Alkali-activated mortars: porosity and capillary absorption

References

• Adam, A. A. (2009). Strength and durability properties of alkali-activated slag and fly ash-based geopolymer concrete [Ph.D. thesis]. School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Albitar, M., Ali, M. M., Visintin, P., & Drechsler, M. (2017). Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes. Construction and Building Materials, 136, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aligizaki, K. (2005). Pore structure of cement-based materials: Testing, interpretation and requirements (1st ed., p. 432). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Otaib, S. (2008). Durability of concrete incorporating GGBS activated by water-glass. Construction and Building Materials, 22(10), 2059–2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.023.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, R. M. (2018). Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data, 10(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bildirici, M. E. (2019). Cement production, environmental pollution, and economic growth: Evidence from China and USA. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(4), 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01667-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, P. H., Banthia, N., Alcamand, H. A., Vasconcelos, W. L., & Nunes, E. H. (2016). Performance of blended metakaolin/blastfurnace slag alkali-activated mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 71, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., & Huang, R. (2013). Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 40(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. A., & Hover, K. C. (1993). Mercury porosimetry of cement-based materials and associated correction factors. Construction and Building Materials, 7(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(93)90007-Y
   Google Scholar
• Davidovits, J. (1994). Properties of geopolymer cements [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev, Ukraine, p. 131–149 www.geopolymer.org.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, E. I., Allouche, E. N., & Eklund, S. (2010). Factors affecting the suitability of fly ash as source material for geopolymers. Fuel, 89(5), 992–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxson, P., Provis, J., Lukey, G., Separovic, F., & van Deventer, J. (2005). 29Si NMR study of structural ordering in aluminosilicate geopolymer gels. Langmuir 21(7), 3028–3036. https://doi.org/10.1021/la047336x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J. A., Torre, A. G., Palomo, A., Olmo, G. L., Alonso, M. M., & Aranda, M. A. G. (2006). Alkali activated materials. Fuel, 85(5–6), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.08.014
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Yu, Q. L., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (2015). Properties of alkali activated slag-fly ash blends with limestone addition. Cement and Concrete Composites, 59, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granizo, M. L., Alonso, S., Blanco-Varela, M. T., & Palomo, A. (2004). Alkaline activation of metakaolin: effect of calcium hydroxide in the products of reaction. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 85(1), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00070.x
   Google Scholar
• Gu, K., Maierdan, Y., & Chen, B. (2022). Effects of ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) and its disodium salt derivative (EDTA-Na) on the characteristics of magnesium oxysulfate (MOS) cement. Composites Part B, 232, 109654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109654
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S. E., Gastaldini, A. L. G., Cocco, M., Jahn, S. L., & Terra, L. M. (2019). Synergic effects of the substitution of Portland cement for water treatment plant sludge ash and ground limestone: Technical and economic evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.324
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. (1989). Water sorptivity of mortars and concretes: A review. Magazine of Concrete Research. 41(147), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1989.41.147.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Tse, T. K. M. (1986). Water movement in porous building materials-VII, The sorptivity of mortars. Building and Environment, 21(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(86)90017-X
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Yau, M. H. R. (1987). Water movement in porous building materials-IX. The water absorption and sorptivity of concretes. Building and Environment, 22(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(87)90044-8
   Google Scholar
• Balayssac, J. P. (1993). Relations entre performances mécaniques, microstructure et durabilité des bétons [Thèse de doctorat]. INSA Toulouse.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Sun, H., & Li, L. (2010). A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(9), 1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, K. J. D., & Welter, M. (2014). Geopolymer (aluminosilicate) composites: Synthesis, properties and applications. In I. M. Low (Ed.), Advances in ceramic matrix composites (pp. 445–470). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098825.3.445
   Google Scholar
• Mermerdaş, K., Manguri, S., Nassani, D. E., & Oleiwi, S. M. (2017). Effect of aggregate properties on the mechanical and absorption characteristics of geopolymer mortar. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20(6), 1642–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.11.009
   Google Scholar
• NF EN 13057. (2005). Test methods – Determination of resistance of capillary absorption. AFNOR: Association Francaise de Normalisation.
   Google Scholar
• NF EN 196-1. (2005). Methods of testing cement, Part 1: Determination of strength (pp. 1–33).
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Torgal, F., Abdollahnejad, Z., Camões, A. F., Jamshidi, M., & Ding, Y. (2012). Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis, J. L., Myers, R. J., White, C. E., Rose, V., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2012). X-ray microtomography shows pore structure and tortuosity in alkali-activated binders. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(6), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis, J., & Van Deventer, J. (2009). Geopolymers: Structure, processing, properties and industrial applications. Woodhead Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Provis, J., & van Deventer, J. (2014). Alkali activated materials, state of the art report. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7672-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sarathy, R. V., & Dhinakaran, G. (2014). Strength and durability characteristics of GGBFS based HPC. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(4), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajaps.2014.224.231
   Google Scholar
• Shi, C., & Qian, J. (2000). High performance cementing materials from industrial slags – A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 29(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00060-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, C., Krivenko, P. V., & Roy, D. M. (2006). Alkali-activated. Cements and Concrete, Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482266900
   Google Scholar
• Song, J.-K., Yang, K.-H., Kim, G.-W., Lee, C.-T., Kim, B.-J., & Lee, J.-H. (2010). Properties of sodium alkali-activated ground granulated blast-furnace slag(GGBS) mortar [Paper presentation]. First International Conference on Sustainability and the Future FISC, Paper’s No. BUE-FISC-107. Egypt, elshourouq, Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, C. K., Lukey, G. C., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2005). The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(9), 1688–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, C. K., Lukey, G. C., Provis, J. L., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2008). Effect of calcium silicate sources on geopolymerisation. Cement and Concrete Research, 38(4), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Provis, J. L., Reid, A., & Wang, H. (2014). Geopolymer foam concrete: An emerging material for sustainable construction. Construction and Building Materials. 56, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar