Coupling hardening soil model and Ménard pressuremeter tests to predict pile behavior

References

• Abchir, Z., Burlon, S., Frank, R., Habert, J., & Legrand, S. (2016). t–z curves for piles from pressuremeter test results. Géotechnique, 66(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelim, R. R., Cunha, R. P., & Sales, M. M. (2016). Determining the elastic deformation modulus from a compacted earth embankment via laboratory and ménard pressuremeter tests. Soils and Rocks, 39(3), 285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud, J. P., Gambin, M., & Schlosser, F. (2013). Courbes hyperboliques contrainte–déformation au pressiomètre Ménard autoforé. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Presses des Ponts et Chaussees, pp. 491–494.
   Google Scholar
• Benoît, J., & Howie, J. A. (2014). A view of pressuremeter testing in North America. Soils and Rocks, 37(3), 211–231.
   Google Scholar
• Briaud, J. L. (1992). The pressuremeter. A.A. Balkema Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Briaud, J. L. (2013). Ménard Lecture - The pressuremeter test: Expanding its use. 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. ISSMGE, pp. 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkgreve, R. B. J., Engin, E., & Swolfs, W. M. (2014). Plaxis 2D anniversary edition - material models manual. Plaxis bv.
   Google Scholar
• Burlon, S., Frank, R., Baguelin, F., Habert, J., & Legrand, S. (2014). Model factor for the bearing capacity of piles from pressuremeter test results – Eurocode 7 approach. Géotechnique, 64(7), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.13.P.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J. P., Booker, J. R., & Yeung, S. K. (1986). Cavity expansion in cohesive frictional soils. Géotechnique, 36(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayne, P. W., & Martin, G. K. (1998). Commentary on Marchetti flat dilatometer correlations in soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 21(3), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10896J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. F., & Ng, C. W. W. (2014). Relationships between chemical weathering indices and physical and mechanical properties of decomposed granite. Engineering Geology, 179, 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz Jr., A. J d. (2016). Instrumentação de fundações estaqueadas. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Goiás (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, R. P. (1996). A new cavity expansion model to simulate selfboring pressuremeter tests in sand. Soils and Rocks, 19(1), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, R. P., Veverka, J., & Santos, R. G. M. (2012). Simulation of laterally loaded foundation groups via Menárd pressuremeter tests. 4th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization – ISC4, Porto de Galinhas, pp. 977–984.
   Google Scholar
• Décourt, L. (1989). The standard penetration test, state of the art report. 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. A.A. Balkema, pp. 2405–2416.
   Google Scholar
• DeJong, J. T., White, D. J., & Randolph, M. F. (2006). Microscale observation and modeling of soil-structure interface behavior using particle image velocimetry. Soils and Foundations, 46(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. M., & Chang, C. Y. (1970). Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 96(5), 1629–1653.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, M., & Carter, J. P. (1993). A finite element study of the pressuremeter test in sand using a nonlinear elastic plastic model. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 30(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah, M. Y., Abbas, S. F., & Karim, H. H. (2012). A model for coupled dynamic elastic-plastic analysis of soils. Journal of GeoEngineering, 7(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2012.7(3).2
   Google Scholar
• Fattah, M. Y., Salman, F. A., Al-Shakarchi, Y. J., & Raheem, A. M. (2013). Coupled pile-soil interaction analysis in undrained condition. Journal of Central South University, 20(5), 1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1625-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawaz, A., Boulon, M., & Flavigny, E. (2002). Parameters deduced from the pressuremeter test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(6), 1333–1340. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawaz, A., Hagechehade, F., & Farah, E. (2014). A study of the pressuremeter modulus and its comparison to the elastic modulus of soil. Study of Civil Engineering and Architecture (SCEA), 3, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, E., Cunha, R. P., & Carvalho, D. (2005). A simplified analytical manner to obtain soil parameters from Menard pressuremeter tests on unsaturated soils. In M. P. Gambin, J. P. Magnan, and P. Mestat (Eds.), 50 years of pressuremeters international symposium - ISP5 (pp. 289–295). Presses des Ponts et Chaussees.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R., & Zhao, S. R. (1982). Estimation par les paramètres pressiométriques de l’enfocement sous charge axiale de pieux forés dans des sols fins. Bull. Liaison Lab. Ponts Chaussées, 119, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gambin, M., Flavigny, E., & Boulon, M. (1996). Le module pressiométrique: Historique et modélisation. XI Colloque Franco-Polonais en Mécanique des Sols et des Roches Appliquée. p. 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gaone, F. M., Doherty, J. P., & Gourvenec, S. (2019). An optimization strategy for evaluating modified Cam clay parameters using self-boring pressuremeter test data. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 56(11), 1668–1679. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, K. G., Cadogan, D., & Casey, P. (2009). Shaft capacity of continuous flight auger piles in sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(6), 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, K. H., Jeyatharan, K., & Wen, D. (2012). Understanding the stiffness of soils in Singapore from pressuremeter testing. Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA, 43(4), 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, B. O., & Drnevich, V. P. (1972). Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 98(SM7), 667–692.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. M. O., Wroth, C. P., & Windle, D. (1977). Pressuremeter tests in sands. Géotechnique, 27(4), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1977.27.4.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondner, R. L. (1963). Hyperbolic stress-strain response: Cohesive soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 89(1), 115–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, L. M., Ray, R. P., & Kagawa, T. (1981). Theoretical t–z curves. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 107(11), 1543–1561.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, C., & Jefferis, S. A. (2011). Critical assessment of pile modulus determination methods. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(10), 1433–1448. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Xiao, H. B., Tang, J., & Li, Q. S. (2004). Analysis of load-transfer of single pile in layered soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 31(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, R. R. (2020). Ensaios pressiométricos para estimativa de parâmetros de resistência e deformabilidade em um perfil de solo tropical. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Goiás (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P. W., & Kulhawy, F. H. (1982). Ko-OCR relationships in soil. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 108(6), 851–872.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P.W., and Martin, G.K. (1998). Commentary on Marchetti Flat Dilatometer Correlations in Soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 21(3), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10896J
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P. W., & Kulhawy, F. H. (2002). Discussion on: Relationship between Ko and overconsolidation ratio: A theoretical approach. Géotechnique, 53(4), 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.4.450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NF P94-262. (2012). Norme francaise, Justification des ouvrages geotechnicques, norme d’application nationale de l’Eurocode 7. Foundations profondes. doi:ISSN 0335–3931.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, P., Song, L., Mei, G., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Generalized nonlinear softening load-transfer model for axially loaded piles. International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(8), 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulos, H. G. (2009). Tall buildings and deep foundations – Middle East challenges. In M. Hamza (Ed.), Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering (pp. 3173–3205). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-3173
   Google Scholar
• Rebolledo, J. F. R., León, R. F. P., & Camapum, J. (2019). Obtaining the mechanical parameters for the hardening soil model of tropical soils in the city of Brasília. Soils and Rocks, 42(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.421061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiffsteck, P. (2009). ISP5 pile prediction revisited. In International foundation congress and equipment - Expo 2009 (pp. 19–26). ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41022(336)7
   Google Scholar
• Sales, M. M., & Curado, T. S. (2018). Interaction factor between piles: Limits on using the conventional elastic approach in pile group analysis. Soils and Rocks, 41(1), 049–060. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.411049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales, M. M., Small, J. C., & Poulos, H. G. (2010). Compensated piled rafts in clayey soils: Behaviour, measurements and predictions. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 47(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanz, T., Vermeer, P. A., & Bonnier, P. G. (1999). The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification. Beyond 2000 in computational geotechnics – 10 years of PLAXIS, p. 116.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B. (1966). Discussion on: Earth pressure at rest related to stress history. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 3(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1139/t66-028
   Google Scholar
• Surarak, C., Likitlersuang, S., Wanatowski, D., Balasubramaniam, A., Oh, E., & Guan, H. (2012). Stiffness and strength parameters for hardening soil model of soft and stiff Bangkok clays. Soils and Foundations, 52(4), 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbaitis, D., Lekstutyte, I., & Gribulis, D. (2016). Overconsolidation ratio determination of cohesive soil. Proceedings of 13th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conference. Lithuanian Geotechnical Society, Lithuania, pp. 108–113. https://doi.org/10.3846/13bsgc.2016.014
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veen, C. (1953). Bearing capacity of a pile. In International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Zurich, p. v.2.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. M. (1990). Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. X., Jardine, R. J., Zhu, B. T., Foray, P., & Tsuha, C. H. C. (2010). Sand grain crushing and interface shearing during displacement pile installation in sand. Géotechnique, 60(6), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2010.60.6.469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar