Undrained strength of clays derived from pressuremeter tests

References

• Amar , S. and Jézéquel , J.F. 1972 . Essais en place et en laboratoire sur sols cohérents: comparaison des résultats . Bulletin de Liaison des Ponts et Chaussées , 58 : 97 – 108 .
   Google Scholar
• Baguelin , F. , Jezequel , J.F. , Lemée , E. and LeMéhauté , A. 1972 . Expansion of cylindrical probes in cohesive soils . Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division , 98 ( 11 ) : 1129 – 1142 .
   Google Scholar
• Baguelin , F. , Jézéquel , J.F. and Shields , D.H. 1978 . The pressuremeter and foundation engineering , Switzerland : Trans Tech Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Bahar, R. (1992). Analyse numérique de l’essai pressiométrique: application à l’identification de paramètres de comportement des sols (Thèse de doctorat). Ecole Centrale de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Bahar, R., & Olivari, G. (1993). Analyse de la réponse du modèle de Prager généralisé sur chemin pressiométrique. Actes du 6ème Colloque Franco-Polonais de Mécanique des Sols Appliquée Douai, France, 20–23 September (pp. 97–104). Ecole des Mines de Douai.
   Google Scholar
• Bahar , R. , Cambou , B. and Fry , J.J. 1995 . Forecast of creep settlements of heavy structures using pressuremeter tests . Computers and Geotechnics , 17 : 507 – 521 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar, R. (1998). Interpretation of pressuremeter tests carried out in stiff clays. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Site Characterisation (ISC’98), Atlanta, USA, 26–28 May (pp. 735–740). Rotterdam: Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Bahar, R., Abed, Y., & Olivari, G. (1999). Theoretical analysis of the behaviour of clays around a pressuremeter. Proceedings of the 12th African Regional Conference, Durban, South Africa, 25–27 October (pp. 135–142). Rotterdam: Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Bahar, R., Aissaoui, T., & Kelanemer, S. (2005). Comparison of some methods to evaluate the undrained cohesion of clays. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, Japan, vol. 2, 12–16 September (pp. 667–670). Rotterdam: Millpress.
   Google Scholar
• Boubanga, A. (1990). Identification de paramètres de comportement des sols à partir de l’essai pressiométrique (Thèse de doctorat). Ecole Centrale de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Cambou , B. and Bahar , R. 1993 . Utilisation de l’essai pressiométrique pour l’identification de paramètres intrinsèques du comportement d’un sol . Revue Française de Géotechnique , 63 : 39 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Cassan , M. 1978 . Les essais in situ en mécanique des sols , Vol. 1 , Paris : Eyrolles .
   Google Scholar
• CTELAB. (2008). Rapport de sol du site du nouveau siège d’Air Algérie. Algier’s: Construction and Testing Engineering Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Denby, G.M. (1978). Self-boring pressuremeter study of the San Francisco Bay mud (PhD thesis). Stanford University, California.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J.M., & Chang, C.Y. (1970). Non linear analysis of stress and strain in soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, SM5, 1629–1653.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira , R. and Robertson , P.K. 1992 . Interpretation of undrained self-boring pressuremeter test results incorporating unloading . Canadian Geotechnical Journal , 29 : 918 – 928 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioravante , V. , Jamiolkowski , M. and Lancellotta , R. 1994 . An analysis of pressuremeter holding tests . Geotechnique , 44 ( 2 ) : 227 – 238 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson , R.E. and Anderson , W.F. 1961 . In-situ measurement of soils properties with the pressuremeter . Civil Engineering and Public Works Review , 56 : 615 – 618 .
   Google Scholar
• Habib, P., La résistance au cisaillement des sols (Thèse de doctorat). Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Iwan, W.D. (1967). On a class of models for the yielding behaviour of continuous and composite systems. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 34, 612–617.
   Google Scholar
• Itasca, FLAC3D. 2005. Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua. User’s manual. Minneapolis: Itasca Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jang , I.S. , Chung , C.K. , Kim , M.M. and Cho , S.M. 2003 . Numerical assessment on the consolidation characteristics of clays from strain holding, self-boring pressuremeter test . Computers and Geotechnics , 30 : 121 – 140 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies , M.G. 1988 . Determination of horizontal geostatic stress in clay with self bored pressuremeter . Canadian Geotechnical Journal , 25 : 559 – 573 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladanyi , B. 1972 . In-situ determination of undrained stress-strain behaviour of sensitive clays with the pressuremeter . Canadian Geotechnical Journal , 9 ( 3 ) : 313 – 319 .
   Google Scholar
• LNHC. (2006). Rapport de sol du site du projet galvatube, Annaba. Laboratoire National de l’Habitat et de la Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Ménard, L. (1957). Mesures in situ des propriétés physiques des sols. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, l.3, 357–376.
   Google Scholar
• Monnet , J. and Chemaa , T. 1995 . Etude théorique et expérimentale de l’équilibre élasto-plastique d’un sol cohérent autour du pressiomètre . Revue française de Géotechnique , 73 : 15 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Monnet, J. (2007). Numerical validation of an elastoplastic formulation of the conventional limit pressure measured with the pressuremeter test in cohesive soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(9), September, 1119–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Mróz , Z. 1967 . On the description of anisotropic work hardening . Journal of Mechanical and Physical Solids , 15 : 163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder , J.A. and Mead , R. 1965 . A simplex method for function minimisation . The Computer Journal , 7 : 308 – 313 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivari, G., & Bahar, R. (1995). Response of generalised Prager’s model on pressuremeter path. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pressuremeter, Sherbrooke, Canada, 17–19 May (pp. 207–213). Rotterdam: Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer , A.C. 1972 . Undrained plain strain expansion of a cylindrical cavity in clays: a simple interpretation of the pressuremeter test . Geotechnique , 22 ( 3 ) : 451 – 457 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevost, J.H., & Hoeg, K. (1975). Analysis of pressuremeter in strain-softening soil. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 101, GT8, 717–731.
   Google Scholar
• Rangeard , D. , Hicher , P.Y. and Zentar , R. 2003 . Determining soil permeability from pressuremeter tests . International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics , 27 : 1 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiffsteck, P. (2006). Portance et tassements d’une fondation profonde – Présentation des résultats du concours de prévision. Comptes rendus Symposium international 50 ans de pressiomètres (ISP 5), Marne-la-Vallée, 22–24 août 2005, 2, 521–535.
   Google Scholar
• Salençon , J. 1966 . Expansion quasi-statique d’une cavité à symétrie sphérique ou cylindrique dans un milieu élastoplastique . Annales des Ponts et Chaussées , 3 : 175 – 187 .
   Google Scholar
• Thevanayagam, S., Chameau, J.L., & Altschaeffl, A.G. (1994). Some aspects of pressuremeter test interpretation in clays. Geotechnique, 44(2), 319–,334.
   Google Scholar
• Wroth , C.P. 1984 . The interpretation of in situ soil tests. 24th Rankine lecture . Geotechnique , 34 : 449 – 489 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentar , R. , Hicher , P.Y. and Moulin , G. 2001 . Identification of soil parameters by inverse analysis . Computers and Geotechnics , 28 ( 2 ) : 129 – 144 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar