A genomic estimated breeding value-assisted reduction method of single nucleotide polymorphism sets: a novel approach for determining the cutoff thresholds in genome-wide association studies and best linear unbiased prediction

References

• Bermingham ML, Pong-Wong R, Spiliopoulou A, Hayward C, Rudan I, Campbell H, Wright AF, Wilson JF F, Navarro P. 2015. Application of high-dimensional feature selection: evaluation for genomic prediction in man. Sci Rep. 5:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning SR, Browning BL. 2007. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 81:1084–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. 2015. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 4:s13742-13015-10047-13748.
   Google Scholar
• Endelman JB. 2011. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. The plant genome.4.
   Google Scholar
• Glickman ME, Rao SR, Schultz MR. 2014. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 67:850–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Cáceres W, Ramayo-Caldas Y, Sánchez JP. 2022. Longitudinal modelling of performance and feed efficiency traits in growing Duroc pigs. Livest Sci. 256:104824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang DW, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Collins JR, Alvord WG, Roayaei J, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. 2007. The DAVID gene functional classification tool: a novel biological module-centric algorithm to functionally analyze large gene lists. Genome Biol. 8:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RC, Nelson GW, Troyer JL, Lautenberger JA, Kessing BD, Winkler CA, 'Brien O, J S. 2010. Accounting for multiple comparisons in a genome-wide association study (GWAS). BMC Genomics. 11:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel BN, Snelling WM, Lindholm-Perry AK, Oliver WT, Kuehn LA, Rohrer GA. 2020. Using SNP weights derived from gene expression modules to improve GWAS power for feed efficiency in pigs. Front Genet. 10:1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y-S, Jeong H, Taye M, Kim HJ, Ka S, Ryu Y-C, Cho S. 2015. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) and its application for improving the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of the berkshire pork quality traits. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 28:1551–1557. doi:10.5713/ajas.15.0287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y-S, Shin D. 2018. Genome-wide association studies associated with Backfat thickness in landrace and Yorkshire pigs. Genomics Inform. 16:59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee Y-S, Son S, Heo J, Shin D. 2021. Detecting the differential genomic variants using cross-population phenotype-associated variant (XP-PAV) of the landrace and yorkshire pigs in Korea. Animal Cells Syst (Seoul). 25:416–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y-S, Son S, Lee H-K, Lee RH, Shin D. 2022. Elucidating breed-specific variants of native pigs in Korea: insights into pig breeds’ genomic characteristics. Animal Cells Syst (Seoul). 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Zhang N, Wang Y-G, George AW, Reverter A, Li Y. 2018. Genomic prediction of breeding values using a subset of SNPs identified by three machine learning methods. Front Genet. 9:237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Gu C, Hostachy S, Sahu S, Wittwer C, Jessen HJ, Fiedler D, Wang H, Shears SB. 2020. Control of XPR1-dependent cellular phosphate efflux by InsP8 is an exemplar for functionally-exclusive inositol pyrophosphate signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 117:3568–3574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Liu X, Bai X, Xiao C, Dong Y. 2020. Different expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in Shandong black cattle and Luxi cattle based on transcriptome analysis. Sci Rep. 10:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu S, Liu Y, Yu X, Li Y, Yang Y, Wei M, Zhou Q, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zheng W. 2020. Prediction of genomic breeding values based on pre-selected SNPs using ssGBLUP, WssGBLUP and BayesB for edwardsiellosis resistance in Japanese flounder. Genet Sel Evol. 52:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura N, Matsumoto T, Hayashi T, Hirose K, Fukawa K, Itou T, Uenishi H, Mikawa S, Awata T. 2013. Genomic regions affecting backfat thickness and cannon bone circumference identified by genome-wide association study in a D uroc pig population. Anim Genet. 44:454–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Z, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhou B, Chen J, Jiang Z, Liu H. 2012. Expression profiles of the insulin-like growth factor system components in liver tissue during embryonic and postnatal growth of erhualian and yorkshire reciprocal cross F1 pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 25:903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson GK. 1991. That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Statistical science. 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer G, Thallman R, Shackelford S, Wheeler T, Koohmaraie M. 2006. A genome scan for loci affecting pork quality in a Duroc–landrace F2 population. Anim Genet. 37:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey JD. 2011. False Discovery Rate. International encyclopedia of statistical science.1:504-508.
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ, Mathur MB. 2019. Some desirable properties of the Bonferroni correction: is the Bonferroni correction really so bad? Am J Epidemiol. 188:617–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher PM, Brown MA, McCarthy MI, Yang J. 2012. Five years of GWAS discovery. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 90:7–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. 2011. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 88:76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar