Technology innovation ambidexterity, business model ambidexterity, and firm performance in Chinese high-tech firms

References

• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima, K., Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2005). The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 464–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aversa, P., Furnari, S., & Haefliger, S. (2015). Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in formula one racing, 2005–2013. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(3), 655–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. (2013). Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 419–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beverland, M. B., Ewing, M. T., & Jekanyika Matanda, M. (2006). Driving-market or market-driven? A case study analysis of the new product development practices of Chinese business-to-business firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 383–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., & Liu, Z. (2018), How does TMT transactive memory system drive innovation ambidexterity? Shared leadership as mediator and team goal orientations as moderators. Chinese Management Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Yang, Z., Dou, W., & Wang, F. (2018). Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(1), 97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Zhu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2017). A study of factors influencing disruptive innovation in Chinese smes. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 25(1), 140–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W. S., & Lai, S. C. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. (2007). Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., Jiang, W., & Wang, G. G. (2016). Effects of external and internal sources on innovation performance in Chinese high-tech SMEs: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. RE: A Global Perspective .
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herhausen, D. (2016). Unfolding the ambidextrous effects of proactive and responsive market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2585–2593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, B., & Chen, W. (2015). Business model ambidexterity and technological innovation performance: Evidence from China. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 28(5), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., Martin, S. L., Morgan, R. E., & Robson, M. J. (2010). Realizing product-market advantage in high-technology international new ventures: The mediating role of ambidextrous innovation. Journal of International Marketing, 18(4), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, M., Möller, K., Parvinen, P., Evanschitzky, H., & Mühlbacher, H. (2010). Strategic marketing and business performance: A study in three European ‘engineering countries’. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1300–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen , J J P, Simsek, Z, & Cao , Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross-level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1286–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., Martin, K. D., & Saini, A. (2012). The role of a firm’s strategic orientation dimensions in determining market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 715–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, D. D., Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs' transformational leadership on firm innovation. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 582–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., & Oshri, I. (2014). Business model renewal and ambidexterity: Structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a cloud business model. R&D Management, 44(3), 322–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klang, D., Wallnöfer, M., & Hacklin, F. (2014). The business model paradox: A systematic review and exploration of antecedents. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 454–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Scheer, L., & Kotler, P. (2000). From market driven to market driving. European Management Journal, 18(2), 129–142.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 58–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Huang, H. C. (2014). Top management team social capital, exploration-based innovation, and exploitation-based innovation in SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(1), 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.E., McDonough III, E.F., Yang, J., & Wang, C. (2017), Aligning knowledge assets for exploitation, exploration, and ambidexterity: A study of companies in high-tech parks in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(2), 122–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Buck, T. (2007). Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy, 36(3), 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Ding, X.-h., Guo, H., & Luo, J.-h. (2014). How does slack affect product innovation in high-tech Chinese firms: The contingent value of entrepreneurial orientation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 47–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, M. A., Blankson, C., Owusu-Frimpong, N., Nwankwo, S., & Trang, T. P. (2016). Market orientation, learning orientation and business performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(5), 623–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markides, C. C. (2013). Business model innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. E., & Berthon, P. (2008). Market orientation, generative learning, innovation strategy and business performance inter-relationships in bioscience firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1329–1353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 1994, 20–38.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Vokurka, R. J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 387–405.
   Google Scholar
• Osiyevskyy, O., & Dewald, J. (2015). Explorative versus exploitative business model change: The cognitive antecedents of firm-level responses to disruptive innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1), 58–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quitzow, R. (2015). Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 126–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen, T., & Karhu, P. (2017). New organizational forms of innovation: What is business model ambidexterity? In ISPIM Innovation Symposium. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) (pp. 1–15). Melbourne: The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, F., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2016). Beyond listening: The distinct effects of proactive versus responsive customer orientation on the reduction of uncertainties at the fuzzy front end of innovation. R&D Management, 3, 121.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieth, P., Schneckenberg, D., & Ricart, J. E. (2014). Business model innovation–state of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Management, 44(3), 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratman, J. K., & Roth, A. V. (2002). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: Two-stage multi-item scale development and validation. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M., & Liu, Z. (2014). Paths to success: An ambidexterity perspective on how responsive and proactive market orientations affect SMEs' business performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(5), 420–441.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Z. L., Zhao, J., & Zhang, C. L. (2014). Organizational ambidexterity, market orientation, and firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 134–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W. T., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2014). The impacts of marketing and operations capabilities on financial performance in the UK retail sector: A resource-based perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria, Z., Roslin, R. M., & Daud, N. M. (2011). The influence of market orientation on the commitment, trust and relational norms in the education context. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 8875–8890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. A., Edgar, F., Geare, A., & O’Kane, C. (2016). The interactive effects of entrepreneurial orientation and capability-based HRM on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar