Methodology and tools for risk evaluation in construction projects using Risk Breakdown Structure

References

• Aleshin , A. 2001 . Risk management of international projects in Russia . International Journal of Project Management , 19 : 207 – 222 .
   Google Scholar
• Almeida-Dias , J. , Figueira , J.R. and Roy , B. 2010 . Electre Tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions . European Journal of Operational Research , 204 : 565 – 580 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baloi , D. and Price , A.D.F. 2003 . Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance . International Journal of Project Management , 21 : 261 – 269 .
   Google Scholar
• Breysse, D. (2009). Maîtrise des risques de projet, Vol. 2: Maîtrise et gestion des risques dans l’aménagement et la construction, Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.
   Google Scholar
• Carr , V. and Tah , J.H.M. 2001 . A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system . Advances in Engineering Software , 32 : 847 – 857 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan , D.W.M. and Kumaraswamy , M. 1997 . A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects . International Journal of Project Management , 15 : 55 – 63 .
   Google Scholar
• Chapman , C.B. 2001 . The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management . International Journal of Project Management , 19 : 147 – 160 .
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.F., & Chapman, C.B. (1987). Risk analysis for large projects: Models, methods, and cases. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Davies , G.B. and Satchell , S.E. 2007 . The behavioural components of risk aversion . Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 51 : 1 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad , S. , Mousavi , S.M. and Seyrafianpour , H. 2010 . Risk identification and assessment for build–operate–transfer projects: A fuzzy multi attribute decision making model . Expert Systems with Applications , 37 : 575 – 586 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsberg , D. 1961 . Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 75 : 643 – 669 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sayegh , S.M. 2008 . Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry . International Journal of Project Management , 26 : 431 – 438 .
   Google Scholar
• Epstein , L.G. 1999 . A definition of uncertainty aversion . The Review of Economic Studies , 66 : 579 – 608 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GERMA (2011). Gestion des Risques liés au Management des projets complexes de Génie Civil (Final report). Agence Nationale de la Recherche and Agence de l’Environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hillson, D. (2002). Use a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) to understand your risks. Proceedings of the project management institute annual seminars & symposium, October 3–10, San Antonio, TX, USA. Available at http://www.risk-doctor.com/pdf-files/rbs1002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hillson , D. , Grimaldi , S. and Rafele , C. 2006 . Managing project risks using cross risk breakdown matrix . Risk Management , 8 : 61 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Holzmann , V. and Spiegler , I. 2010 . Developing risk breakdown structure for information technology organizations . International Journal of Project Management , 29 : 537 – 546 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. (2009). ISO guide 73, risk management – vocabulary. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization..
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood , A.S. 1994 . Why do we worry when scientists say there is no risk? . Disaster Prevention and Management , 3 : 15 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Macgill , S.M. and Siu , Y.L. 2005 . A new paradigm for risk analysis . Futures , 37 : 1105 – 1131 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh, R. (2012). Dynamic and multi-perspective risk management of construction projects using tailor-made Risk Breakdown Structures (PhD thesis). Bordeaux University, I2M-GCE, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh , R. , Breysse , D. and Chaplain , D. 2011 . “ Modeling methodology of the Risk Breakdown Structure for project risk management in construction ” . In Application of the statistics and probability in civil engineering , Edited by: Nishijima , K. London : Taylor & Francis Group .
   Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh, R., Breysse, D., Taillandier, F., & Niandou, H. (2011). Advanced methodology of risk breakdown structure developing for risk management of tunneling and construction projects. 29èmes Rencontres Universitaires de Génie Civil, Université AbouBekr Belkaid (p. 3, pp 80--89), Tlemcen, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Mousseau , V. , Figueira , J. and Naux , J.P. 2001 . Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results . European Journal of Operational Research , 130 : 263 – 275 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau , V. , Slowinski , R. and Zielniewicz , P. 2000 . A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support . Computers & Operations Research , 27 : 757 – 777 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipattanapiwong, J. (2004). Development of multi-party risk and uncertainty management process for an infrastructure project (PhD thesis). Kochi University of Technology, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute Standards Committee (PMI) . 2008 . A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) , 4th ed. , Newtown Square , PA : PMI .
   Google Scholar
• Raz , T. and Michael , E. 2001 . Use and benefit of tools for project risk management . International Journal of Project Management , 19 : 9 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Roy , B. 2010 . Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faceted issue . European Journal of Operational Research , 200 : 629 – 638 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy , B. and Bouyssou , D. 1993 . Aide multicritère à la décision: Méthodes et cas , Paris : Economica .
   Google Scholar
• Tah , J.H.M. and Carr , V. 2001 . Towards a framework for project risk knowledge management in the construction supply chain . Advances in Engineering Software , 32 : 835 – 846 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillandier, F., Hamzaoui, F., Medizadeh, R., & Breysse, D. (2012). Gestion des projets de construction par des RBS évolutives – Application à un réseau de voie ferrée en Algérie. 7èmes Journées Nationales de Fiabilité, fiabilité des matériaux et des structures, Chambéry, 4–6 June.
   Google Scholar
• Taillandier, F., Mehdizadeh, R., & Breysse, D. (2011). Evaluation et agrégation des risques pour les projets de construction par le recours aux Risk Breakdown Structures. 29ièmes rencontres de l’AUGC Université AbouBekr Belkaid (p. 3, pp. 90--99). 29–31 May 2011, Tlemcen, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Tam , V.W.Y. , Shen , L.Y. , Tam , C.M. and Pang , W.W.S. 2007 . Investigating the intentional quality risks in public foundation projects: A Hong Kong study . Building and Environment , 42 : 330 – 343 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. 1992 . Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 5 : 297 – 323 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Neumann , J. and Morgenstern , O. 1947 . The theory of games and economic behaviour , Princeton : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W. (1992). Aide multicritère à la décision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri: Concepts, méthodes et applications (PhD thesis). Dauphine, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharias , O. , Panopoulos , D. and Askounis , D.Th. 2008 . Large scale program risk analysis using a risk breakdown structure . European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences , 12 : 170 – 181 .
   Google Scholar
• Zou , P.X.W. , Zhang , G. and Wang , J. 2007 . Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China . International Journal of Project Management , 25 : 601 – 614 .
   Google Scholar