Enhancing radical innovation: the interplays of open innovation activities, firm capabilities, and environmental dynamism

References

• Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W., & Sinkula, J. (2007). Does market orientation facilitate balanced innovation programs? An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 316–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicen, P., & Johnson, W. (2015). Radical innovation with limited resources in high-turbulent markets: The role of lean innovation capability. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 278–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., Zobel, A., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., … Hagedoorn, J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Valentini, G. (2016). Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1034–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., & Huizingh, E. (2014). When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1235–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., Yang, C., & Sheu, C. (2016). Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 41, 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2017). The future of open innovation: The future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), 35–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, M., Von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Stephan, P. (2017). Organizing for radical innovation: Exploring novel insights. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4), 394–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York, NY: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-González, J., López-Sáez, P., Navas-López, J., & Delgado-Verde, M. (2015). Open search strategies and firm performance: The different moderating role of technological environmental dynamism. Technovation, 35, 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., Eisenhardt, K., & Bingham, C. (2009). Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3), 413–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, F., Kraus, S., & Covin, J. G. (2014). Traveling into unexplored territory: Radical innovativeness and the role of networking, customers, and technologically turbulent environments. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1385–1393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 1105–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, P., Grimshaw, P., & Pandza, K. (2017). Accelerating the innovation process: A systematic review and realist synthesis of the research literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 510–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkel, E., Dingler, A., & Mangels, C. (2017). Open innovation: Enhancing theory and practice by integrating the role of innovation communication. In Strategy and communication for innovation (pp. 131–145). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Olmos, M., & Ramírez-Alesón, M. (2017). How internal and external factors influence the dynamics of SME technology collaboration networks over time. Technovation, 64–65, 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flor, M., Cooper, S., & Oltra, M. (2018). External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms. European Management Journal, 36(2), 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D., & Anderson, J. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Tatham, R., Anderson, R., & Black, W. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C., & Winter, S. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchen, E., Hitchen, E., Nylund, P., Nylund, P., Ferràs, X., Ferràs, X., … Mussons, S. (2017). Social media: Open innovation in SMEs finds new support. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(3), 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., McNamara, P., & McLoughlin, D. (2015). Outbound open innovation in bio-pharmaceutical out-licensing. Technovation, 35, 46–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurial networks and open innovation: The role of strategic and embedded ties. Industry and Innovation, 24(4), 403–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizingh, E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, K. P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10), 368–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and develop. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jap, S. (1999). Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S., Whiteman, G., & van den Ende, J. (2017). Radical innovation for sustainability: The power of strategy and open innovation. Long Range Planning, 50(6), 712–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G., & Huh, M. G. (2015). Exploration and organizational longevity: The moderating role of strategy and environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2), 389–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., Kim, D. J., & Lee, S. (2015). Antecedents of open innovation at the project level: Empirical analysis of Korean firms. R&D Management, 45(5), 411–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Cho, H., & Shin, J. (2015). The relationship between inbound open innovation patents and financial performance: Evidence from global information technology companies. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, Y., & Sinkovics, R. (2013). Crossing borders and industry sectors: Behavioral governance in strategic alliances and product innovation for competitive advantage. Long Range Planning, 46(1), 13–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: Examining environmental influences. R&D Management, 39(4), 317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. (2012). Cross-sector alliances for corporate social responsibility partner heterogeneity moderates environmental strategy outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Vega, H., Tell, F., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2016). Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation. Research Policy, 45(1), 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manotungvorapun, N., & Gerdsri, N. (2016). Complementarity vs. compatibility: What really matters for partner selection in open innovation? International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 5(2), 122–139.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, H., & O’Toole, T. (2013). Enablers and inhibitors of the development of network capability in entrepreneurial firms: A study of the Irish micro-brewing network. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), 1141–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Yannopoulos, P. (2014). Customer and supplier involvement in design: The moderating role of incremental and radical innovation capability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrega, M., Forkmann, S., Ramos, C., & Henneberg, S. (2012). Networking capability in business relationships—concept and scale development. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5), 739–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortara, L., & Minshall, T. (2011). How do large multinational companies implement open innovation? Technovation, 31(10), 586–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Parida, V., Patel, P. C., Wincent, J., & Kohtamäki, M. (2016). Network partner diversity, network capability, and sales growth in small firms. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2113–2117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P. C., Fernhaber, S. A., McDougall-Covin, P. P., & van der Have, R. P. (2014). Beating competitors to international markets: The value of geographically balanced networks for innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 691–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. (1981). Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piening, E., & Salge, T. (2015). Understanding the antecedents, contingencies, and performance implications of process innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., & Podsakoff, N. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K., Curran, P., & Bauer, D. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. (2016). Gender diversity in top management teams and innovation capabilities: The initial public offerings of biotechnology firms. Long Range Planning, 49(4), 507–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisodiya, S., Johnson, J., & Grégoire, Y. (2013). Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 836–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, S., Mohr, J., & Sengupta, S. (2014). Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 552–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., & Thieme, J. (2009). The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, K. M. (1994). What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1360–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Lu, I., & Chen, C. (2008). Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation, 28(6), 349–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, B., & Heidenreich, S. (2018). When and with whom to cooperate? Investigating effects of cooperation stage and type on innovation capabilities and success. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 334–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilden, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2015). The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: Investigating the role of environmental turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam, R., Lo, W., Tang, E., & Lau, A. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 40(3), 391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Cui, Y., & Zheng, M. B. (2016). Two-way open innovation and firm growth: The moderating effect of external environment. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 24(1), 123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., Wei, L., Yang, J., & Zhu, L. (2018). Roles of relationships between large shareholders and managers in radical innovation: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 88–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar