Open innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises and innovation efficiency

References

• Ahn, J. M., Minshall, T., & Mortara, L. (2015), Open innovation: A new classification and its impact on firm performance in innovative SMEs, Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. (2000a), Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. (2000b), The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 317–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. (2009), Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation? MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, H., & Iske, P. (2015), Internal capabilities and external knowledge sourcing for product innovation in LMT SMEs, Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984), Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berchicci, L. (2013), Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance, Research Policy, 42(1), 117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, M., Campodall'Orto, S., Frattini, F., & Vercesi, P. (2010), Enabling open innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: How to find alternative applications for your technologies, R&D Management, 40(4), 414–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, M., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011), Exploring the role of human resources in technology out-licensing: An empirical analysis of biotech new technology-based firms, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(8), 825–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, C., Carroll, G. R., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2004), Size, differentiation and the performance of Dutch daily newspapers, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(1), 117–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002), Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities, Research Policy, 31(5), 735–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015), Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators, Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Valentini, G. (2016), Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?, Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1034–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-M., Delmas, M. A., & Lieberman, M. B. (2015), Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research, Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Schwartz, K. (2007), Innovating business models with co-development partnerships, Research-Technology Management, 50(1), 55–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. F., Olesen, M. H., & Kjær, J. S. (2005), The industrial dynamics of open innovation – Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics, Research Policy, 34(10), 1533–1549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989), Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D, The Economic Journal, 99, 569–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, R., Gambardella, A., & Novelli, E. (2013), Research on markets for inventions and implications for R&D allocation strategies, Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 717–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. (1979), Identifying industrial new product success: Project NewProd, Industrial Marketing Management, 8(2), 124–135.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995), Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2013), You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency, Research Policy, 42(6–7), 1239–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, L. M. (1990), Factors affecting the proficient management of product innovation, International Journal of Technology Management, 5(6), 721–730.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998), The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, T., Delbridge, R., & Munday, M. (2005), Understanding innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A process manifest, Technovation, 25(10), 1119–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996), Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms, Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009), Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity, Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J. E., & Rosenthal, S. R. (2011), Service versus manufacturing innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005), Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M. S. (2005), Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms, Technovation, 25(2), 123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, X. (2012), How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation? Research Policy, 41(3), 512–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010), The future of open innovation, R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996), Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3), 191–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. (2002), Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960, Research Policy, 31(4), 477–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., Roijakkers, N., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006), Inter-firm R&D networks: The importance of strategic network capabilities for high-tech partnership formation, British Journal of Management, 17(1), 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel, G. (1991), Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer) (Special Issue: Global Strategy), 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003), Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration, Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashi, I., & Stojčić, N. (2013), The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4, Research Policy, 42(2), 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, A., & Haneda, S. (2008), Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry, Research Policy, 37(10), 1829–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997), Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A. (1993a), Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A. (1993b), Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 20–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarillo, J. C. (1989), Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources, Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johne, A., & Snelson, P. (1988), Auditing product innovation activities in manufacturing firms, R&D Management, 18(3), 227–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefy, M., Kuban, S., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2015), All things great and small: Organizational size, boundaries of the firm, and a changing environment, Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 715–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R. (2002), New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 995–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002), Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction, Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982), Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups, R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, W. (1996), Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development, Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 199–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchell, S. (1997), CEO characteristics and technological innovativeness: A Canadian perspective, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de L'Administration, 14(2), 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. O. N. (1992), Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study, Research Policy, 21(4), 347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, C., Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. (2012), Selective search, sectoral patterns, and the impact on product innovation performance, Research Policy, 41(8), 1344–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001), Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, A. (1992), Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships, Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 76–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998), The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances, Organization Science, 9(3), 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006), Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014), The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration, Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-S., Park, J.-H., & Bae, Z.-T. (2016), The effects of open innovation on innovation productivity: Focusing on external knowledge search, Knowledge Management Research, 17(1), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010), Open innovation in SMEs – An intermediated network model, Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010), Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth, Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone, M. I., & Reichstein, T. (2012), Licensing-in fosters rapid invention! The effect of the grant-back clause and technological unfamiliarity, Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 965–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2008), Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2011), Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Vahter, P. (2014), Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages, Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1703–1716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991), Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., & Oxley, J. E. (1995), Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996), Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R. (2004), R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation, Technovation, 24(2), 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied linear statistical models (3rd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2010), Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms, Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 44–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996), Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. The measurement of scientific and technological activities (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, A. L. (2001), Strategic alliances and the learning life-cycle of biotechnology firms, Organization Studies, 22(3), 467–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996), Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (K) plan participation rates, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012), Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance, Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1998), Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t, Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433–452.
   Google Scholar
• Piergiovanni, R., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (1997), From which source do small firms derive their innovative inputs? Some evidence from Italian industry, Review of Industrial Organization, 12(2), 243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003), Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986), Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive advantage, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, A., Criscuolo, P., & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2014), Coping with open innovation: Responding to the challenges of external engagement in R&D, California Management Review, 56(2), 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, P., & Souder, W. E. (1987), The strategic management of technological innovations: A review and a model, Journal of Management Studies, 24(1), 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirilli, G., & Evangelista, R. (1998), Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: Results from Italian surveys, Research Policy, 27(9), 881–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011), Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries, Technovation, 31(1), 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013), Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises, Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008), Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital, Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (1986), Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009), Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. (1958), Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables, Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, M., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2017), How start-ups successfully organize and manage open innovation with large companies, European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Panne, G., van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. (2003), Success and failure of innovation: A literature review, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 309–338.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009), Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges, Technovation, 29(6–7), 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Vrande, V., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Gassmann, O. (2010), Broadening the scope of open innovation: Past research, current state and future directions, International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3), 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbano, C., Crema, M., & Venturini, K. (2015), The identification and characterization of open innovation profiles in Italian small and medium-sized enterprises, Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1052–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R. (1997), Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing, Research Policy, 26(3), 303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R. (1998), Collaboration in R&D: An assessment of theoretical and empirical findings, De Economist, 146(3), 419–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (1998), The sources of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vossen, R. W. (1998), Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation, International Small Business Journal, 16(3), 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Vrgovic, P., Vidicki, P., Glassman, B., & Walton, A. (2012), Open innovation for SMEs in developing countries – An intermediated communication network model for collaboration beyond obstacles, Innovation, 14(3), 290–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014), Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. (1984), Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 5(3–4), 287–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynarczyk, P., Piperopoulos, P., & McAdam, M. (2013), Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: An overview, International Small Business Journal, 31(3), 240–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar