How collaboration networks affect innovation in Korea’s information and communication technology industry in the era of Internet of Things

References

• Ankrah, S.N., Burgess, T.F., Grimshaw, P., and Shaw, N.E. (2013), ‘Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: what single-group studies of motives omit’, Technovation, 33, 50–65. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., and Pianta, M. (1996), ‘Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys’, Technovation, 16(2), 451–468. doi: 10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arranz, N., and Arroyabe, J.C.F. (2008), ‘The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms’, Technovation, 28(1–2), 88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W., and Dietz, J. (2004), ‘R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry’, Research Policy, 33, 209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R.M., Carree, B., and Lokshin, H. (2004), ‘Cooperative R&D and firm performance’, Research Policy, 33(10), 1477–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S., and Cornet, M. (2002), ‘A far friend is worth more than a good neighbor: proximity and innovation in a small country’, Journal of Management and Governance, 6, 169–188. doi: 10.1023/A:1015775321949
   Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L., and Sakakibara, M. (1998), ‘Japanese research consortia: a microeconometric analysis of industrial policy’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 66, 207–233.
   Google Scholar
• Brouthers, K.D., Brouthers, L.E., and Harris, P.C. (1997), ‘The five stages of the cooperative venture strategy process’, Journal of General Management, 23, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E., and Kleinknecht, A. (1999), ‘Innovative output, and a firm’s propensity to patent: an exploration of CIS micro data’, Research Policy, 28, 615–624. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M.G., and Svenson, R.A. (1998), ‘Measuring R&D productivity’, Research Technology Management, 41, 30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., and Nijkamp, P. (2011), ‘Smart cities in Europe’, Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2007), ‘Why companies should have open business models’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48, 22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R.G. (1979), ‘ Identifying industrial new product success: project newprod’, Industrial Marketing Management, 8, 124–135.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R.G. (2008), ‘The stage-gate idea-to-launch process – update, what’s new, and NexGen systems’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 213–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T.K., and Teng, B. (1997), ‘Sustaining strategic alliances: options and guidelines’, Journal of General Management, 22, 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2005), ‘System of innovation: perspectives and challenges’, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, eds. G. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Enkel, E. (2010), ‘Attributes required for profiting from open innovation in networks’, International Journal of Technology Management, 52, 344–371. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.035980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., and Chesbrough, H. (2009), ‘Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon’, R&D Management, 39, 311–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D.S., Hagju, A., and Schmalensee, R. (2006), Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries, London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A., and van Looy, B. (2008), ‘Towards an integrative perspective on alliance governance: connecting contract design, contract application and trust dynamics’, Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1053–1078. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faems, D., van Looy, B., and Debackere, K. (2005), ‘Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 238–250. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M.P., and Kelley, M.R. (2006), ‘The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior’, Research Policy, 35, 1509–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransman, M. (2010), The New ICT Ecosystem, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (2004), ‘Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 541–569. doi: 10.1093/icc/dth022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L.R., Botan, C.H., and Kreps, G.L. (2000), Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methodologies, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fukugawa, N. (2006), ‘Determining factors in innovation of small firm networks: a case of cross industry groups in Japan’, Small Business Economics, 27, 181–193. doi: 10.1007/s11187-006-0010-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galende, J., and de la Fuente, J.M. (2003), ‘Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behavior’, Research Policy, 32, 715–736. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00082-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelijns, A., and Rosenberg, N. (1994), ‘The dynamics of technological change in medicine’, Health Affairs, 13, 28–46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., Zahra, S.A., and Wood, D.R. (2002), ‘The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies’, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 577–609. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., Lerner, J., and Scharfstein, D. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurial spawning: public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999’, Journal of Finance, 60, 577–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00740.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gort, M., and Klepper, S. (1982), ‘Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations’, Economic Journal, 92, 630–653. doi: 10.2307/2232554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. (1990), ‘Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V., and Saeed, K. (2003), ‘The telecommunication industry revisited: the changing pattern of partnerships’, Communications of the ACM, 46, 119–125. doi: 10.1145/792704.792709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, B.H., and Manry, D. (2004), ‘The valid-relevance of R&D and advertising expenditure: evidence from Korea’, The International Journal of Accounting, 39, 101–128. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2004.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Han, J.K., Kim, N., and Srivastava, R.K. (1998), ‘Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?’ Journal of Marketing, 62, 30–45. doi: 10.2307/1252285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (1998), ‘Economics of product development by users: the impact of sticky local information’, Management Science, 44, 629–644. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.44.5.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2005), ‘Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation’, Journal fur Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 63–78. doi: 10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8
   Google Scholar
• Jakobs, K. (2006), ‘Shaping user-side innovation through standardization: the example of ICT’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauch, L.R., Glueck, W.F., and Osborn, R.N. (1978), ‘Organizational loyalty, professional commitment and academic research productivity’, Academic Management Journal, 21, 84–92. doi: 10.2307/255664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, L.C., and Morel, M. (2005), ‘The valuation relevance of R&D expenditure: time series evidence’, International Review of Financial Analysis, 14, 304–325. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2004.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Kale, P., and Singh, H. (2009), ‘Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here?’ Strategic Direction, 23, 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, R. (2002), ‘New product search over time: past studies in their prime?’ Academy of Management Journal, 45, 995–1010. doi: 10.2307/3069326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R., and Ahuja, G. (2002), ‘Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction’, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183–1194. doi: 10.2307/3069433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (1996), ‘Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle’, American Economic Review, 86, 562–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S., and Graddy, E. (1990), ‘The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure’, RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 27–44. doi: 10.2307/2555491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum, S., and Lerner, J. (2000), ‘Does venture capital spur innovation?’ RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 674–692. doi: 10.2307/2696354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and Salter, A. (2006), ‘Open for innovation: the role of open innovativeness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D.H., Dedahanov, A.T., and Rhee, J. (2015), ‘Moderating role of external networks and mediating effect of innovation performance on the relationship between technology orientation and firm performance’, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23, 321–334. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2015.1120498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., and Lee, H. (2011), ‘Application of factor analysis for service R&D classification: a case study on the Korean ICT industry’, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2119–2124. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A. (2005), ‘Organization of knowledge and innovation: the case of Finnish business services’, Industry and Innovation, 12, 185–203. doi: 10.1080/13662710500087925
   Google Scholar
• Lettl, C. (2007), ‘The determinants of innovation: R & D, technology transfer and networking effects’, Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lev, B. (2001), Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting, Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, R.C., Cohen, W.M., and Mowery, D.C. (1985), ‘R&D appropriability opportunity, market structure: new evidence on some Schumpeterian hypothesis’, American Economic Review, 75, 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2008), ‘Open innovation in practice: an analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55, 148–157. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2007.912932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U., and Ernst, H. (2007), ‘External technology commercialization in large firms: results of a quantitative benchmarking study’, R&D Management, 37, 383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U., and Ernst, H. (2009), ‘Opening up the innovation process: the role of technology aggressiveness’, R&D Management, 39, 38–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilien, G.L., Morrison, P.D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., and von Hippel, E. (2002), ‘Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development’, Management Science, 48, 1042–1059. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, L.H., and Mansury, M.A. (2007), ‘External linkages, R&D, and innovation performance in US business services’, Industry and Innovation, 14, 477–496. doi: 10.1080/13662710701711380
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E.S., and Dalum, B. (2002), ‘National systems of production, innovation and competence building’, Research Policy, 31, 213–231. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2004), Sectoral System of Innovation: Concepts, Issues, and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and Truffer, B. (2008), ‘Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro-meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 443–464. doi: 10.1080/09537320802141429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J.S. (1978), ‘Innovation, economic growth and government policy: an economist’s view of the factors controlling technical progress and innovation’, Physics in Technology, 9, 54–60. doi: 10.1088/0305-4624/9/2/I01
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V.L., and Zmud, R.W. (1999), ‘The effects of coupling IT and work process strategies in redesign projects’, Organization Science, 10, 424–438. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Calantone, R. (1994), ‘ Determinants of new product performance: a review and meta-analysis’, Journal of product innovation management, 11, 397–417.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D.C., and Rosenberg, N. (1991), Technology and the pursuit of economic growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. (2002), ‘ Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory’, Academy of Management Review, 27, 392–413.
   Google Scholar
• Narver, J.C., and Slater, S.F. (1990), ‘The effect of a market orientation on business profitability’, Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35. doi: 10.2307/1251757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (1993), Science and Engineering Indicators, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, M.J., and Santamaria, L. (2007), ‘The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation’, Technovation, 27, 367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamuro, H. (2005), ‘ Cooperative R&D by SMEs and Intellectual Property’, Proceedings of the Japan Academy of Small Business Studies, 24, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1997a), National Innovation System, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1997b), Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: The ‘Oslo Manual’, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1998), ‘The social shaping of the national science base’, Research Policy, 27, 793–805. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00091-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. (2007), ‘ University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. (1991), ‘New alliances for policy and the conduct of research and education’, International Journal of Technology Management, 6, 478–487.
   Google Scholar
• Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., and Lock, P. (2008), ‘The dynamics of user innovation: drivers and impediments of innovation activities’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 12, 377–398. doi: 10.1142/S1363919608002060
   Google Scholar
• Reams, R. (1986), University–industry research partnerships: The major legal issues in research and development agreements, Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, W., and von Hippel, E. (1994), ‘Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: the case of scientific instruments’, Research Policy, 23, 459–469. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90008-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romijn, H., and Albaladejo, M. (2002), ‘Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England’, Research Policy, 31, 1053–1067. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. (1982), Learning by using. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 120–140.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, S.A. (1996), ‘Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration’, Research Policy, 25, 247–263. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00835-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomo, S., Steinhoff, F., and Trommsdorff, V. (2003), ‘The concept of customer orientation in substantial innovation projects and its impact on new product development success’, International Journal of Technology Management, 26, 442–463. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, M.D., and Chakrabarti, A.K. (2002), ‘Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions’, Research Policy, 31, 1163–1180. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M.M., and Fröhlich, J. (2002), ‘Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants’, Research Policy, 31, 303–328. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J.T. (1984), ‘Firm versus industry variability in R&D intensity’, in R&D, Patents, and Productivity, ed. Z. Griliches, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 233–245.
   Google Scholar
• Shan, W., Walker, G., and Kogut, B. (1994), ‘Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 387–394. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250150505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, B. (1994), ‘User-supplier links and innovation’, in The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, eds. M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Simard, C., and West, J. (2006), ‘Knowledge networks and the geographic locus of innovation’, in Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, eds. H.W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–240.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., Wong, P., and Ho, Y. (2015), ‘The role of universities in the national innovation systems of China and the east Asian NIEs: an exploratory analysis of publications and patenting data’, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23, 140–156. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2015.1074515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilor, R.W. (1987), ‘ Managing the incubator system: critical success factors to accelerate new company development’, IEEE transactions on Engineering Management, 34, 146–155.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.M., and Parry, M.E. (1997), ‘The determinants of Japanese new product success’, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 64–76. doi: 10.2307/3152065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souitaris, V. (2002), ‘ Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation’, Research Policy, 31, 877–898.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, T.E., Ozdemir, S.Z., and Ding, W.W. (2007), ‘Vertical alliance networks: the case of university-biotechnology-pharmaceutical alliance chains’, Research Policy, 36, 477–498. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. (2002), ‘Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis’, Research Policy, 31, 947–967. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, P.R. (2010), ‘Co-operative ties and innovation: some new evidence for UK manufacturing’, Research Policy, 39, 762–775. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripsas, M., Schrader, S., and Sobrero, M. (1995), ‘Discouraging opportunistic behavior in collaborative R&D: a new role for government’, Research Policy, 24, 367–389. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00771-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006), ‘The interorganizational context of open innovation’, in Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, eds. H.W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 205–219.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbecke, W., van de Vrade, V., and Chesbrough, H.W. (2008), ‘Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 251–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00499.x
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten, S.J. (2000), ‘The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the small business innovation research program’, RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 82–100. doi: 10.2307/2601030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, X.M., Zuo, L.L., Zeng, S.X., and Tam, V.W.Y. (2014), ‘The impacts of network structures and network form on corporate innovative performance: evidence from high-tech sectors’, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22, 185–203. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2014.983678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L.G., and Darby, M.R. (2001), ‘Capturing technological opportunity via Japan’s star scientists: evidence from Japanese firms’ biotech patents and products’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 37–58. doi: 10.1023/A:1007832127813
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., and Armstrong, J.S. (2002), ‘Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology’, Management Science, 48, 138–153. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., and Brewer, M.B. (1998), ‘Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises’, The American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar