10,994
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Policy Review

The neo-liberal politics and socio-spatial implications of Dutch post-crisis social housing policies

&

References

  • Aalbers, M., Hochstenbach, C., Bosma, J., & Fernandez, R. (2019). The death and life of private landlordism: How financialized homeownership gave birth to the buy-to-let market. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Aalbers, M.B. (2016). Regulated deregulation. In: S. Springer, K. Birch & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 563–573). London: Routledge.
  • Aalbers, M.B., Van Loon, J., & Fernandez, R. (2017). The financialisation of a social housing provider. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 572–587.
  • Aedes. (2019). Corporatiemonitor: Knelpunten nieuwbouw. Den Haag: Aedes.
  • Blessing, A. (2012). Magical or monstrous? Hybridity in social housing governance. Housing Studies, 27(2), 189–207. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.649469
  • Blessing, A. (2015). Public, private, or in-between? The legitimacy of social enterprises in the housing market. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(1), 198–221. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9422-1
  • Boelhouwer, P. (2017). The role of government and financial institutions during a housing market crisis: A case study of the Netherlands. International Journal of Housing Policy, 17(4), 591–602. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1357399
  • Boelhouwer, P., & Priemus, H. (2014). Demise of the Dutch social housing tradition: Impact of budget cuts and political changes. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(2), 221–235.
  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.
  • CBS. (2018). Voorraad woningen; eigendom, type verhuurder, bewoning, regio. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau Voor de Statistiek, Statline.
  • CBS. (2019). Woonlasten huishoudens; kenmerken huishouden, woning. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau Voor de Statistiek, Statline.
  • Chen, Y.L. (2011). New prospects for social rental housing in Taiwan: The role of housing affordability crises and the housing movement. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(3), 305–318. doi:10.1080/14616718.2011.599133
  • Dieleman, F.M., & Musterd, S. (1991). Maatschappelijke veranderingen en de herstructurering van de Randstad. Geografisch Tijdschrift, 25(5), 490–501.
  • Ekkers, P.D.J., & Helderman, J.K. (2010). Van volkshuisvesting naar woonbeleid. The Hague: SDU Uitgevers.
  • Fitzpatrick, S., & Stephens, M. (2008). The Future of Social Housing. London: Shelter.
  • Forrest, R., & Murie, A. (1983). Residualization and council housing: Aspects of the changing social relations of housing tenure. Journal of Social Policy, 12(4), 453–468. doi:10.1017/S0047279400013088
  • Goetz, E. G. (2003). Clearing the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  • Gualthérie van Weezel, T. (2014). Zeven zonden van woningcorporaties: Van cruiseschip tot Maserati. De Volkskrant. Retrieved from https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/zeven-zonden-van-woningcorporaties-van-cruiseschip-tot-maserati∼bb8771a3/
  • Hacker, J.S., Pierson, P., & Thelen, K. (2015). Drift and conversion: Hidden faces of institutional change. In: J. Mahony & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 180–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hendriks, P. (2018). Hoe word je rijk met sociale woningen? De overheid legt het buitenlandse beleggers uit. Follow the Money. Retrieved from https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/buitenlandse-beleggers-corporatiewoningen?share=1
  • Hochstenbach, C., & Arundel, R. (2019). Spatial housing market polarisation: National and urban dynamics of diverging house values. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1111/tran.12346
  • Hochstenbach, C., & Ronald, R. (2018). The revival of the private rental sector under Amsterdam’s regulated marketisation regime. Centre for Urban Studies Working Paper Series No. 34.
  • Hochstenbach, C., & van Gent, W. (2018). Betaalbaar wonen verder weggedrukt: De sociale en ruimtelijke implicaties van de Woningwet 2015. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Hoekstra, J. (2017). Reregulation and residualisation in Dutch social housing: A critical evaluation of new policies. Critical Housing Analysis, 4(1), 31–39. doi:10.13060/23362839.2017.4.1.322
  • Jacobs, K. (2019). Neoliberal housing policy: An international perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jacobs, K., & Manzi, T. (2013). New localism, old retrenchment: The “Big Society”, housing policy and the politics of welfare reform. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(1), 29–45. doi:10.1080/14036096.2012.683293
  • Larner, W. (2003). Neoliberalism? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(5), 509–512. doi:10.1068/d2105ed
  • Madden, D., & Marcuse, P. (2016). In defense of housing. The politics of crisis. London: Verso.
  • Magnusson, L., & Turner, B. (2008). Municipal housing companies in Sweden–social by default. Housing, Theory and Society, 25(4), 275–296. doi:10.1080/14036090701657397
  • Malpass, P. (2004). Fifty years of British housing policy: Leaving or leading the welfare state? European Journal of Housing Policy, 4(2), 209–227. doi:10.1080/1461671042000269038
  • Miltenburg, E.M. (2017). A different place to different people: Conditional neighbourhood effects on residents’ socio-economic status. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Ministerie van BZK. (2015). Circulaire: Aanpassingen woningwaarderingsstelsel (MG 2015-04 2014-0000685462). Den Haag: Ministerie Van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijkrelaties
  • Ministerie van BZK. (2018). Staat van de Volkshuisvesting—Jaarrapportage 2018. Den Haag: Ministerie Van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijkrelaties.
  • Musterd, S. (2014). Public housing for whom? Experiences in an era of mature neo-liberalism: The Netherlands and Amsterdam. Housing Studies, 29(4), 467–484. doi:10.1080/02673037.2013.873393
  • Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2008). Integrated urban renewal in The Netherlands: A critical appraisal. Urban Research & Practice, 1(1), 78–92. doi:10.1080/17535060701795389
  • Musterd, S., & van Gent, W. P. C. (2016). Changing welfare context and income segregation in Amsterdam and its metropolitan area, 2004–2011. In T. Tammaru, S. Marcińczak, M. van Ham, & S. Musterd (Eds.), Socio-economic segregation in European capital cities; East meets west (pp. 55–79). London: Routledge.
  • Nieboer, N., & Gruis, V. (2014). Shifting back-changing organisational strategies in Dutch social housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10901-012-9329-y
  • Orchard, L., & Arthurson, K. (2005). Housing. In J. Spoehr (Ed.), State of South Australia, trends and issues (pp. 214–227) Adelaide: Wakefield Press.
  • Oudenampsen, M., & Mellink, A.G.M. (2019). Bureaucrats first: The leading role of policy makers in the Dutch paradigm-shift of the 1980s. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • PBL. (2016) Betaalrisico’s in de huur- en koopsector, 2002-2015. Pbl: Compendium Voor de Leefomgeving. Retrieved from http://www.clo.nl/indicatoren/nl2174-toenemende-betaalrisicos-wonen?i=35-171
  • Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179. doi:10.1353/wp.1996.0004
  • Priemus, H. (2014). Is the landlord levy a threat to the rented housing sector? The case of the Netherlands. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(1), 98–106. doi:10.1080/14616718.2013.876579
  • Priemus, H., & Gruis, V. (2011). Social housing and illegal state aid: The agreement between European commission and Dutch government. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(1), 89–104. doi:10.1080/14616718.2011.548588
  • Romanos, E. (2014). Evictions, petitions and escraches: Contentious housing in austerity Spain. Social Movement Studies, 13(2), 296–302. doi:10.1080/14742837.2013.830567
  • Ronald, R., & Dol, K. (2011). Housing in the Netherlands before and after the global financial crisis. In R. Forrest and N.M. Yip (Eds.), Housing markets and the global financial crisis: The uneven impact on households (pp. 93–112). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Savini, F. (2017). Planning, uncertainty and risk: The neoliberal logics of Amsterdam urbanism. Environment and Planning A, 49(4), 857–875. doi:10.1177/0308518X16684520
  • Scanlon, K., Fernández Arrigoitia, M., & Whitehead, C. (2015). Social housing in Europe. European Policy Analysis, (17), 1–12.
  • Schutjens, V.A., Van Kempen, R., & Van Weesep, J. (2002). The changing tenant profile of Dutch social rented housing. Urban Studies, 39(4), 643–664. doi:10.1080/00420980220119507
  • SCP. (2017). Sociale staat van Nederland 2017. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau
  • Uitermark, J., Hochstenbach, C., & van Gent, W. (2017). The statistical politics of exceptional territories. Political Geography, 57, 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.11.011
  • Van Gent, W.P.C. (2010a). Housing context and social transformation strategies in neighbourhood regeneration in Western European cities. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 63–87. doi:10.1080/14616710903565712
  • Van Gent, W.P.C. (2010b). Housing policy as a lever for change? The politics of welfare, assets and tenure. Housing Studies, 25(5), 735–753. doi:10.1080/02673037.2010.483588
  • Van Gent, W.P.C. (2013). Neo-liberalization, housing institutions and variegated gentrification; How the ‘third wave’ broke in Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 503–522. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01155.x
  • Van Ham, M., Hedman, L., Manley, D., Coulter, R., & Östh, J. (2014). Intergenerational transmission of neighbourhood poverty: An analysis of neighbourhood histories of individuals. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(3), 402–417. doi:10.1111/tran.12040
  • Van Kempen, R., & Priemus, H. (2002). Revolution in social housing in the Netherlands: Possible effects of new housing policies. Urban Studies, 39(2), 237–253. doi:10.1080/00420980120102948
  • Van Middelkoop, M., & Schilder, F. (2017). Middeninkomens op de woningmarkt. Ruimte op een krap speelveld. Den Haag: Planbureau Voor de Leefomgeving.