Three-dimensional finite element formulation for nonlinear dynamic analysis of seismic site and structure response

References

• Bathe, K. J. (1996). Finite elements procedures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bažant, Z. P., & Oh, B. H. (1983). Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. RIELM, 93, 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Bažant, Z. P., & Oh, B. H. (1986). Numerical Integration on the surface of a sphere. Mathematics and Mechanics, 66, 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bažant, Z. P., & Prat, B. C. (1988). Microplane model for brittle–plastic material – Parts I and II. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 114, 1672–1702.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:10(1672)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čaušević, M., & Mitrović, S. (2011). Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 467–489.10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisfield, M. A. (1991). Non-linear finite element analysis of solid and structures. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., & Lewy, H. (1928). Uber die partiellen Differenzeingleichungen der matematischen Physik [On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics]. Mathematische Annalen, 100, 32–74.10.1007/BF01448839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza Neto, E. A., Perić, D., & Owen, D. R. J. (2008). Introduction in computational methods for plasticity: Theory and applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley doi:10.1002/978047069462610.1002/9780470694626
   Google Scholar
• Héloïse, C., Bard, P. Y., & Rodriguez-Marek, A. (2012). Site effect assessment using KiK-net data: Part 1. A simple correction procedure for surface/downhole spectral ratios. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 421–448. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9283-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoek, E., & Diederichs, M. S. (2006). Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2005, 203–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahromi, H. Z. Z. (2009). Partitioned analysis of nonlinear soil–structure interaction (Dissertation). Imperial College London.
   Google Scholar
• Jeremić, B., Jie, G., Preisig, M., & Tafazzoli, N. (2009). Time domain simulation of soil–foundation–structure interaction in non-uniform soils. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35, 137–157.
   Google Scholar
• Kiban-Kyoshin Database. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.kik.bosai.go.jp/
   Google Scholar
• Kontoe, S., Zdravkovic, L., & Potts, D. M. (2008). An assessment of time integration schemes for dynamic geotechnical problems. Computers and Geotechnics, 35, 253–264.10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Washington, DC: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, L. (2005). An effective finite element approach for soil-structure analysis in the time-domain. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 21, 437–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Caballero, F., Modaressi-Farahmad, R., & Modaressi, H. (2007). Nonlinear numerical method for earthquake site response analysis I – Elastoplastic cyclic model and parameter identification strategy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5, 303–323.10.1007/s10518-007-9032-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., Lu, X., Guan, H., & Ye, L. (2013). Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete high-rise building induced by extreme earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42, 705–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalva, G. A. (2010). Site-specific seismic hazard analyses (Dissertation). Washington State University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ožbolt, J., & Bažant, Z. P. (1996). Numerical smeared fracture analysis: Nonlocal microcrack interaction approach. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 39, 635–661.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ožbolt, J., Li, Y., & Kožar, I. (2001). Microplane model for concrete with relaxed kinematic constraint. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 38, 2683–2711.10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00177-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ožbolt, J., Rah, K. K., & Meštrović, D. (2006). Influence of loading rate on concrete cone failure. International Journal of Fracture, 139, 239–252.10.1007/s10704-006-0041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ožbolt, J., Sharma, A., & Reinhardt, H. W. (2011). Dynamic fracture of concrete – compact tension. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 16, 2683–2711.
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotidou, A. I., Gazetas, G., & Gerolymos, N. (2012). Pushover and seismic response of foundations on stiff clay: Analysis with P-delta effects. Earthquake Spectra, 28, 1589–1618.10.1193/1.4000084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peregalani, F., de Franco, R., Compagnoli, M., & Caielli, G. (2006). Evaluation of site effects using numerical and experimental analyses in Città di Castello (Italy). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26, 941–951.10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PGI Visual Fortran User’s Guide, Portland Group. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.pgroup.com/
   Google Scholar
• Rocscience Inc. (2002). RocLab Version 1.0 – Rock mass strength analysis using the generalized Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Toronto. Retrieved from www.rocscience.com
   Google Scholar
• Sandia National Labs. (2012). KitwareInc, and Los Alamos National Labs. Paraview: Parallel visualization application. Retrieved from http://paraview.org
   Google Scholar
• Sextos, A. G. (2012). A multi-platform simulation alternative for the performance-based design of interactive soil-bridge systems. Protection of Built Environment Against Earthquakes, 2012, 289–306. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1448-9_14
   Google Scholar
• Singupalli, S. K. (2008). Evaluation of non-linear site effects using Kik-Net Japanese database (Dissertation). University of Joseph Fourier, Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, S. W., Abbo, A. J., & Sheng, D. (2001). Refined explicit integration of elastoplastic models with automatic error control. Engineering Computations, 18, 121–154. University Press.10.1108/02644400110365842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smerzini, C., Paolucci, R., & Stupazzini, M. (2011). Comparison of 3D, 2D and 1D numerical approaches to predict long period earthquake ground motion in the Gubbio plain, Central Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 2007–2029.10.1007/s10518-011-9289-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiliopoulos, K. V., & Lykidis, G. Ch. (2005). An efficient three-dimensional solid finite element dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35, 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travaš, V., Ožbolt, J., & Kožar, I. (2009). Failure of plain concrete beam at impact load: 3D finite element analysis. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 160, 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Sheng, D., Rouainia, M., & Sloan, S. W. (2005). Explicit stress integration of complex soil models. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 29, 1209–1229.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar