253
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Measuring the efficiency, effectiveness and changeability of institutions for improving national innovation system

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Amable, B. (1999). Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 645–687. doi: 10.1080/096922900750034572
  • Andersen, B., & Fagerhaug, T. (2000, June 28–30). Performance measurement of logistics processes. Proc. ICT in Logistics & production management, IFIP WG5.7, Tronso, Norway.
  • Bassanini, A., & Ernst, E. (2002). Labour market regulation, industrial relations and technological regimes: A tale of comparative advantage. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 391–426. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.3.391
  • Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00342-6
  • Bleischwitz, R. (2003). Cognitive and institutional perspectives of eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 453–467. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00186-1
  • Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0136
  • Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management science, 32(5), 539–553. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
  • Casson, M. C., Della Giusta, M., & Kambhampati, U. S. (2010). Formal and informal institutions and development. World Development, 38(2), 137–141. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.008
  • Cincera, M., & Capron, H. (2001). Assessing the institutional set-up of national innovation systems (No.2013/147105). ULB–Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. The American Economic Review, 26(1), 237–249.
  • Coriat, B., & Weinstein, O. (2002). Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Research Policy, 31(2), 273–290. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00141-X
  • Correa, C. M. (1998). Argentina’s national innovation system. International Journal of Technology Management, 15(6–7), 721–760. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1998.002627
  • Davis, L., & North, D. (1970). Institutional change and American economic growth: A first step towards a theory of institutional innovation. The Journal of Economic History, 30(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700078633
  • Dequech, D. (2017). Some institutions (social norms and conventions) of contemporary mainstream economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(6), 1627–1652. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex014
  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). University of Chicago Press.
  • Di Martino, P. (2012). Legal institutions, social norms, and entrepreneurship in Britain (c. 1890–c. 1939) 1. The Economic History Review, 65(1), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2010.00601.x
  • Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (1988). Technical change and economic theory. Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies.
  • Edquist, C. (2001, June 12–15). The systems of innovation approach and innovation policy: An account of the state of the art. DRUID Conference, Aalborg (pp. 12-15).
  • Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B. A. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems (pp. 265–298). Oxford University Press.
  • Fatehrad, M., & Taghiyari, H. (2005). Entrepreneur universities, national innovative system and knowledge-based development. Roshde-Fanavari, 1(4), 19–25.
  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.
  • Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6), 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
  • Ghazinoori, S., Roshani, S., & Rezaeinik, N. (2014). 5 Years of evolution and theatrical development of Journal of Science & Technology Policy (JSTP). 6(2), 17-38.
  • Ghazinoory, S., Farazkish, M., & Afshari-Mofrad, M. (2013). The use of nano-filtration metaphor in extracting technology strategy for nanotechnology-based enterprises. Engineering Economics, 24(5), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.5915
  • Ghazinoory, S., & Ghazinoori, S. (2006). Developing Iran’s government strategies for strengthening the national system of innovation using SWOT analysis. Science and Public Policy, 33(7), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778759
  • Ghazinoory, S., & Ghazinoori, S. (2008). Extracting strategies for modification of the national innovation system of Iran based on a comparative study. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 1(1), 65–81.
  • Goodarzi, M., & Bagheri, S. K. (2005). Intellectual property system of Iran: A closer look. Roshd-e-Fanavari, 1(3), 16–24.
  • Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483-498. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grj028
  • Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41(1), 102-115. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.001
  • Henri, J. F. (2004). Performance measurement and organizational effectiveness: Bridging the gap. Managerial Finance, 30(6), 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350410769137
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2004). Reclaiming habit for institutional economics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(5), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2003.03.001
  • Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922900750034563
  • Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P. A., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: The case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00074-4
  • Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 6, 143–163.
  • Kanwar, S. (2007). Business enterprise R&D, technological change, and intellectual property protection. Economics Letters, 96(1), 120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.12.020
  • Kuhlmann, S., & Arnold, E. (2001). RCN in the Norwegian research and innovation system. Fraunhofer ISI, Background Report No. 12 in the Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway, Technopolis, Brighton.
  • Lee, J. D., & Park, C. (2006). Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: Factors affecting success and failure in Korea. Technovation, 26(9), 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.004
  • Lowes, S., Nunn, N., Robinson, J. A., & Weigel, J. L. (2017). The evolution of culture and institutions: Evidence from the Kuba Kingdom. Econometrica, 85(4), 1065–1091. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14139
  • Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National innovation system: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
  • Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
  • Meeus, M., & Oerlemans, L. (2005). National innovation systems. In: Casper. S, Waarden, and F. van (Eds.) Innovations and institutions. A multidisciplinary review of the study of innovation systems. New Horizons of the Economics of Innovation series (pp. 51-67). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Menezes-Filho, N., Ulph, D., & Van Reenen, J. (1998). The determination of R&D: Empirical evidence on the role of unions. European Economic Review, 42(3), 919–930. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00140-2
  • Moseng, B. O. R., & Bredrup, H. (1993). A methodology for industrial studies of productivity performance. Production Planning & Control, 4(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537289308919439
  • Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (1999). Explaining industrial leadership. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175128.009
  • Nelson, R. R. (2008). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy, 37(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.008
  • Nelson, R.R. & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31, 265–272. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00140-8
  • Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are ‘x-efficient’ (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00142-1
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
  • North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.
  • Orstavik, F., & Nas, S. O. (1998). Institutional mapping of the Norwegian national system of innovation. STEP-gruppen.
  • Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems. STI Review, 14, 9–32.
  • Potts, J. (2007). Clarence ayres memorial lecture: Evolutionary institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507020
  • Rihoux, B., & Grimm, H.2006). Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative divide. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3–31. doi: 10.1007/BF02699764
  • Ruttan, V. W., & Hayami, Y. (1984). Toward a theory of induced institutional innovation. The Journal of Development Studies, 20(4), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388408421914
  • Sabbi, M., & Ayeko-Kümmeth, J. (2015). Actors, institutions and change: Perspectives on Africa. Bayreuth African studies Working Papers, 13, Germany.
  • Soroush, A. (2009). The expansion of prophetic experience: Essays on historicity, contingency and plurality in religion. Brill.
  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press.
  • Turban, E., Leidner, D., McLean, E., & Wetherbe, J. (2008). Information technology for management. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Van Marrewijk, M. (2010). Strategic orientations: Multiple ways for implementing sustainable performance. Technology and Investment, 1(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2010.12010
  • Varsakelis, N. C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1083–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.002
  • Veblen, T. (1973). The theory of the leisure class (p. 154). Project Gutenberg.
  • Wallner, J. (2008). Legitimacy and public policy: Seeing beyond effectiveness, efficiency, and performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00275.x
  • Watanabe, C. (2009). Managing innovation in Japan: The role institutions play in helping or hindering how companies develop technology. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8), 1407–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.004
  • Weems, G. H., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 166. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069033
  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.