Survey of computational intelligence as basis to big flood management: challenges, research directions and future work

References

• Abdullah, S. S., Malek, M., Abdullah, N. S., & Mustapha, A. (2015). Feedforward backpropagation, genetic algorithm approaches for predicting reference evapotranspiration. Sains Malaysiana, 44(7), 1053–1059. doi: 10.17576/jsm-2015-4407-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abghari, H., Ahmadi, H., Besharat, S., & Rezaverdinejad, V. (2012). Prediction of daily pan evaporation using wavelet neural networks. Water Resources Management, 26(12), 3639–3652. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0096-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamowski, J., & Chan, H. F. (2011). A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 407(1–4), 28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamowski, J., & Sun, K. (2010). Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 390(1–2), 85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adib, A., & Mahmoodi, A. (2017). Prediction of suspended sediment load using ANN GA conjunction model with Markov chain approach at flood conditions. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(1), 447–457. doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0444-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriaenssens, V., De Baets, B., Goethals, P. L., & De Pauw, N. (2004). Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management. Science of the Total Environment, 319(1-3), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00433-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afan, H. A., El-Shafie, A., Yaseen, Z. M., Hameed, M. M., Mohtar, W. H. M. W., & Hussain, A. (2015). ANN based sediment prediction model utilizing different input scenarios. Water Resources Management, 29(4), 1231–1245. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0870-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., & Simonovic, S. (2011). A three-dimensional fuzzy methodology for flood risk analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4(1), 53–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., & Simonovic, S. P. (2006). An intelligent decision support system for management of floods. Water Resources Management, 20(3), 391–410. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-0326-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunkaynak, A. (2009). Sediment load prediction by genetic algorithms. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(9), 928–934. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvisi, S., & Franchini, M. (2011). Fuzzy neural networks for water level and discharge forecasting with uncertainty. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(4), 523–537. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqil, M., Kita, I., Yano, A., & Soichi, N. (2006). Decision support system for flood crisis management using artificial neural network. International Journal of Intelligent Technology, 1(1), 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, M., Chua, L. H. C., Quek, C., & Qin, X. (2017). A fully-online Neuro-Fuzzy model for flow forecasting in basins with limited data. Journal of Hydrology, 545, 424–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astel, A. M., Walna, B., Simeonov, V., & Kurzyca, I. (2008). Multivariate statistics as means of tracking atmospheric pollution trends in western Poland. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 43(3), 313–328. doi: 10.1080/10934520701792852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydogdu, M., & Firat, M. (2015). Estimation of failure rate in water distribution network using fuzzy clustering and LS-SVM methods. Water Resources Management, 29(5), 1575–1590. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0895-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacanli, U. G., Firat, M., & Dikbas, F. (2009). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for drought forecasting. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(8), 1143–1154. doi: 10.1007/s00477-008-0288-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badrzadeh, H., Sarukkalige, R., & Jayawardena, A. (2013). Impact of multi-resolution analysis of artificial intelligence models inputs on multi-step ahead river flow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 507, 75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badrzadeh, H., Sarukkalige, R., & Jayawardena, A. (2015). Hourly runoff forecasting for flood risk management: Application of various computational intelligence models. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1633–1643. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., Chen, Z., Xie, J., & Li, C. (2016). Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using multiscale deep feature learning with hybrid models. Journal of Hydrology, 532, 193–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baliyan, A., Gaurav, K., & Mishra, S. K. (2015). A review of short term load forecasting using artificial neural network models. Procedia Computer Science, 48, 121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.160
   Google Scholar
• Ball, J. E. (2014). Data mining for design flood prediction.
   Google Scholar
• Baltar, A. M., & Fontane, D. G. (2008). Use of multiobjective particle swarm optimization in water resources management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 134(3), 257–265. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(257)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardossy, A., Bogardi, I., & Duckstein, L. (1991). Fuzzy set and probabilistic techniques for health-risk analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 45(3), 241–268. doi: 10.1016/0096-3003(91)90083-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, R. L., & Godt, J. W. (2010). Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA. Landslides, 7(3), 259–272. doi: 10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazartseren, B., Hildebrandt, G., & Holz, K.-P. (2003). Short-term water level prediction using neural networks andneuro-fuzzy approach. Neurocomputing, 55(3-4), 439–450. doi: 10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00388-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belayneh, A., Adamowski, J., Khalil, B., & Ozga-Zielinski, B. (2014). Long-term SPI drought forecasting in the awash river basin in Ethiopia using wavelet neural network and wavelet support vector regression models. Journal of Hydrology, 508, 418–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenguer, M., Sempere-Torres, D., & Hürlimann, M. (2015). Debris-flow forecasting at regional scale by combining susceptibility mapping and radar rainfall. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(3), 587–602. doi: 10.5194/nhess-15-587-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezdek, J. (2013). Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bolshakov, V. (2013). Regression-based Daugava river flood forecasting and monitoring. Information Technology and Management Science, 16(1), 137–142. doi: 10.2478/itms-2013-0021
   Google Scholar
• Bovis, M. J., & Jakob, M. (1999). The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris flow activity. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24(11), 1039–1054. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199910)24:11<1039::AID-ESP29>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannas, B., Fanni, A., See, L., & Sias, G. (2006). Data preprocessing for river flow forecasting using neural networks: Wavelet transforms and data partitioning. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 31(18), 1164–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2006.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana, R., & Niculescu-Mizil, A. (2006). An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. T., Chang, L. C., & Chang, F. J. (2005). Intelligent control for modeling of real-time reservoir operation, part II: Artificial neural network with operating rule curves. Hydrological Processes, 19(7), 1431–1444. doi: 10.1002/hyp.5582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T.-C., & Chao, R.-J. (2006). Application of back-propagation networks in debris flow prediction. Engineering Geology, 85(3-4), 270–280. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F.-J., Chen, P.-A., Lu, Y.-R., Huang, E., & Chang, K.-Y. (2014). Real-time multi-step-ahead water level forecasting by recurrent neural networks for urban flood control. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 836–846. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L.-C., Shen, H.-Y., & Chang, F.-J. (2014). Regional flood inundation nowcast using hybrid SOM and dynamic neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 476–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, S., Pratihar, D. K., & Sarkar, S. C. D. (2012). A comparative study of fuzzy c-means algorithm and entropy-based fuzzy clustering algorithms. Computing and Informatics, 30(4), 701–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, K.-w. (2006). A review on integration of artificial intelligence into water quality modelling. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 52(7), 726–733. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, K., Wu, C., & Li, Y. (2005). Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze river. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10(6), 485–491. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:6(485)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-S., Chen, B. P.-T., Chou, F. N.-F., & Yang, C.-C. (2010). Development and application of a decision group back-propagation neural network for flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 385(1-4), 173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, G. G. (2013). Assessing debris-flow hazard focusing on statistical morpho-fluvial susceptibility models and magnitude-frequency relationships. Application to the central-eastern Pyrenees.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, P.-K., & Willems, P. (2014). Model predictive control combined with genetic algorithms for a river system.
   Google Scholar
• Chidthong, Y., Tanaka, H., & Supharatid, S. (2009). Developing a hybrid multi-model for peak flood forecasting. Hydrological Processes, 23(12), 1725–1738. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chongfu, H. (1996). Fuzzy risk assessment of urban natural hazards. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 83(2), 271–282. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00382-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigizoglu, H. K. (2003). Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of river flows by artificial neural networks. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(3), 349–361. doi: 10.1623/hysj.48.3.349.45288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigizoglu, H. K. (2005). Generalized regression neural network in monthly flow forecasting. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 22(2), 71–81. doi: 10.1080/10286600500126256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigizoglu, H. K., & Kisi, Ö. (2006). Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. Journal of Hydrology, 317(3-4), 221–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corani, G., & Guariso, G. (2005). Coupling fuzzy modeling and neural networks for river flood prediction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 35(3), 382–390. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.843229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordón, O., Herrera, F., Hoffmann, F., & Magdalena, L. (2001). Genetic fuzzy systems: Evolutionary tuning and learning of fuzzy knowledge bases. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Curteanu, S., Dragoi, E.-N., & Dafinescu, V. (2015). Evolutionary Hybrid Configuration Applied to a Polymerization Process Modelling. International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, C., Li, Y., & Huang, G. (2011). A two-stage support-vector-regression optimization model for municipal solid waste management–a case study of Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(12), 3023–3037. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damle, C., & Yalcin, A. (2007). Flood prediction using time series data mining. