Developing and testing a habitat suitability index model for Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) and its potential for landscape management decisions in Korea

References

• Brown RE. 1991. The biology of deer. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SK, Buja KR, Jury SH, Monaco ME, Banner A. 2000. Habitat suitability index models for eight fish and invertebrate species in Casco and Sheepscot Bays, Maine. N Am J Fish Manage. 20:408–435. doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0408:HSIMFE>2.3.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Cho YJ. 2010. Survey and resource management of wildlife. Sejong: Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Clark RC, Christensen JD, Monaco ME, Caldwell PA, Matthews GA, Minello TJ. 2004. A habitat-use model to determine essential fish habitat for juvenile brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) in Galveston Bay, Texas. Fish Bull. 102:264–277.
   Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Stenback JM, Barrett RH. 1993. Mapping deer habitat suitability using remote sensing and geographic information system. Geocarto Int. 8:23–33. doi: 10.1080/10106049309354417
   Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Farrell A. 1983. Chinese water deer. London: The British Deer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Deperno CS, Jenks JA, Griffin SL. 2003. Multidimensional cover characteristics: is variation in habitat selection related to white-tailed deer sexual segregation? J Mammal. 84:1316–1329. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<1316:MCCIVI>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 2000. ArcView GIS version 3.2a. Redlands (CA): Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Folk ML. 1991. Habitat of the Key deer [Ph.D. Thesis]. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University.
   Google Scholar
• Fulbright TE, Alfonso OS. 2006. White-tailed deer habitat: ecology and management on rangelands. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett. 8:993–1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SH, Seo MH, Kang SG, Nam SM, Yeom GS. 2015. Wildlife survey. Incheon: National Institute of Biological Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Herben T, Munzbergova Z, Milden M, Ehrlen J, Cousins SA, Eriksson O. 2006. Long-term spatial dynamics of Succisa pratensis in a changing rural landscape: linking dynamical modelling with historical maps. J Ecol. 94:131–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01063.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzel AH, Lay GL. 2008. Habitat suitability modeling and niche theory. J Appl Ecol. 45:1372–1381. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge PN, Eichenlaub WM, Solomon EK. 1999. The animal movement program. Geological Survey, Alaska Biological Science Center. Available from: http://www.absc.usgs.gov/glba/gistools
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied logistic regression. New York (NY): Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List criteria. Available from: http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/red-lists.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kang JG, Ko SJ, Kim HC, Chong ST, Klein TA, Chae JB, Jo YS, Choi KS, Yu DH, Park BK, et al. 2016. Prevalence of Anaplasma and Bartonella spp. in ticks collected from Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus). Korean J Parasitol. 54:87–91. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.1.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BJ, Oh DH, Chun SH, Lee SD. 2011. Distribution, density, and habitat use of the Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) in Korea. Landscape Ecol Eng. 7:291–297. doi: 10.1007/s11355-010-0127-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TE, Oh SY, Chang EM, Jang YK. 2014. Host availability hypothesis: complex interactions with abiotic factors and predators may best explain population densities of cicada species. Anim Cells Syst. 18:143–153. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2014.906501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Gartner D, Mou P, Trettin C. 2000. A landscape model (LEEMATH) to evaluate effects of management impacts on timber and wildlife habitat. Comput Electron Agric. 27:263–292. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00088-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margules CR, Pressey RL, Williams PH. 2002. Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J Biosci. 27:309–326. doi: 10.1007/BF02704962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard S. 2002. Applied logistic regression analysis (quantitative applications in the social sciences). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak RM. 1991. Walker’s mammals of the world. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortigosa RG, De Leo GA, Gatto M. 2000. VVF: integrating modeling and GIS in a software tool for habitat suitability assessment. Environ Model Softw. 15:1–12. doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00029-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhim SJ, Lee WS. 2007. Influence of forest fragmentation on the winter abundance of mammals in Mt. Chirisan National Park, South Korea. J Wildlife Manage. 71:1404–1408. doi: 10.2193/2005-584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers AR, Carr AP. 1998. The home range extension for ArcView: user’s manual. Thunder Bay: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff GJ, Kernohan BJ. 1999. Evaluating reliability of habitat suitability index models. Wildlife Soc Bull. 27:973–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouget M, Cowling RM, Lombard AT, Knight AT, Graham IHK. 2006. Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv Biol. 20:549–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00297.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Wall WA. 2002. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Covelo (CA): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki M, Miyashita T, Kabaya H, Ochiai K, Asada M, Tange T. 2008. Deer density affects ground-layer vegetation differently in conifer plantations and hardwood forests on the Boso Peninsula, Japan. Ecol Res. 23:151–158. doi: 10.1007/s11284-007-0348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyre AJ, Tenhumberg B, Field SA, Niejalke D, Parris K, Possingham HP. 2003. Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecol Appl. 13:1790–1801. doi: 10.1890/02-5078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1981. Standards for the Development of Habitat Suitability Index Models for Use in the Habitat Evaluation Procedures. Washington (DC): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vico G, Porporato A. 2009. Probabilistic description of topographic slope and aspect. J Geophys Res. 114:F01011. doi: 10.1029/2008JF001038
   Google Scholar
• Welk E. 2004. Constraints in range predictions of invasive plant species due to non-equilibrium distribution patterns: purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. Ecol Modell. 179:551–567. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won PH. 1967. Illustrated flora and fauna of Korea: mammals. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Woo HC, Lee JI, Son SW, Park HS. 1990. Ecological survey of mammals in South Korea (IV). Seoul: Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang E, Teng L, Wu Y. 2006. Habitat selection of the Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis) in Yancheng Reserve, Jiangsu Province. Acta Theriol Sin. 26:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou SC, Zhang MH. 2011. An integrated analysis into the causes of ungulate mortality in the Wanda Mountains (Heilongjiang Province, China) and an evaluation of habitat quality. Biol Conserv. 144:2517–2523. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar