A methodological quest for systematic literature mapping

References

• Anderson, J.T., & Collins, D. (2014). Prevalence and causes of urban homelessness among indigenous peoples: A three-country scoping review. Housing Studies, 29, 959–976. doi:10.1080/02673037.2014.923091
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2004). The evidence on the impact of gentrification: New lessons for the urban renaissance? European Journal of Housing Policy, 4(1), 107–131. doi:10.1080/1461671042000215479
   Google Scholar
• Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59–70. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
   Google Scholar
• Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2011). Pajek Software. Retrieved from: http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pajek/
   Google Scholar
• Blandy, S., Lister, D., Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2003). Gated communities: A systematic review of the research evidence. Working Paper No. 12. Glasgow/Bristol: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, L., Sautkina, E., & Kearns, A. (2011). Mixed messages about mixed tenure: Do reviews tell the real story? Housing Studies, 26(1), 69–94. doi:10.1080/02673037.2010.512752
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1979). Public opinion does not exist. In A. Mattelart & S. Siegelaub (Eds.), Communication and class struggle (pp. 124–130). New York: International General.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2013). What works: Evidence centres for social policy. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., Tiesdel, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2010). Public places – urban spaces. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Cooper, K. (2011). A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 11–29. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-29
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2009). The rise of the network society. Hoboken, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, I. (2006). From optimism to disillusion about commitment to transparency in the medico-industrial complex. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 337–341. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.7.337
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1435–1443. doi:10.1177/1049732312452938
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, K., Quilgars, D., Wallace, A., Baldwin, S., & Mather, L. (2003). Paying the mortgage? A systematic literature review of safety nets for home-owners. York: Department of Social Policy and Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. (2017). Quantifying the environmental impact of ecovillages and co-housing communities: A systematic literature review. Local Environment, 22, 1358–1377. doi:10.1080/13549839.2017.1348342
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, E., Orgill, M., Schneider, H., & Gilson, L. (2014). Mapping the existing body of health policy implementation research in lower income settings: What is covered and what are the gaps? Health Policy and Planning, 29(suppl_3), iii35–iii50. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu063
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Benefield, P. (2001). Systematic reviews of educational research: Does the medical model fit? British Educational Research Journal, 27, 527–541. doi:10.1080/01411920120095717
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P., & Hammersley, M. (1998). A review of reviews: Structure and function in reviews of educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 609–663. doi:10.1080/0141192980240508
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D. (2013). Meta-narrative and realist reviews: Guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal. BMC Medicine, 11, 22. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-22
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Oliver, D., & Thomas, J. (2013). Learning from research: Systematic reviews for informing policy decisions. A quick guide. London: EPPI, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 21, 28. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 417–430. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Hagen-Zanker, J., & Mallett, R. (2013). How to do a rigorous, evidence-focused literature review in international development: A guidance note. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8572.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledge: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harkins, C. (2016). Public health implications of payday lending. Glasgow: GCPH.
   Google Scholar
• Hoolachan, J.E. (2016). Ethnography and homelessness research. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(1), 31–49. doi:10.1080/14616718.2015.1076625
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M.H. (2001). Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 270–282.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M.H., & O'Sullivan, J. (2003). Identity shifts as turning points in health behavior change. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 134–152.
   Google Scholar
• Krahn, J., Caine, V., Chaw-Kant, J., & Singh, A.E. (2018). Housing interventions for homeless, pregnant/parenting women with addictions: A systematic review. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 27(1), 75–88. doi:10.1080/10530789.2018.1442186
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Carriou, C., & Czischke, D. (2018). Collaborative housing research (1990–2017): A systematic review and thematic analysis of the field. Housing, Theory and Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14036096.2018.1536077
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Tamminen, K.A., Clark, A.M., Slater, L., Spence, J.C., & Holt, N.L. (2015). A meta-study of qualitative research examining determinants of children’s independent active free play. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 5. doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0165-9
   Google Scholar
• Lenoel, C., Matsu, J., & Naisbitt, B. (2018). International evidence review on housing taxation. Retrieved from https://housingevidence.ac.uk/publications/international-evidence-review-on-housing-taxation/.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, P., Johnsen, S., & Wood, J. (2017). Ending rough sleeping: What works? An international evidence review. Retrieved from https://www.crisis.org.uk/media/238368/ending_rough_sleeping_what_works_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malpass, A., Shaw, A., Sharp, D., Walter, F., Feder, G., Ridd, M., & Kessler, D. (2009). “Medication career” or “moral career”? The two sides of managing antidepressants: A meta-ethnography of patients' experience of antidepressants. Social Science & Medicine, 68(1), 154–168. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.068
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, E., & Steinberg, T. (2007). The power of information. Retrieved from https://ntouk.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/power_information.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, A., Pojani, D., & van Groenou, A.B. (2018). The application of renewable energy to social housing: A systematic review. Energy Policy, 114, 549–557. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.031
   Google Scholar
• Noblit, G.W., & Hare, R.D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H.T.O. (2003). From knowing to doing. Evaluation, 9, 125–148. doi:10.1177/1356389003009002002
   Google Scholar
• O'Campo, P., Kirst, M., Schaefer-McDaniel, N., Firestone, M., Scott, A., & McShane, K. (2009). Community-based services for homeless adults experiencing concurrent mental health and substance use disorders: A realist approach to synthesizing evidence. Journal of Urban Health, 86, 965–989. doi:10.1007/s11524-009-9392-1
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, L., & Croucher, K. (2005). Supported housing services for people with mental health problems: A scoping study. Housing Studies, 20, 831–845.
   Google Scholar
• Pound, P., Britten, N., Morgan, M., Yardley, L., Pope, C., Daker-White, G., & Campbell, R. (2005). Resisting medicines: A synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Social Science & Medicine, 61(1), 133–155. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Crawford, J., McKee, K., Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (2019). Understanding changing housing aspirations: A review of the evidence. Housing Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02673037.2019.1584665
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2018). Understanding housing aspirations and choices in changing contexts. Retrieved from https://housingevidence.ac.uk/publications/understanding-housing-aspirations-and-choices-in-changing-contexts/
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., & Bimpson, E. (2019). Forms and mechanisms of exclusion in contemporary housing systems: An evidence review. Retrieved from https://housingevidence.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/1904-Mechanisms-of-exclusion-evidence-review_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ronald, R. (2011). Ethnography and comparative housing research. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11, 415–437. doi:10.1080/14616718.2011.626605
   Google Scholar
• Roy, N., Dubé, R., Després, C., Freitas, A., & Légaré, F. (2018). Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults. PLoS One, 13, e0189266. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189266
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Voils, C.I., Leeman, J., & Crandell, J.L. (2012). Mapping the mixed methods–mixed research synthesis terrain. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 317–331. doi:10.1177/1558689811427913
   Google Scholar
• Serin, B. (2018a). Cross disciplinary review of placemaking literature. Retrieved from https://housingevidence.ac.uk/publications/cross-disciplinary-review-of-placemaking-literature/
   Google Scholar
• Serin, B. (2018b). Reviewing the housing supply literature. Retrieved from https://housingevidence.ac.uk/publications/reviewing-the-housing-supply-literature/
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38, 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268
   Google Scholar
• Soaita, A.M. (2018a). Literature mapping on housing taxation in the UK and other OECD countries. Retrieved from https://housingevidence.ac.uk/publications/mapping-the-literature-on-housing-taxation-in-the-uk-and-other-oecd-countries/.
   Google Scholar
• Soaita, A.M. (2018b). Mapping the literature of ‘policy transfer’ and housing. Retrieved from http://housingevidence.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/W2018_03_01_Soaita_policy_transfer_and_housing_mapping_v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Soaita, A.M., & Dewilde, C. (2019). A critical-realist view of housing quality within the post-communist EU states: Progressing towards a middle-range explanation. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(1), 44–75. doi:10.1080/14036096.2017.1383934
   Google Scholar
• Soaita, A.M., Searle, B.A., McKee, K., & Moore, T. (2017). Becoming a landlord: Property-based welfare and vulnerability in the private rental market in Great Britain. Housing Studies, 32, 613–637. doi:10.1080/02673037.2016.1228855
   Google Scholar
• Voils, C.I., Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Hasselblad, V. (2008). Making sense of qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed research synthesis studies. Field Methods, 20(1), 3–25. doi:10.1177/1525822X07307463
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, A., Bevan, M., Croucher, K., Jackson, K., O’Malley, L., & Orton, V. (2005). The impact of empty, second and holiday homes on the sustainability of rural communities: A systematic literature review. York: Centre for Housing Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, A., Croucher, K., Bevan, M., Jackson, K., O'Malley, L., & Quilgars, D. (2006). Evidence for policy making: Some reflections on the application of systematic reviews to housing research. Housing Studies, 21, 297–314. doi:10.1080/02673030500484935
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, A., Croucher, K., Quilgars, D., & Baldwin, S. (2004). Meeting the challenge: Developing systematic reviewing in social policy. Policy & Politics, 32, 455–470. doi:10.1332/0305573042009444
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Chau, C.K., Ng, W.Y., & Leung, T.M. (2016). A review on the effects of physical built environment attributes on enhancing walking and cycling activity levels within residential neighborhoods. Cities, 50, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). The Spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, N., Phillips, M., Ryan, K., Bursac, Z., & Ferguson, A. (2017). Examining the strength of state habitability laws across the United States of America. International Journal of Housing Policy, 17, 541–568. doi:10.1080/19491247.2016.1270609
   Google Scholar
• Woodhall-Melnik, J.R., & Dunn, J.R. (2016). A systematic review of outcomes associated with participation in Housing First programs. Housing Studies, 31, 287–304. doi:10.1080/02673037.2015.1080816
   Google Scholar