Uncertainties in seismic response of a torsional irregular structure

References

• Aubry, D., Chouvet, D., Modaressi, A., & Modaressi, H. (1986). GEFDyn, [computer program]: Mechanical behavior analysis software of soil by finite element with consideration the soil-water-air coupling, scientific manual. Ecole Centrale Paris. Paris: LMSS-Mat.
   Google Scholar
• Aubry, D., & Modaressi, A. (1996). GEFDyn, [computer program]: Manuel scientifique. Ecole Centrale Paris. Paris: LMSS-Mat.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A. (1970). A mesure of earthquake intensity. In R. J. Hansen (Ed.), Seismic design for nuclear power plants (pp. 438–483). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akkar, S., Sucuoğlu, H., & Yakut, A. (2005). Displacement-based fragility functions for low- and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 21, 901–927.10.1193/1.2084232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAEL 91, modified 99. (2000). Règles techniques de conception et de calcul des ouvrages et constructions en béton armé suivant la méthode des états limites. Paris: Ed. Eyrolles.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, D., & Jain, S. K. (2004). Seismic analysis of asymmetric buildings with flexible floor diaphragms. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 1169–1176.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1169)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B., Dhakal, R., MacRae, G., & Cubrinovski, M. (2010). Prediction of spatially distributed seismic demands in specific structures: Ground motion and structural response. Earthquake Engineering and Structural dynamics, 39, 501–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensalah, M. D., Bensaibi, M., & Modaressi, A. (2013). Assessment of the torsion effect in asymmetric buildings under seismic loading. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 256–259, 2222–2228.
   Google Scholar
• Bensaibi, M., Bensalah, M. D., & Modaressi, A. (2012). Uncertainties in the estimation of the torsion effect in buildings subjected to seismic loading. Fifth Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications, Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, (5APSSRA), Singapore (pp. 157–163). doi:10.3850/978-981-07-2219-7P270
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., Farsi, M. N., Mebarki, A., & Belazougui, M. (2013). Development of an integrated approach for Algerian building seismic damage assessment. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 47, 471–493. doi:10.12989/sem.2013.47.4.47110.12989/sem.2013.47.4.471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., Farsi, M. N., Mebarki, A., Belazougui, M., Amellal, O., Mezazigh, B., … Benhamouche, A. (2014). Seismic risk and damage prediction: Case of the buildings in Constantine city (Algeria). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12, 2683–2704. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9594-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. (2004). Eurocode 8– designs of structures for earthquake resistance. European standard EN 1998–1, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (1991). Evaluation of torsional provisions in seismic codes. Journal of Structural Engineering, 117, 3762–3782.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3762)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. M., & Hutchinson, G. L. (1992). Effect of structural period and ground motion parameters on the earthquake response of asymmetric buildings. Engineering Structures, 14, 354–360.10.1016/0141-0296(92)90018-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, X. N., & Chandler, A. M. (1993). Inelastic seismic response of code-designed multistorey frame buildings with regular asymmetry. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 431–445.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P., Kilar, V., Marusic, D., & Perus, I. (2005). Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 831–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, F. (2002). Structural analysis in earthquake engineering – a breakthrough of simplified nonlinear methods. 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK. Paper 843.
   Google Scholar
• Fellin, W., King, J., Kirsch, A., & Oberguggenberger, M. (2010). Uncertainty modelling and sensitivity analysis of tunnel face stability. Structural Safety, 32, 402–410.10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, R. K., & Chopra, A. K. (1991). Inelastic seismic response of one-storey, asymmetric-plan systems: Effects of system parameters and yielding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 20, 201–222.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, R. K., & Chopra, A. K. (1993). Seismic code analysis of buildings without locating centers of rigidity. Journal of Structural Engineering, 119, 3039–3055.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:10(3039)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helton, J. C., Johnson, J. D., Sallaberry, C. J., & Storlie, C. B. (2006). Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 1175–1209.10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., & Cornell, C. A. (2005). Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra, 21, 685–713.10.1193/1.1990199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarernprasert, S., Bazan, E., & Bielak, J. (2008). Inelastic torsional single-story systems. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Kyrkos, M. T., & Anagnostopoulos, S. A. (2013). Eccentric steel buildings designed for uniform ductility demands under earthquake actions. 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN2013, Kos Island, Greece. Paper 1148.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Caballero, F., & Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, A. (2010). Assessment of variability and uncertainties effects on the seismic response of a liquefiable soil profile. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30, 600–613.10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmark, N. M., & Rosenblueth, E. (1971). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Peruš, I., & Fajfar, P. (2002). On inelastic seismic response of asymmetric single-storey structures under bi-axial excitation. Proceedings of the third European workshop on the seismic behaviour of irregular and complex structures (pp. 16–17). Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Peruš, I., & Fajfar, P. (2005). On the inelastic torsional response of single-storey structures under bi-axial excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34, 931–941.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz, M. (1994). International hand book of earthquake engineering: codes, programs, and examples. New york: Chapman & Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• PEER Strong Motion Database. (XXXX). Retrieved from http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html
   Google Scholar
• Penna, A., Cattari, S., Galasco, A., & Lagomarsino, S. (2004). Seismic assessment of masonry structures by non-linear macro-element analysis. In IV International Seminar on Structural Analysis of Historical Construction-Possibilities of Numerical and Experimental Techniques (Vol. 2, pp. 1157–1164). Padova: A.A. Balkema Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rutenberg, A., Eisenberger, M., & Shohet, G. (1992). Inelastic seismic response of code-designed single storey asymmetric structures. Engineering Structures, 14, 91–102.10.1016/0141-0296(92)90035-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RPA 99 version. 2003. (2004). Algerian Seismic code. DTR-B.C.2.48. Ministry of Housing and Urban Planning, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Rathje, E. M., Abrahamson, N. A., & Bray, J. D. (1998). Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124, 150–159.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos, K. G., & Anagnostopoulos, S. A. (2005). Inelastic torsion of multistorey buildings under earthquake excitations. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34, 1449–1465.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakib, H. (2004). Evaluation of dynamic eccentricity by considering soil-structure interaction: A proposal for seismic design codes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24, 369–378.10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., & Naganuma, T. (2000). Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126, 1224–1231.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M. (1998, April 26–28). Statistical analysis of bridge fragility curves. In Proceedings of the US-Italy workshop on protective systems for bridges.
   Google Scholar
• Tso, W. K., & Ying, H. (1990). Additional seismic inelastic deformation caused by structural asymmetry. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19, 243–258.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tso, W. K., & Ying, H. (1992). Lateral strength distribution specification to limit additional inelastic deformation of torsionally unbalanced structures. Engineering Structures, 14, 263–277.10.1016/0141-0296(92)90014-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar