Seismic response evaluation of bridges under differential ground motion: a comparison with the new Algerian provisions

References

• Benmansour, N. (2004). Étude du comportement dynamique des barrages voûtes face au mouvement sismique différentiel (Magister Thesis). University Abou Bakr Belkaid, Tlemcen, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Boukli Hacene , I.M. and Rachedi , M. 2010 . Elaboration d’un logiciel de traitement de signal sismique (Internal repport) , Tlemcen , Algeria : University Abou Bakr Belkaid .
   Google Scholar
• Burdette , N. and Elnashai , A.S. 2007 . The effect of asynchronous earthquake motion on complex bridges, Part 2: Results and implications on Assessment . Journal of Bridge Engineering , 13 : 166 – 172 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. (2005a). Eurocode 8: Design provisions of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 2: Bridges (prEN1998-2, Final Draft). Brussels: CEN [Comité Européen de Normalisation].
   Google Scholar
• CEN. (2005b). Eurocode 8: Design provisions of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, Seismic Actions and rules for Building (prEN1998-2, Final Draft). Brussels: CEN [Comité Européen de Normalisation].
   Google Scholar
• Deodatis, G. (1997). Simulation of stochastic processes and fields to model loading and material uncertainties. In C. Guedes Soares (Ed.), Probabilistic methods for Structural Design, 56, 261–288. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Der Kiureghian , A. 1996 . A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 25 : 99 – 111 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FHWA. (1996). Seismic design of bridges design example no. 1 – Two-span continuous CIP concrete bridge. Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-SA-97-006. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Harichandran , R.S. and Vanmarcke , E. 1986 . Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time . Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE , 112 : 154 – 174 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredia-Zavoni , E. and Santa-Cruz , S. 2000 . Conditional simulation of a class of nonstationary space-time random fields . Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE , 126 : 398 – 404 .
   Google Scholar
• Liao , S. and Zerva , A. 2006 . Physically-compliant, conditionally simulated spatially variable seismic ground motions for performance-based design . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 35 : 891 – 919 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou , L. and Zerva , A. 2005 . Effects of spatially variable ground motions on the seismic response of a skewed, multi-span bridge . Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 25 : 729 – 740 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupoi , A. , Franchin , P. , Pinto , P.E. and Monti , G. 2005 . Seismic design of bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 34 : 327 – 348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti , G. , Nuti , C. and Pinto , P.E. 1996 . Nonlinear response of bridges under multi-support excitation . Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE , 122 : 1147 – 1159 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MTP . 2010 . Règles parasismiques applicables au domaine des ouvrages d’art , Alger : Ministère des Travaux Publics .
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, A., Halldorsson, B., & Dong, G. (2002). TARSCTH ([A computer program for] Target Acceleration Spectra Compatible Time Histories). Engineering Seismology Laboratory (ESL), the State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, V. (2000). Spatial variation of earthquake ground motion and development of bridge fragility curves (PhD dissertation), Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sextos , A.G. and Kappos , A.J. 2009 . Evaluation of seismic response of bridges under asynchronous excitation and comparisons with Eurocode 8–2 provisions . Bulletin Earthquake Engineering , 7 : 519 – 545 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sextos, A.G., Kappos, A.J., & Mergos, P. (2004). Effect of soil–structure interaction and spatial variability of ground motion on irregular bridges: The case of the Krystallopigi Bridge. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, CD ROM, Paper No. 2298.
   Google Scholar
• Sextos , A.G. , Pitilakis , K.D. and Kappos , A.J. 2003 . Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil–structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: Parametric study . Earthquake Engineering , 32 : 629 – 652 .
   Google Scholar
• Shama , A. 2007 . Simplified procedure for simulating spatially correlated earthquake ground motions . Engineering Structures , 29 : 248 – 258 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , J. , Carr , A.J. , Cooke , N. and Moss , P.J. 2009 . The response of a 344 m long bridge to non-uniform earthquakeground motions . Engineering Structures , 31 : 2554 – 2567 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerva , A. 2009 . Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: modeling and engineering applications , Boca Raton Florida : CRC Press Group Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Zerva , A. and Zervas , V. 2002 . Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview . Applied Mechanics Review (ASME) , 55 : 271 – 297 .
   Google Scholar