Non-linear seismic response analysis of the layered soil deposit using hybrid frequency–time domain (HFTD) approach

References

• Aki, K. (1988). Local site effects on strong ground motion (J. Lawrence Van Thun Ed. Vol. 20). Park City, UT: ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Asgari, A., & Bagheripour, M. H. (2010). Earthquake response analysis of soil layers using HFTD approach. Paper presented at the GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference, Shanghai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Assimaki, D., & Kausel, E. (2002). An equivalent linear algorithm with frequency and pressure dependent moduli and damping for seismic analysis of deep sites. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22, 959–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheripour, M. H., & Zhao, C. (1992). WDF 2-D finite-infinite dynamic element program. Sydney: University of NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Bardet, J. P., Ichii, K., & Lin, C. H. (2000). EERA: A computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analysis of layered soil deposits. Los Angeles, CA: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Bazrafshan moghaddam, A., & Bagheripour, M. H. (2011). Ground response analysis using non-recursive matrix implementation of hybrid frequency-time domain (HFTD) approach. Scientia Iranica, 18, 1188–1197.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, D., & Youssef, A. (1998). A hybrid time frequency domain formulation for non-linear soil–structure interaction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 27, 673–685.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. (1995). Dynamic of structures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chuhan, Z., & Zhao, C. (1987). Coupling methods of finite and infinite elements for strip foundation wave problems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 15, 839–851.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, R. W., & Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of structures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Darbre, G. R., & Wolf, J. P. (1988). Criterion of stability and implementation issues of hybrid frequency-time-domain procedure for non-linear dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 16, 569–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, R. W. (2002). Geotechnical earthquake engineering handbook. New york, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Diagourtas, D., Tzanis, A., & Makropoulos, K. (2001). Comparative study of microtremor analysis methods. Journal of Pure and Applied Geophysics, 158, 2463–2479.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H. P., & Liao, Z. P. (2001). A hybrid analysis method for linear dynamic soil-structure interaction in time and frequency domain. Journal of ACTA Seismologica Sinica, 14, 440–447.
   Google Scholar
• Elgamal, A. W., Yang, Z., Parra, E., & Ragheb, A. (1998). CYCLIC 1D: An internet-based finite element computer program for one dimensional site amplification analysis using an incremental plasticity coupled soil-fluid (u-p) formulation: University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• EPRI. (1993). Guidelines fordetermining design basis ground motions (Vol. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Faccioli, E. (1991). Seismic amplification in the presence of geological and topographic irregularities. Paper presented at the International conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, B., & Drnevich, V. (1972). Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equation sand curves. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 98, 667–692.
   Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M. A., Groholski, D. R., Philips, C. A., Park, D., & Musgrove, M. (2011). DEEPSOIL 4.0, user manual and tutorial. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M. A., & Park, D. (2001). Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the mississipi embayment. Journal of Engineering Geology, 62, 611–624.
   Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M. A., & Park, D. (2002). Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22, 611–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisey, J. S. (1982). Determination of in-situ shear waves velocity from spectral- analysis-of-surface-waves. (Msc.), Universityof Texas, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss, I. M., & Sun, J. I. (1992). SHAKE 91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits. Davis, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss, I., & Sun, J. (2001). User’s manual for Proshake: US National Institute of Standard and Technology. Davis, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Iwan, W. D. (1967). On a class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems. Journal of of Applied Mechanics, 34, 612–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, J. D. (1983). Solution of nonlinear dynamic structural systems by a hybrid frequency–time domain approach. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institue of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., & Finn, W. L. L. (1978). DESRA 2C-dynamic effective stress response analysis of soil deposits with energy transmitting boundary including assessment of liquefaction potential. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Department of Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, D. C. F., Lai, C. G., & Puci, I. (2006). ONDA: Computer code for nonlinear seismic response analysis of soil deposits. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132, 223–236.
   Google Scholar
• Mansur, W. J., Carrer, J. A., Ferreira, W. G., Claret de Gouveia, A. M., & Venancio-Filho, F. (2000). Time-segmented frequency-domain analysis for non-linear multi-degree of freedom structural systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 237, 457–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. P., & Seed, H. B. (1978). MASH: A computer program for the non-linear analysis of vertically propagating shear waves in horizontally layered deposits. Berkley: University of California, Earthqauke engineering research center.
   Google Scholar
• Masing, G. (1926). Eigenspannungen and verfertigungbeim messing. Paper presented at the 2nd International Congresson of Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Matasovic, N. (1993). Seismic response of composite horizontally–layered soil deposits. (PhD), University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ohsaki, Y. (1982). Dynamic non linear model and one-dimensional non linear response of soil deposits: Department of Architecture, Facultly of engineering, University of Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, M. (1997). Structural dynamics - theory and computation (4th ed.). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, C., & Hashash, Y. M. A. (2009). Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 1143–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Prevost, J. (1977). Mathematical modeling of monotonic and cyclic undrained clay behavior. International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1, 195–216.
   Google Scholar
• Prevost, J. (1989). DYNA1D - A computer program for nonlinear seismic site responseanalysis: Technical documentation. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pyke, R. (1979). Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 105, 715–726.
   Google Scholar
• Ramberg, W., & Osgood, W. (1943). Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
   Google Scholar
• Roesset, J. M., & Whitman, R. V. (1973). Modal analysis for structures with foundation interaction. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 99, 399–416.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., & Seed, H. B. (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered soil sites. University of California, Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1970). Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic responseanalyses. University of California, Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H., Wong, R., Idriss, I., & Tokimatsu, K. (1984). Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Streeter, V. L., Wylie, E. B., Benjamin, E., & Richart, F. E., Jr (1974). CHARSOIL: Soil motion computations by characteristics method. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 100, 247–263.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Golesorkhi, R., & Seed, H. (1988). Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Von Estorff, O., & Firuziaan, F. (2000). Coupled BEM/FEM approach for nonlinear soil/structure interaction. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 24, 715–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. H. (1964). Effect of site conditions on earthquake intensity. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 90, 279–313.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. (1968). A computer program for the dynamic stress analysis of underground structures: Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. P. (1986). Nonlinear soil-structure-interaction analysis based on hybrid frequency-time domain formulation. Paper presented at the 8th European conference of earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. (2004). Geotechnical modelling. Abingdon: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, N., Kobayashi, S., Suetomi, I., & Miura, K. (2002). Equivalent linear method considering frequencydependant characteristics of stiffness and damping. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22, 205–222.
   Google Scholar