Non-linear finite element analyses applicable for the design of large reinforced concrete structures

References

• Bark, H., Markou, G., Mourlas, C., & Papadrakakis, M. (2016, June 5--10). Seismic assessment of a 5-storey retrofitted RC building. ECCOMAS Congress 2016, VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Crete Island, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. (1976). Optimal stress locations in finite element models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 10, 243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. (1989). More on optimal stress points -- Reduced integration, element distortions and error estimations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 28, 1487–1504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathe, K.-J., Walczak, J., Welch, A., & Mistry, N. (1989). Nonlinear analysis of concrete structures. Computers & Structures, 32, 563–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazant, Z. P., & Oh, B. H. (1983). Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Materials and Structures, 16, 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Bédard, C., & Kotsovos, M. D. (1985). Application of NLFEA to concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111, 2691–2707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, B., Damoni, C., den Uijl, J. A., Hendriks, M. A. N., & Walraven, J. (2013). Shear resistance evaluation of prestressed concrete bridge beams: Fib model code 2010 guidelines for level IV approximations. Structural Concrete, 14, 242–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, B., Damoni, C., & Hendriks, M. A. N. (2011). Development of guidelines for nonlinear finite element analyses of existing reinforced and pre-stressed beams. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 15, 1361–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, B., Damoni, C., Hendriks, M. A. N., & de Boer, A. (2014). Analytical and numerical evaluation of the design shear resistance of reinforced concrete slabs. Structural Concrete, 15, 317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, B., Pimentel, M., Scolari, M., & Walraven, J. C. (2015). Safety assessment of punching shear failure according to the level of approximation approach. Structural Concrete, 16, 366–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan, P. G., & Holand, I. (1979). Nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 17, 443–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, D. E., Åldstedt, E., & Grosch, H. (1994). Design of offshore concrete structures based on postprocessing of results from finite element analysis (FEA): Methods, limitations and accuracy. In Proceedings of the Fourth (1994) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Bresler, B., & Scordelis, A. C. (1963). Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 60, 51–74.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. (2006). EN ISO 19903: Petroleum and natural gas industries. Fixed concrete offshore structures. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Cervenka, V., & Gerstle, K. H. (1972). Inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete panels: Experimental verification and application. IABSE Publications, 32, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Cotsovos, D. M. (2004). Numerical modelling of structural concrete under dynamic (earthquake and impact) loading (PhD thesis). London: Imperial College London.
   Google Scholar
• Cotsovos, D. M., & Pavlovic, M. N. (2006). Simplified FE model for RC structures under earthquakes. Proceedings of the ICE -- Structures and Buildings, 159, 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Borst, R., & Nauta, P. (1985). Non-orthogonal cracks in a smeared finite element model. Engineering Computations, 2, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Engen, M., Hendriks, M. A. N., Köhler, J., Øverli, J. A., & Åldstedt, E. (2017). A quantification of the modelling uncertainty of non-linear finite element analyses of large concrete structures. Structural Safety, 64, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen, M., Hendriks, M. A. N., Øverli, J. A., & Åldstedt, E. (2015). Solution strategy for non-linear finite element analyses of large reinforced concrete structures. Structural Concrete, 16, 389–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, G. C., Smith, G. M., Riveland, A. R., & Pierce, D. N. (1973). Basic reinforced concrete frame performance under vertical and lateral loads. ACI Journal, 70, 261–269.
   Google Scholar
• fib. (2008). Bulletin 45: Practitioner’s guide to finite element modelling of reinforced concrete structures. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• fib. (2009). Bulletin 50: Concrete structures for oil & gas fields. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• fib. (2013). fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
   Google Scholar
• González Vidosa, F. (1989). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of structural concrete under static loading (PhD thesis). London: University of London.
   Google Scholar
• González Vidosa, F., Kotsovos, M. D., & Pavlovic, M. N. (1988). On the numerical instability of the Smeared-Crack approach in the non-linear modelling of concrete structures. Communications in Applied Numerical Methods, 4, 799–806.
   Google Scholar
• González Vidosa, F., Kotsovos, M. D., & Pavlovic, M. N. (1991a). Three-dimensional non-linear finite-element model for structural concrete. Part 1: Main features and objectivity study. Proceedings of the ICE -- Structures and Buildings, 91, 517–544.
   Google Scholar
• González Vidosa, F., Kotsovos, M. D., & Pavlovic, M. N. (1991b). Three-dimensional non-linear finite-element model for structural concrete. Part 2: Generality study. Proceedings of the ICE -- Structures and Buildings, 91, 545–560.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, M. A. N., de Boer, A., & Belletti, B. (2017). Guidelines for nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete structures. Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Infrastructure (Report No. RTD:1016–1:2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jelic, I., Pavlovic, M. N., & Kotsovos, M. D. (2004). Performance of structural-concrete members under sequential loading and exhibiting points of inflection. Computers and Concrete, 1, 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D. (1979a). A mathematical description of the strength properties of concrete under generalized stress. Magazine of Concrete Research, 31, 151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D. (1979b). Fracture processes of concrete under generalised stress states. Materials and Structures, 12, 431–437.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D. (1980). A mathematical model of the deformational behavior of concrete under generalised stress based on fundamental material properties. Materials and Structures, 13, 289–298.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D. (1982). A fundamental explanation of the behaviour of reinforced concrete beams in flexure based on the properties of concrete under multiaxial stress. Materials and Structures, 15, 529–537.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D. (1984). Concrete. A brittle fracturing material. Materials and Structures, 17, 107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D., & Pavlovic, M. N. (1995). Structural concrete: Finite-element analysis for limit-state design. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D., Pavlovic, M. N., & Cotsovos, D. M. (2008). Characteristic features of concrete behaviour: Implications for the development of an engineering finite-element tool. Computers and Concrete, 5, 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsovos, M. D., & Spiliopoulos, K. V. (1998). Modelling of crack closure for finite-element analysis of structural concrete. Computers & Structures, 69, 383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefas, I. D., Kotsovos, M. D., & Ambraseys, N. N. (1990). Behaviour of reinforced concrete structural walls: Strength, deformation characteristics, and failure mechanism. ACI Structural Journal, 87, 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykidis, G. C., & Spiliopoulos, K. V. (2008). 3D solid finite-element analysis of cyclically loaded RC structures allowing embedded reinforcement slippage. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 629–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markou, G., & Papadrakakis, M. (2013). Computationally efficient 3D finite element modeling of RC structures. Computers and Concrete, 12, 443–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markou, G., Sabouni, R., Suleiman, F., & El-Chouli, R. (2015). Full-scale modeling of the soil-structure interaction problem through the use of hybrid models (HYMOD). International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 5, 885–899.
   Google Scholar
• Mourlas, C., Papadrakakis, M., & Markou, G. (2016, June 5--10). Accurate and efficient modeling for the cyclic behavior of rc structural members. ECCOMAS Congress 2016, VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Crete Island, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Norges Standardiseringsforbund. (2003). NS 3473.E: Design of concrete structures. Design and detailing rules. 6th ed. Oslo: Norges Standardiseringsforbund.
   Google Scholar
• Øverli, J. A. (2016). A density-dependent failure criterion for concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 566–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, M., Brühwiler, E., & Figueiras, J. A. (2014). Safety examination of existing concrete structures using the global resistance safety factor concept. Engineering Structures, 70, 130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roache, P. J. (1998). Verification of codes and calculations. AIAA Journal, 36, 696–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, J. G. (1988). Computational modeling of concrete fracture (PhD thesis). Delft, the Netherlands: Technische Universiteit Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, J. G., & Blaauwendraad, J. (1989). Crack models for concrete: Discrete or smeared? Fixed, multidirectional or rotating? Heron, 34, 1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Schlune, H., Plos, M., & Gylltoft, K. (2012). Safety formats for non-linear analysis of concrete structures. Magazine of Concrete Research, 64, 563–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simo, J. C., Armero, F., & Taylor, R. L. (1993). Improved versions of assumed enhanced strain tri-linear elements for 3D finite deformation problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 110, 359–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simo, J. C., & Rifai, M. S. (1990). A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 29, 1595–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiliopoulos, K. V., & Lykidis, G. Ch. (2006). An efficient three-dimensional solid finite element dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, F. J. (2001). Non-linear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete: At the crossroads? Structural Concrete, 2, 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchio, F. J., & Balopoulou, S. (1990). On the nonlinear behaviour of reinforced concrete frames. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 17, 698–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, F. J., & Emara, M. B. (1992). Shear Deformations in reinforced concrete frames. ACI Structural Journal, 89, 46–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willam, K. J., & Warnke, E. P. (1974). Constitutive model for the triaxial behaviour of concrete. IABSE Reports of the Working Commissions, 19, 1–30.
   Google Scholar