Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator

References

• ANSYS. (2013). CFX-15, solver theory. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A. (2015). Turbine tip clearance control using fluidic oscillators (Doctoral dissertion). Retrieved from http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/19426
   Google Scholar
• Cerretelli, C., Wuerz, W., & Gharaibah, E. (2010). Unsteady separation control on wind turbine blades using fluidic oscillators. AIAA Journal, 48(7), 1302–1311. doi: 10.2514/1.42836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Metarivan, T. (2002). A fast Elist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196(4), 879–893.
   Google Scholar
• Ezhilsabareesh, K., Rhee, S. H., & Samad, A. (2017). Shape optimization of a bidirectional impulse turbine via surrogate models. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2017.1330709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, T., Wang, Y., Pang, Y., & Cao, J. (2016). Hull shape optimization for autonomous underwater vehicles using CFD. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 10(1), 599–607. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2016.1224735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R., Haftka, R. T., Shynn, W., Queipo, N. V., & Tucker, K. (2007). Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196(4), 879–893. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, D., & Wygnanski, I. J. (2000). The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 36(7), 487–545. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(00)00008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecklau, M., Wiederhold, O., Zander, V., King, R., Nitsche, W., Huppertz, A., & Swoboda, M. (2011). Active separation control with pulsed jets in a critically loaded compressor cascade. AIAA Journal, 49(8), 1729–1739. doi: 10.2514/1.J050931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain, A., Lee, K.-D., & Kim, K.-Y. (2011). Enhanced multi-objective optimization of a dimpled channel through evolutionary algorithms and multiple surrogate methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 66(6), 742–759. doi: 10.1002/fld.2282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H.-S., & Kim, K.-Y. (2016). Effects of fluidic oscillator geometry on performance. Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, 21(3), 77–88. doi: 10.6112/kscfe.2016.21.3.077
   Google Scholar
• Joen, M. K., Kim, J.-H., Noh, J., Kim, S.-H., Park, H. G., & Woo, S. I. (2005). Design and characterization of a passive recycle micromixer. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 15, 346–350. doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/15/2/014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-M., & Kim, K.-Y. (2006). Shape optimization of three-dimensional channel roughened by angled ribs with RANS analysis of turbulent heat transfer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 49(21–22), 4013–4022. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.03.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Moin, P., & Seifert, A. (2015). LES-based characterization of a suction and oscillatory blowing fluidic oscillator. Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 60, 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K.-Y., & Lee, Y.-M. (2007). Design optimization of internal cooling passage with V-shaped ribs. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 51(11), 1103–1118. doi: 10.1080/10407780601112860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y., Chung, H. S., Cho, D. H., & Shon, M. H. (2007). Flow separation control effects of blowing jet on an airfoil. Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 35(12), 1059–1066. doi: 10.5139/JKSAS.2007.35.12.1059
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M., & Kim, K. Y. (2015). Multi-objective optimization of arc-shaped ribs in the channels of a printed circuit heat exchanger. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 94, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Wang, L., & Liu, Q. (2006). A universal approach for mean mechanical energy losses analysis. Chemical Engineering Science, 61(6), 2085–2088. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. D., & Simpson, T. W. (2005). Use of Kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. AIAA Journal, 43(4), 853–863. doi: 10.2514/1.8650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (2000). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 42(1), 55–61. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter, F. R. (1993). Zonal two equation k-w turbulence models for aerodynamic flows (AIAA paper, 2906).
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nagib, H., Kiedaisch, J., Reinhard, P., & Demanett, B. (2006). Control techniques for flows with large separated regions: A new look at scaling parameters (AIAA paper, 2006(2857)).
   Google Scholar
• Nishri, B., & Wygnanski, I. (2004). Active management of naturally separated flow over a solid surface. Part 1. The forced reattachment process. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 510(7), 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ostermann, F., Woszidlo, R., Nayeri, C., & Paschereit, C. O. (2015, January). Experimental comparison between the flow field of Two common fluidic oscillator design. 53rd AIAA aerospace science meeting, Kissimmee, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Panitz, T., & Wasan, D. T. (1972). Flow attachment to solid surfaces: The Coanda effect. AIChE Journal, 18(1), 51–57. doi: 10.1002/aic.690180111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papila, N., Shyy, W., Griffin, L. W., & Dorney, D. J. (2011). Shape optimization of supersonic turbines using response surface and neural network methods (AIAA paper, 2001(1065)).
   Google Scholar
• Queipo, N. V., Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R., & Tucker, P. K. (2005). Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. (1989). Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science, 4(4), 409–423. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177012413
   Google Scholar
• Scott Collis, S., Joslin, R. D., Seifert, A., & Theofilis, V. (2004). Issues in active flow control: Theory, control, simulation, and experiment. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 40(4), 237– 289. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seele, R., Graff, E., Lin, J., & Wygnanski, I. (2013). Performance Enhancement of a Vertical Tail Model with Sweeping Jet Actuators (AIAA paper, 2013(411)).
   Google Scholar
• Taormina, R., & Chau, K. (2015). Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall-runoff modeling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and extreme learnig machines. Journal of Hydrology, 529(3), 1617–1632. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, V. (2015). High-frequency fluidic oscillator. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 234, 158–167. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2015.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasta, V., Koklu, M., Wygnanski, I., & Fares, E. (2012). Numerical simulation of fluidic actuators for flow control applications (AIAA Paper, 2012(3239)).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-c., Chau, K.-w., Xu, D.-m., & Chen, X.-Y. (2015). Improving forecasting accuracy of annual runoff time series using ARIMA based on EEMD decomposition. Water Resources Management, 29(8), 2655–2675. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-0962-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, R. W. (1960). US Patent No. 3,016,066 Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Woszidlo, R., & Wygnanski, I. (2011). Parameters governing separation control with sweeping jet actuators (Doctoral Dissertion). Retrieved from: http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/203475
   Google Scholar
• Xu, C., & Meng, X. (2013). Performance characteristic curve insensitive to feedback fluidic oscillator configurations. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 189, 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2012.09.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J.-T., Chen, C.-K., Tsai, K.-J., Lin, W.-Z., & Sheen, H.-J. (2007). A novel fluidic oscillator incorporating step-shaped attachment walls. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 135(2), 476–483. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, D., & Moin, P. (2008). Active control of flow separation over an airfoil using synthetic jets. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 24(8), 1349–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Chau, K. (2009). Multilayer ensemble pruning via novel multi-sub-swarm particle swarm optimization. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 15(4), 840–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar