Soil–structure interaction effects on seismic behaviour of multistorey structures

References

• Aksoylar , N. D. , Elnashai , A. S. and Mahmoud , H. 2011 . The design and seismic performance of low-rise long-span frames with semi-rigid connections . Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 67 : 114 – 126 .
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1978). Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. ATC-3-06. Redwood City, CL: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC-40. Redwood City, CL: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2008). Quantification of building seismic performance factors. ATC-63. Redwood City, CL: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Aviles , J. and Perez-Rocha , L. E. 2003 . Soil structure interaction on yielding systems . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 32 : 1749 – 1771 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviles , J. and Perez-Rocha , L. E. 2005a . Design concepts for yielding structures on flexible foundation . Engineering Structures , 27 : 443 – 454 .
   Google Scholar
• Aviles , J. and Perez-Rocha , L. E. 2005b . Influence of foundation flexibility on Rμ and Cμ factors . Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE , 131 : 221 – 230 .
   Google Scholar
• Aviles , J. and Perez-Rocha , L. E. 2011 . Use of global ductility for design of structure-foundation systems . Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 31 : 1018 – 1026 .
   Google Scholar
• Barcena , A. and Esteva , L. 2007 . Influence of dynamic soil–structure interaction on the nonlinear response and seismic reliability of multistorey systems . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 36 : 327 – 346 . doi: 10.1002/eqe.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertero, V. V. (1977). Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments. In K. S. Pister (Ed.), Structural engineering and structural mechanics (pp. 211–215). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick , B. M. and Elnashai , A. S. 1996 . Seismic response of composite frames–I. Response criteria and input motions . Engineering Structures , 18 : 696 – 706 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra , A. K. and Gutierrez , J. A. 1974 . Earthquake response analysis of multistorey building including foundation interaction . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 3 : 65 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• Chopra , A. K. and Chintanapakdee , C. 2004 . Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: Single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems . Journal of Structural Engineering , 130 : 1309 – 1319 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciampoli , M. and Pinto , P. E. 1995 . Effects of soil–structure interaction on inelastic seismic response of bridge piers . Journal of Structural Engineering , 121 : 806 – 814 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crémer , C. , Pecker , A. and Davenne , L. 2002 . Modelling of nonlinear dynamic behaviour of a shallow strip foundation with macro-element . Journal of Earthquake Engineering , 6 : 175 – 211 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouse, C. B. (2002). Commentary on soil-structure interaction in U.S. seismic provisions. In Proc. 7th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Decanini , L. , Liberatore , L. and Mollaioli , F. 2003 . Characterization of displacement demand for elastic and inelastic SDOF systems . Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 23 : 455 – 471 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Sarno , L. , Elnashai , A. S. and Nethercot , D. A. 2003 . Seismic performance assessment of stainless steel frames . Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 59 : 1289 – 1319 .
   Google Scholar
• Doo, K. K., & Yun, C. B. (2003). Time domain earthquake response analysis method for 2-D soil-structure interaction systems. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 15, 717–733.
   Google Scholar
• Elghadamsi , F. E. and Mohraz , B. 1987 . Inelastic earthquake spectra . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 15 : 91 – 104 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnashai , A. S. , Elghazouli , A. Y. and Denesh-Ashtiani , F. A. 1998 . Response of semirigid steel frames to cyclic and earthquake loads . Journal of Structural Engineering , 124 : 857 – 867 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnashai , A. S. and Mwafy , A. M. 2002 . Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings . The Structural Design of Tall Buildings , 11 : 329 – 351 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eser Aydemir, M. (2011). Soil structure interaction effects on structural behaviour parameters (PhD thesis). Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul [in Turkish].
   Google Scholar
• Eser Aydemir, M., & Aydemir, C. (2011). The effect of soil-structure interaction on inelastic displacement ratio of structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 39, 683–701. Technopress.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode-8. (1994). Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. European Committee for Standardization, ENV, 1998-1-1/2/3.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 273. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 355E. (2000). State of the art report on past performance of steel moment-frame buildings in earthquakes. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 450. (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ganjavi , B. and Hao , H. 2012a . A parametric study on the evaluation of ductility demand distribution in multi-degree-of-freedom systems considering soil–structure interaction effects . Engineering Structures , 43 : 88 – 104 .
   Google Scholar
• Ganjavi , B. and Hao , H. 2012b . Strength reduction factor for MDOF soil–structure systems . Structure Design Tall Specical Building , doi:10.1002/tal.1022
   Google Scholar
• Ghannad, M. A., & Ahmadnia, A. (2002). The effect of soil-structure interaction on the ductility demand of structures. In Proceedings of the 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, paper 588, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ghannad, M. A., & Jahankhah, H. (2004). Strength reduction factors considering soil-structure interaction. In Proceedings of the 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, paper 2331, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ghannad, M. A., & Ahmadnia, A. (2006). The effect of soil-structure interaction on inelastic structural demands. Journal of European Earthquake Engineering, 20-1, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ghannad , M.A. and Jahankhah , H. 2007 . Site-dependent strength reduction factors for soil-structure systems . Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 27 : 99 – 110 .
   Google Scholar
• Grange , S. , Kotronis , P. and Mazars , J. 2009a . A macro-element to simulate 3D soil-structure interaction considering plasticity and uplift . International Journal of Solids and Structures , 46 : 3651 – 3663 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange , S. , Kotronis , P. and Mazars , J. 2009b . A macro-element to simulate dynamic soil-structure interaction . Engineering Structures , 31 : 3034 – 3046 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange , S. , Botrugno , L. , Kotronis , P. and Tamagnini , C. 2011 . The effects of soil–structure Interaction on a reinforced concrete viaduct . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 40 : 93 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, V. K., & Trifunac, M. D. (1991). Seismic response of multistoried buildings including the effects of soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10, 414–422.
   Google Scholar
• Jarernprasert, S., Bazán-Zurita, E., & Bielak, J. (2001). Dynamic response of inelastic building foundation systems. The 2nd UJNR Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Jarernprasert, S. (2005). Inelastic design approach for asymmetric structure-foundation systems (PhD thesis), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Lai , S. P. and Biggs , J. M. 1980 . Inelastic response spectra for a seismic building design . Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE , 106 : 1295 – 1310 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee , L. H. , Han , S. W. and Oh , Y. H. 1999 . Determination of ductility factor considering different hysteretic models . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 28 : 957 – 977 .
   Google Scholar
• Lin , Y. Y. and Miranda , E. 2008 . Kinematic soil-structure interaction effects on maximum inelastic displacement demands of SDOF systems . Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering , 6 : 241 – 259 . doi: 10.1007/s10518-007-9049-y
   Google Scholar
• Mander , J. B. , Priestley , M. J. N. and Park , R. 1988 . Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete . ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering , 114 : 1804 – 1826 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. (2007). Turkish Seismic Design Code, Ankara (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, E. (1993). Site dependent strength reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119, 3503–3519.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, E. (2000). Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126, 1150–1159.
   Google Scholar
• Mwafy , A. M. , Kwonb , O. S. and Elnashai , A. S. 2010 . Seismic assessment of an existing non-seismically designed major bridge-abutment–foundation system . Engineering Structures , 32 : 2192 – 2209 .
   Google Scholar
• Nassar, A. A., & Krawinkler, H. (1991). Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. (Report No.95). Stanford, CA: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark, N. M., & Hall, W. J. (1973). Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities (Report No. 46). Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp. 209–236.
   Google Scholar
• Novak , M. 1974 . Effect of soil on structural response to wind and earthquake . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 3 : 79 – 96 .
   Google Scholar
• Penelis , G. G. and Kappos , A. J. 1997 . Earthquake Resistant Concrete Structures , London : E & FN Spon .
   Google Scholar
• Raychowdhury , P. 2011 . Seismic response of low-rise steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) buildings incorporating nonlinear soil–structure interaction SSI . Engineering Structures , 33 : 958 – 967 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell, R., & Newmark, N. M. (1979). Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes. Structural Research Series No. 468. Urbana: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell , R. , Hidalgo , P. and Cruz , E. 1989 . Response modification factors for earthquake resistant design of short period structures . Earthquake Spectra , 5 : 571 – 590 .
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez , M. E. and Montes , R. 2000 . Seismic response and damage analysis of buildings supported on flexible soils . Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics , 29 : 647 – 665 .
   Google Scholar
• Roy , R. and Dutta , S. 2010 . Inelastic seismic demand of low-rise buildings with soil-flexibility . International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics , 45 : 419 – 432 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Garcia , R. and Miranda , E. 2004 . Inelastic displacement ratios for design of structures on soft soils sites . Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE , 130 : 2051 – 2061 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Garcia , J. and Miranda , E. 2006 . Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of structures built on soft soils sites . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 35 : 679 – 694 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkani, S., Lutes, L. D., Jin, S., & Chan, C. (1999). Stochastic analysis of seismic structural response with soil-structure interaction. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 8, 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Structural Engineers Association of California . 2000 . Performance based seismic engineering of buildings vision 2000, committee , Sacramento , CA : SEAOC .
   Google Scholar
• Seismosoft. (2007). SeismoStruct – A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures (online). Retrieved from www.seismosoft.com
   Google Scholar
• Uniform Building Code. (1997). International conference of building officials. Whittier, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos , D. and Cornell , A. C. 2002 . Incremental dynamic analysis . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 31 : 491 – 514 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsos, A. S., & Newmark, N. M. (1960). Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions. Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2, 895–912, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsos, A. S., Newmark, N. M., & Chelapati, C. V. (1965). Deformation spectra for elastic and elastoplastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motions. Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 7, 663–682, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsos, A. S. (1977). Dynamic of structure-foundation systems. Structural and geotechnical mechanics. In W. J. Hall, (Ed.), A volume honoring N.M. Newmark (pp. 333–361). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentic-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., & Fischinger, M. (1992). A procedure for determining consistent inelastic design spectra. Proceeding of Workshop on nonlinear seismic analysis of RC structures, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf , J. P. 1994 . Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models , Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Wolf , J. P. 1997 . Spring – dashpot-mass models for foundation vibrations . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 26 : 931 – 949 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar