2,288
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Modeling the adoption of personal health record (PHR) among individual: the effect of health-care technology self-efficacy and gender concern

, &
Article: 1500349 | Received 28 Feb 2018, Accepted 10 Jun 2018, Published online: 24 Jul 2018

References

  • Arnrich B, Mayora O, Bardram J, et al. Pervasive healthcare: paving the way for a pervasive, user centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(1):1–12.
  • Falcao-Reis F, Costa-Pereira A, Correia ME. Access and privacy rights using web security standards to increase patient empowerment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;137:275–285.
  • Rechel B, Doyle Y, Grundy E, et al. How can health systems respond to population ageing? In: World health organization 2009 and world health organization, on behalf of the European observatory on health systems and policies. Vol. 16. Scherfigsvej, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009.
  • Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers for adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(2):121–126.
  • Zurita L, Nohr C. Patient opinion–EHR assessment from the users perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1333–1336.
  • Schneider JH, Marcus E, Del Beccaro MA. Using personal health records to improve the quality of health care for children. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):403–409.
  • Steinwachs DM, Roter D, Skinner EA, et al. A web-based program to empower patients who have schizophrenia to discuss quality of care with mental health providers. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:1296–1302.
  • Liu CF, Tsai YC, Jang FL. Patients’ acceptance towards a web-based personal health record system: an empirical study in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:5191–5208.
  • Noblin AM, Wan TT, Fottler M. Intention to use a personal health record: a theoretical analysis using the technology acceptance model. IJHTM. 2013;14(1/2):73.
  • Jian WS, Shabbir SA, Sood SP, et al. Factors influencing consumer adoption of USB-based personal health records in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(277).
  • Vance B, Tomblin B, Studeny J, et al. Benefits and barriers for adoption of personal health records. Business and Health Administration Association Annual Conference, at the 51st Annual Midwest Business Administration Association International Conference; Chicago, IL. 2015.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425–478.
  • Burkey R, Kenney B, Kott K, et al. Success or failure: human factors in implementing new systems. 2001. Available from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EDU0152.pdf
  • Gartrell K, Trinkoff AM, Storr CL, et al. Testing the electronic personal health record acceptance model by nurses for managing their own health. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6:224–247.
  • Whetstone M, Goldsmith R. Factors influencing intention to use personal health records. Int J Pharm Healthc Marketing. 2009;3(1):8–25.
  • Moon JW, Kim YG. Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Inf Manag. 2001;38(4):217–230.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191e215.
  • Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly. 1995;19(2):189e211.
  • Johnson RD, Marakas GM. Research report: the role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: toward refinement of the model. Inf Syst Res. 2000;11(4):402e417.
  • Rahman MS, Ko M, Warren J, et al. Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: an empirical study. Comput Human Behav. 2016;58:12–24.
  • Anderson CL, Agarwal R. The digitization of healthcare: boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inf Syst Res. 2011;22(3):469e490.
  • Bansal G, Zahedi F, Gefen D. The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decis Support Syst. 2010;49(2):138e150.
  • Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159e172.
  • Hsu MH, Chiu CM. Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decis Support Syst. 2004;38(3):369e381.
  • Stakeholder CI. Perspectives on electronic health record adoption in Taiwan. Manage Rev. 2010;15(1):133–145.
  • Jian WS, Hsu CY, Hao TH, et al. Building a portable data and information interoperability infrastructure framework for a standard Taiwan electronic medical record template. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2007;88:102–111.
  • Gefen D, Straub DW. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly. 1997;21(4):389–400.
  • Chu RJ. How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults: analyses of gender and age differences. Comput Educ. 2010;55(1):255–264.
  • Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer Series in Social Psychology. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editor. Action Control. 1985;2:11–39.
  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
  • Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319–340.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.
  • Kowitlawalul Y, Chan SWC, Pulcini J, et al. Factors influencing nursing students’ acceptance of electronic health records for nursing education (EHRNE) software program. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:189–194.
  • Ortega Egea JM, Roman Gonzalez MV. Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: an extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Comput Human Behav. 2011;27(1):319–332.
  • Lee HH, Chang E. Consumer attitudes toward online mass customization: an application of extended technology acceptance model. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2011;16(2):171–200.
  • Wong CK, Yeung DY, Ho HC, et al. Chinese older adults’ Internet use for health information. J Appl Gerontol. 2012;32(8):1–20.
  • Yun EK, Park H. Consumers’ disease information-seeking behaviour on the Internet in Korea. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(19–20):2860–2868.
  • Hsieh HL, Kuo YM, Wang SR, et al. A study of personal health record user’s behavioral model based on the PMT and UTAUT Integrative Perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:8.
  • Shanko G, Negash S. Mobile healthcare services adoption. Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems; Tel Aviv. 2014.
  • Sun Y, Wang N, Guo X, et al. Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: a comparison and integration of alternative models. J Electron Commerce Res. 2013;14(2):183–200.
  • Assadi V, Hassanein K. Consumer adoption of personal health record systems: a self-determination theory perspective. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:7.
  • Vekiri I, Chronaki A. Gender issues in technology use: perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers Educ. 2008;51(3):1392–1404.
  • Kekkonen-moneta S, Moneta GB. E-learning in Hong Kong: comparing learning outcomes in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory computing course. Br J Educ Technol. 2002;33(4):423–433.
  • Uc E, Mh G, Hy L, et al. Intention to use e-government services in Malaysia: perspective of individual users. International Conference on Informatics Engineering and Information Science ICIEIS 2011: Informatics Engineering and Information Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2011;512–526. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25453-6_43.
  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach. Psychol Bull. 1998;103:411–423.
  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1998.
  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Marking Sci. 1988;16:74–94.
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18:39–50.
  • Hair J, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education International; 2010.
  • MacKinnon DP. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum Press; 2008.
  • Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decis Sci. 2001;32(4):699–719.
  • Durndell A, Hagg Z, Laithwaite H. Computer self-efficacy and gender: a cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania. Pers Individ Dif. 2000;28(6):1037–1044.
  • Durndell A, Hagg Z. Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Comput Human Behav. 2002;18(5):521–535.