Open innovation strategy and performance of SMEs in the IT industry located in Korea’s innovation clusters: the role of government subsidies

References

• Almus, M., & Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500103288618918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., & NandKumar, A. (2011). Cash-Out or flameout! opportunity cost and entrepreneurial strategy: Theory, and evidence from the information security industry. Management Science, 57(10), 1844–1860. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., & Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00033-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athreye, S. S., & Keeble, D. (2002). Sources of increasing returns and regional innovation in the UK. Regional Studies, 36(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220131124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aw, B. Y., & Song, B. (2013). Firm's choice between export and R&D and its effect on the firm's productivity and survival. Global Economic Review, 42(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2013.833848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherzadeh, M., Markovic, S., Cheng, J., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2020). How does outside-in open innovation influence innovation performance? Analyzing the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and innovation strategy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2889538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of the eureka program. Research Policy, 39(10), 1375–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayus, B. L., Erickson, G., & Jacobson, R. (2003). The financial rewards of New product introductions in the personal computer industry. Management Science, 49(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.2.197.12741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., & Breschi, S. (2000). Does ‘clustering’ really help firms’ innovative activities? Manchester Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bou-Wen Lin, C.-J. C., & Wu, H.-L. (2006). Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.861813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge transfer In international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinger, H.-J., Auernhammer, K., & Gomeringer, A. (2004). Managing innovation networks in the knowledge-driven economy. International Journal of Production Research, 42(17), 3337–3353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540410001695970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busom, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(2), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590000000006
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. H., Martin, J. D., & Kensinger, J. W. (1990). Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90005-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MITSloan Manangement Review, 44(3), 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2011). R&D subsidies and the performance of high-tech start-ups. Economics Letters, 112(1), 97–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., & Fier, A. (2007). The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1347–1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2004). The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending and technological performance. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), 04-56, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, X., & Cheng, L. (2015). The effect of public subsidies on corporate R&D investment: An application of the generalized propensity score. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijk, B. V., Hertog, R. D., Menkveld, B., & Thurik, R. (1997). Some New evidence on the determinants of large- and small-firm innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007995919950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Edited by foundations for organizational science. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ebersberger, B., Bloch, C., Herstad, S. J., & Van De Velde, E. L. S. (2012). Open innovation practices and their effect on innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 09((6)), https://doi.org/10.1142/s021987701250040x
   Google Scholar
• Einiö, E. (2014). R&D subsidies and company performance: Evidence from geographic variation in government funding based on the ERDF population-density rule. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 710–728. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etxeberria, P. C., & Uranga, M. G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30(9), 1563–1584. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faems, D., de Visser, M., Andries, P., & Van Looy, B. (2010). Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: Value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flatten, T. C., Greve, G. I., & Brettel, M. (2011). Absorptive capacity and firm performance in SMEs: The mediating influence of strategic alliances. European Management Review, 8(3), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fores, B., & Camison, C. (200). The Complementary effect of internal learning capacity and absorptive capacity on performance: the mediating role of innovation capacity. International Journal of Technology Management.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornahl, D., Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2011). What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortune, A., & Shelton, L. M. (2014). Age matters: Disentangling the effect of R&D investment in the global chemical products industry. Business Management Dynamics, 3(11), 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Xu, K., & Yang, J. (2008). Managerial ties, absorptive capacity, and innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9096-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P., Machin, S., & Van Reenen, J. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 24(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghapar, F., Brooks, R., & Smyth, R. (2014). The impact of patenting activity on the financial performance of Malaysian firms. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 19(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2014.908536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. R., & McCann, P. (2005). Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(5), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbh072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: Why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core” competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurău, C., & Lasch, F. (2011). Open innovation strategies in the UK biopharmaceutical sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 3(4), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2011.043386
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00137-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Huang, F., & Rice, J. (2009). The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating “open innovation” outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(02), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002261
   Google Scholar
• Hung, K.-P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10-11), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvarinen, J. (2006). Behavioural additionality of public R&D funding in Finland. In In government R&D funding and company behaviour: Measuring behavioural additionality (pp. 115–126). OECD.
   Google Scholar
• ICT, Ministry of Science and. (2020). “2019 INNOPOLIS Statistics.” In. Sejong: Ministry of Science and ICT.
   Google Scholar
• Inauen, M., Carlsson, S., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2011). The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111174934
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (2002). Building programme evaluation into The design of public research-support programmes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, P. C., Carlos de Oliveira, A., & Lopes, T. M. (2008). Knowledge transfer in product development processes: A case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal-mechanic sector from São Paulo, Brazil. Technovation, 28(1-2), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, W. J., Lee, B. H., & Oh, W. G. (2012). The effects of the utilization of external resources On the technological innovation performance along the stages of growth in Korean ventures. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.7.1.201203.35
   Google Scholar
• Kazanjian, R. K. (1998). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L. (1998). Technology policies and strategies for developing countries: Lessons from the Korean experience. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klette, T. J., & Moen, J. (2011). “R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: A theoretical analysis and a microeconometric study.” In.: Norwegian School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Klomp, L., & Van Leeuwen, G. (2001). Linking innovation and firm performance: A new approach. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510110079612
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, M. P., Dalum, B., & Villumsen, G. (2001). Two faces of absorptive capacity creation: Access and utilisation of knowledge. The Nelson and winter conference, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, A. M. (2020). Towards an Asian model of clusters and cluster policy: The super cluster strategy. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(4), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.04.05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. Y., & Kwon, I. (2019). R&D spillovers for public R&D productivity. Global Economic Review, 48(3), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2019.1638812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, S. A., Walters, B., & Kroll, M. (2006). The moderating effects of external monitors on the relationship between R&D spending and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-Y. (2009). Do firms in clusters invest in R&D more intensively? Theory and evidence from multi-country data. Research Policy, 38(7), 1159–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 615–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Kang, S.-M. (2007). Innovation types and productivity growth: Evidence from Korean manufacturing firms. Global Economic Review, 36(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265080701694512
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. M., & Terleckyj, N. E. (1983). Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: A macroeconomic analysis. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(2), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003656
   Google Scholar
• Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2007). Developing reputation to overcome the imperfections in the markets for knowledge. Research Policy, 36(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B.-W., & Chen, J.-S. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: A study of technology intensive firms. R and D Management, 35(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science, 32(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, M., Lhuillery, S., Parrotta, P., & Sala, D. (2016). Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy, 45(9), 1715–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1890). "Some aspects of competition." The address of the president of section F-- economic science and statistics--of the British association, at the sixtiet meeting, held at Leeds, in September, 1890. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 53(4), 612–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/2979546
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. G., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & García, M. S. (2014). Open innovation strategies in the food and drink industry: Determinants and impact on innovation performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 66(2/3), https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2014.064588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2011). Performance differentials within geographic clusters. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning. (2017). 2015 INNOPOLIS Statistics. In. Republic of Korea: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning(MSIP).
   Google Scholar
• Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation, 24(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00045-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. Y., Shin, G.-C., & Jurn, I. (2009). Corporate strategies and performances of Korean firms: The unified theory of the firm perspective. Global Economic Review, 38(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265080902891818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New economics of competition, harvard business review. Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Santamaría, L., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2010). Public selection and financing of R&D cooperative projects: Credit versus subsidy funding. Research Policy, 39(4), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sein, Y. Y., & Prokop, V. (2021). Mediating role of firm R&D in creating product and process innovation: Empirical evidence from Norway. Economies, 9(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, C. (2012). R&D and firm performance: evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 17(2), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2012.668094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, Y. E., & Voudouris, I. (2009). Antecedents and trajectories of AMT adoption: The case of Greek manufacturing SMEs. Research Policy, 38(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Startups, Ministry of SMEs and. (2020). “2020 survey of Korea venture firms.” In 1–185. Sejong: Minister of SMEs and Startups.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Fischer, W. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity and new product development. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00040-7
   Google Scholar
• Swann, R. B., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2013). Research collaboration and R&D outsourcing: Different R&D personnel requirements in SMEs. Technovation, 33(4), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K.-H., & Wang, J.-C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in interorganizational network: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Li, Y., & Sun, J. (2019). The transformation effect of R&D subsidies on firm performance: An empirical study based on signal financing and innovation incentives. Chinese Management Studies, 14(2), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-02-2019-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2014). R&D activities in start-up firms: What can we learn from founding resources? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(5), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.870990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K.-H. (2013). The effect of R&D subsidies on firm growth in Taiwan. Internaltional Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. (2011). Innovation and economic growth in China: evidence at the provincial level. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 16(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2011.564752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, H., & Huang, W. (2022). Effect of R&D subsidies on external collaborative networks and the sustainable innovation performance of strategic emerging enterprises: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(8), 4722. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management, 27(2), 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Zhao, S., & Abbas, A. (2020). Relationship between R&D grants, R&D investment, and innovation performance: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1), e1973. doi:10.1002/pa.1973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar