Housing policies in Turkey post 2002

References

• Akalın, M. (2016). Sosyal konutların Türkiye’nin konut politikaları içerisindeki yeri ve TOKİ'nin sosyal konut uygulamaları. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26(1), 107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Akın, O., & Özdemir, D. (2010). Konut üretim sürecinde Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme ve TOKİ uygulamaları. In D. Özdemir (Ed.), Kentsel Dönüşümde Politika, Mevzuat, Uygulama: Avrupa Deneyimi, İstanbul Uygulamaları (pp. 285–316). Nobel Yayın.
   Google Scholar
• Arslanalp, M. (2018). Coalitional politics of housing policy in AKP’s Turkey. In M. Lynch, M. Cammett, & K. Fabbe (Eds.), Social policy in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 25–33). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, A. S. (2019). Barınma problemine çözüm olarak sunulan ipotekli konut kredilerine erişilebilirliğin değerlendirilmesi. Megaron, 14(EK 1), 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Ayan, E., & Eken, S. (2021). Detection of price bubbles in Istanbul housing market using LSTM autoencoders: A district-based approach. Soft Computing, 25(12), 7957–7973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05677-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban, O. (2012). The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey: Unraveling the role of the public sector. Habitat International, 36(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bektaş, Y., & Türkün, A. (2017). Kentsel dönüşümde karma gelirli konut stratejisi ve Türkiye’ye özgü dinamikler: Ankara Altındağ-Gültepe örneği. Megaron, 11(2), 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Bican, N. B. (2020). Public mass housing practices in Turkey: The urgent need for research-based spatial decision-making. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35(2), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09692-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, R. M., Kallergis, A., & Wainer, L. (2016). The emergence of large-scale housing programs: Beyond a public finance perspective. Habitat International, 54, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, R., & Mayo, S. (1989). Housing policy in developing economies: Evaluating the macroeconomic impacts. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 1(2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.1989.tb00011.x
   Google Scholar
• Buğra, A. (2000). Devlet Piyasa Karşıtlığının Ötesinde: İhtiyaçlar ve Tüketim Üzerine Yazılar. İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Ö. (2021). The roles of the state in the financialisation of housing in Turkey. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1928003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Hao, Q., & Stephens, M. (2010). Assessing housing affordability in postreform China: A case study of Shanghai. Housing Studies, 25(6), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2010.511153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. P. (2014). The new Chinese model of public housing: A step forward or backward? Housing Studies, 29(4), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.873392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çoban, A. N. (2012). Cumhuriyetin ilanindan günümüze konut politikasi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 67(03), 75–108.
   Google Scholar
• Coşkun, Y., & Yalçıner, K. (2014). İpotekli konut finansmanı sisteminde gelir/servet kısıtı ve sonuçları: Yoksulluk, gecekondu olgusu ve TOKİ için bazı öneriler. SosyoEkonomi, 21(1), 235–264.
   Google Scholar
• Ergüven, E. (2020). The political economy of housing financialization in Turkey: Links with and contradictions to the accumulation model. Housing Policy Debate, 30(4), 559–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2019.1681017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GDNP. (2022). General Directorate of National Property Annual Reports 2005–2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gürakar, E. Ç. (2018). Kayırma ekonomisi. İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Gürakar, E. Ç., & Bircan, T. (2018). Redistributive politics, clientelism, and political patronage under the AKP. In L. R. De Elvira, C. H. Schwarz, & I. Weipert-Fenner (Eds.), Clientelism and Patronage in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 83–109). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gürakar, E. Ç., & Bircan, T. (2019). Political connections and public procurement in Turkey: Evidence from construction work contracts. In I. Diwan, A. Malik, & I. Atiyas (Eds.), Crony capitalism in the Middle East: Business and politics from liberalization to the arab spring (pp. 236–262). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198799870.003.0009
   Google Scholar
• Gürkaynak, R. S., & Böke, S. S. (2013). AKP döneminde Türkiye ekonomisi. Birikim, 296, 64–69.
   Google Scholar
• HDA. (2006). Müşteriye danışma süreci araştırma çalışması. TOKİ Araştırma Dizisi 3.
   Google Scholar
• HDA. (2019). HDA corporate profile document. http://i.toki.gov.tr/content/entities/main-page-slider/20191011095737969524-pdf.pdf,27.11
   Google Scholar
• Keleş, R. (2012). Kentleşme politikası. İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. (2006). Choice and the end of social housing. IEA Research Paper, 155.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T. (2018). Politics of urban regeneration in Turkey: Possibilities and limits of municipal regeneration initiatives in a highly centralized country. Urban Geography, 39(8), 1152–1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1440125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, C. K. Y., & Ng, C. Y. J. (2019). Macroeconomic aspects of housing. In J. H. Hamilton, A. Dixit, S. Edwards, & K. Judd (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of economics and finance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.294
   Google Scholar
• Lima, V. (2018). Social housing under the Workers’ Party government: An analysis of the private sector in Brazil. Third World Quarterly, 39(8), 1640–1655. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1408406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschall, M., Aydogan, A., & Bulut, A. (2016). Does housing create votes? Explaining the electoral success of the AKP in Turkey. Electoral Studies, 42, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFSS. (2022). Ministry of family and social services annual reports 2011–2021. https://www.aile.gov.tr/raporlar/yillik-faaliyet-raporlari/
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge University Press. Chapters 15 and 22.
   Google Scholar
• Orhan, R. (2017, April 20–23). Küreselleşme sürecinde soylulaştırmanın mekâna yansıması: İstanbul Sulukule örneği [Paper presentation]. Proceedings Book of 2nd International Scientific Researches Congress on Humanities and Social Sciences, İstanbul (pp. 74–84).
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, M., & Smith, J. (1996). Housing policy and rented housing in Europe. E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, D. (2011). The role of the public sector in the provision of housing supply in Turkey, 1950–2009. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6), 1099–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00974.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir-Sarı, Ö. B., & Aksoy-Khurami, E. (2018). Housing affordability trends and challenges in the Turkish case. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9617-2
   Google Scholar
• Palancioglu, H. M., & Cete, M. (2014). The Turkish way of housing supply and finance for low-and middle-income people. Land Use Policy, 39, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. S. (1985). Housing subsidies: Effects on housing decisions, efficiency, and equity. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 1, pp. 375–420). Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sarioglu-Erdogdu, G. P. (2014). Housing development and policy change: What has changed in Turkey in the last decade in the owner-occupied and rented sectors? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, U. (2019). State-led housing development in Brazil and India: A machinery for enabling strategy? International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(4), 509–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1510076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, U., Murtagh, B., D’Ottaviano, C., & Pasternak, S. (2018). Between enabling and provider approach: Key shifts in the national housing policy in India and Brazil. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(5), 856–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., Chen, J., & Wang, H. (2016). Affordable housing policy in China: New developments and new challenges. Habitat International, 54, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuid, S. (2016). The housing provision system in Malaysia. Habitat International, 54, 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solak, A. O. (2021). Squatter housing transformations in Turkey after 2002: Public choice perspective. International Journal of Housing Policy, 21(4), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2021.1964204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TBB (The Banks Association of Turkey). (2022). www.tbb.org.tr.
   Google Scholar
• Tokihaber. (2022). Statement of HDA President (Ömer Bulut) in the Public Economic Enterprises Commission of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. No: 149 (July), pp. 18–21. https://www.tokihaber.com.tr/sayi-149/
   Google Scholar
• TUIK. (n.d.a). Building permits statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=insaat-ve-konut-116&dil=1
   Google Scholar
• TUIK. (n.d.b). Consumer price ındices. Turkish Statistical Institute. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Enflasyon-ve-Fiyat-106
   Google Scholar
• TUIK. (n.d.c). House sales statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=insaat-ve-konut-116&dil=1
   Google Scholar
• Türel, A., & Koç, H. (2015). Housing production under less-regulated market conditions in Turkey. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9393-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk, S. S., & Korthals-Altes, W. K. (2010). The planning system and land provision for social housing in Turkey. Housing Finance International, 25(1), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Court of Accounts. (2014). Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığı 2013 yılı denetim raporu. http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/rapor/kit/2013/54-TOKİ%202013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Uzunçarşılı-Baysal, C. (2013). Civilizing the Kurdish population of Ayazma: Ayazma/Tepeüstü urban transformation project-Küçükçekmece. İstanbul. Planning, 23(2), 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. P. (2001). Urban housing reform and finance in China a case study of Beijing. Urban Affairs Review, 36(5), 620–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122185028[Mismatch[Mismatch
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. P., & Murie, A. (2011). The new affordable and social housing provision system in China: Implications for comparative housing studies. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2011.599130
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, C. M. E. (2003). The economics of soical housing. İn T. O’Sullivan & K. Gibb (Eds.), Housing economics and public policy (pp. 135–192). Blackwell Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Yeşilbağ, M. (2020). The state-orchestrated financialization of housing in Turkey. Housing Policy Debate, 30(4), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2019.1670715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Y. (2014). Contradictions in China’s affordable housing policy: Goals vs. structure. Habitat International, 41, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar