Seismic response evaluation of structures on improved liquefiable soil

References

• Baez, J. I., & Martin, G. R. (1993). Advances in the design of vibro systems for the improvement of liquefaction resistance. In Proceedings of 7th Annual Symposium on Ground Improvement, Canadian Geotechnical Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., Sivakumar, V., & Bell, A. (2011). The settlement performance of stone column foundations. Geotechnique, 61(11), 909–922. doi:10.1680/geot.9.P.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckovalas, G. D., Papadimitriou, A. G., Kondis, A., & Bakas, G. J. (2006). Equivalent-uniform soil model for the seismic response analysis of sites improved with inclusions. In Proceedings of 6th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering (pp. 801–807), Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Broms, B. G. (1982). Lime columns in theory and practice. In Proceedings of International Conference on Soil Mechanics (pp. 149–165). Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, V., Welsh, J., Wareen, J., Lukas, R., Collin, J., & Berg, R. (2006). Ground improvement methods: Reference Manual – Volume I. NHI Course No. 13204, FHA.
   Google Scholar
• Fatahi, B., Nguyen, Q., Xu, R., & Sun, W. (2018). Three-dimensional response of neighboring buildings sitting on pile foundations to seismic pounding. International Journal of Geomechanics, 18(4), 04018007. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gniel, J., & Bouazza, A. (2009). Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Geotextiles Geomembranes, 27(3), 167–175. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R. (2008). Earthquake-induced pounding between equal height buildings with substantially different dynamic properties. Engineering Structures, 30(10), 2818–2829. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, K., & Kirsch, F. (2010). Ground improvement by deep vibratory methods. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, S., & Jankowski, R. (2010). Pounding-involved response of isolated and non-isolated buildings under earthquake excitation. Earthquakes and Structures, 1(3), 3250–3262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miwa, S., & Ikeda, T. (2006). Shear modulus and strain of liquefied ground and their application to evaluation of the response of foundation structures. Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, 23, 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council NRC. (1985). Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, D., & Hashash, Y. M. (2004). Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2), 249–274. doi:10.1080/13632460409350489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richart, F. E., & Whitman, R. V. (1967). Comparison of footing vibration tests with theory. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 93(SM6), 143–168.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J. L., & Seed, H. B. (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1970). Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis, Report EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkely.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., & Booker, J. R. (1977). Stabilization of potentially liquefiable sand deposits using gravel drains. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 103(GT7), 757–768.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1982). Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph.
   Google Scholar
• Shenthan, T., Nashed, R., Thevanayagam, S., & Martin, G. R. (2004). Liquefaction mitigation in silty soils using composite stone columns and dynamic compaction. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 3(1), 39–50. doi:10.1007/BF02668849
   Google Scholar
• Sitar, N. (Ed.). (1995). Geotechnical reconnaissance of the effects of the January 17, 1995, Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake Japan. Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Rep. No. UCB/EERC-95/01.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, T. (1996). Identification analysis for dynamic soil properties using strong motion records at Kobe Port Island. In Proceedings of the 31st Japan National Conference on Geotechnical Engineering (pp. 1089–1090).
   Google Scholar
• Takewaki, I. (2005). Bound of earthquake input energy to soil-structure interaction systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25(7-10), 741–752. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viggiani, G., & Atkinson, J. H. (1995). Stiffness of fine grained soil at very small strains. Géotechnique, 45(2), 249–265. doi:10.1680/geot.1995.45.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, I., & Kurita, T. (1995). Back analysis of soil properties of Port Island with the observation data. Tsuchi-to-Kiso, 43(9), 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh, A., & Choobbasti, A. J. (2010). Investigation of bearing capacity and settlement of strip footing on clay reinforced with stone columns. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(8), 3658–3668.
   Google Scholar