196-introduction-to-legal-formats–for-website.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National CLT Network. (2017, November 29). Government relaunches multi-million Community Housing Fund. Retrieved from http://www.communitylandtrusts.org.uk/article/2017/11/29/government-relaunches-multi-million-community-housing-fund
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society. Explaining the non-profit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F. (2016). Self-organisation and urban development: Disaggregating the City-Region, Deconstructing urbanity in Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(6), 1152–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J., & Bengtsson, B. (2018). The Pyrrhic victory of civil society housing? Co-operative housing in Sweden and Norway. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1) , 124–142. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1162078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2015). Between boundaries: From communing and guerrilla gardening to community land trust development in Liverpool. Antipode, 47, 1021–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2016). The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2023–2040. doi:10.1177/0042098015586696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bortel, G., Mullins, D., & Gruis, V. (2010). ‘Change for the Better?’—making sense of housing association mergers in the Netherlands and England. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(3), 353–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, H., Dol, C., & Oxley, M. J. (2011). Western European housing systems and the impact of the international financial crisis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26(3), 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, A. (2017). The Autonomous City. A history of urban squatting. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Vey, J. (2016). Crisis protests in Germany, Occupy Wall Street, and Mietshäuser Syndikat: Antinomies of current Marxist- and anarchist- inspired movements and their convergence. Capital & Class, 40(1), 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. (Ed.). (2010). Living together – Co-housing ideas and realities around the world. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology Division of Urban Studies in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU.
   Google Scholar