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2–4), 305–316. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M., Saghafian, B., Nasiri Saleh, F., Farokhnia, A., & Noori, R. (2014). Uncertainty analysis of streamflow drought forecast using artificial neural networks and monte-carlo simulation. International Journal of Climatology, 34(4), 1169–1180. doi: 10.1002/joc.3754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanya, C., & Nagesh Kumar, D. (2009). Data mining for evolution of association rules for droughts and floods in India using climate inputs. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114, D02102. doi:doi: 10.1029/2008JD010485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, Y., Ding, W., Mu, Y., Small, D. L., Islam, S., & Chang, N.-B. (2015). Developing machine learning tools for long-lead heavy precipitation prediction with multi-sensor data. Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, C., Wang, G., Chen, Z., & Yu, Z. (2008). A method of self-adaptive inertia weight for PSO. Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2008 International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Drawid, A., & Gerstein, M. (2000). A Bayesian system integrating expression data with sequence patterns for localizing proteins: Comprehensive application to the yeast genome 1 1Edited by F. Cohen. Journal of Molecular Biology, 301(4), 1059–1075. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, A., Tyrrell, D., Smart, N., Keedwell, E., Djordjevic, S., & Savic, D. (2013). Comparison of machine learning classifier models for bathing water quality exceedances in UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. C. (1973). A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Ratón: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Elbeltagi, E., Hegazy, T., & Grierson, D. (2005). Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(1), 43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslamian, S., & Lavaei, N. (2009). Modelling nitrate pollution of groundwater using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm in an arid zone. International Journal of Water, 5(2), 194–203. doi: 10.1504/IJW.2009.028726
   Google Scholar
• Esogbue, A. O. (1996). Fuzzy sets modeling and optimization for disaster control systems planning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 81(1), 169–183. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00248-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evrendilek, F. (2014). Assessing neural networks with wavelet denoising and regression models in predicting diel dynamics of eddy covariance-measured latent and sensible heat fluxes and evapotranspiration. Neural Computing and Applications, 24(2), 327–337. doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-1240-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faghih, M., Mirzaei, M., Adamowski, J., Lee, J., & El-Shafie, A. (2017). Uncertainty estimation in flood inundation mapping: An application of Non-parametric bootstrapping. River Research and Applications, 33(4), 611–619. doi: 10.1002/rra.3108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faizollahzadeh_Ardabili, S., Mahmoudi, A., Gundoshmian, T. M., & Roshanianfard, A. (2016). Modeling and comparison of fuzzy and on/off controller in a mushroom growing hall. Measurement, 90, 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faizollahzadeh_Ardabili, S., Najafi, B., Ghaebi, H., Shamshirband, S., & Mostafaeipour, A. (2017). A novel enhanced exergy method in analyzing HVAC system using soft computing approaches: A case study on mushroom growing hall. Journal of Building Engineering, 13, 309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel, S. A., Mirfenderesk, H., Blumenstein, M., & Tomlinson, R. (2014). Application of neural network to flood forecasting, an examination of model sensitivity to rainfall assumptions. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Ames, DP, Quinn, NWT, Rizzoli, AE (Eds.), San Diego, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, A., Zhang, X., & Kinley, P. F. (2006). Combined sewer overflow forecasting with feed-forward back-propagation artificial neural network.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. E. (2006). Fuzzy approaches to environmental decisions: Application to air quality. Environmental Science & Policy, 9(1), 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel, L. J., Owens, A. J., & Walsh, M. J. (1966). Intelligent decision making through a simulation of evolution. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 11(4), 253–272. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830110403
   Google Scholar
• Forcael, E., González, V., Orozco, F., Vargas, S., Pantoja, A., & Moscoso, P. (2014). Ant colony optimization model for tsunamis evacuation routes. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(10), 723–737. doi: 10.1111/mice.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, M. N., Krajewski, W. F., & Cuykendall, R. R. (1992). Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 137(1-4), 1–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90046-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, G. (2008). A fuzzy optimization method for multicriteria decision making: An application to reservoir flood control operation. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguli, P., & Reddy, M. J. (2014). Ensemble prediction of regional droughts using climate inputs and the SVM– copulaapproach. Hydrological Processes, 28(19), 4989–5009. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, J. E., Cannon, S. H., & Santi, P. M. (2014). Empirical models for predicting volumes of sediment deposited by debris flows and sediment-laden floods in the transverse ranges of southern California. Engineering Geology, 176, 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Hu, T., Wu, C., Zhang, T., & Lv, Y. (2013). Multi-objective optimization of the proposed multi-reservoir operating policy using improved NSPSO. Water Resources Management, 27(7), 2137–2153. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0280-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guven, A., & Kişi, Ö. (2011). Daily pan evaporation modeling using linear genetic programming technique. Irrigation Science, 29(2), 135–145. doi: 10.1007/s00271-010-0225-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. W., Manning, L. J., & Hankin, R. K. (2011). Bayesian calibration of a flood inundation model using spatial data. Water Resources Research, 47, W05529. doi:doi: 10.1029/2009WR008541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Waltham: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• He, L., Huang, G., & Lu, H. (2008). A simulation-based fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources, 31(12), 1622–1635. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., Xu, Q., Yang, S., & Liao, L. (2014). Reservoir flood control operation based on chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(17-18), 4480–4492. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.02.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., Zhou, J., Kou, P., Lu, N., & Zou, Q. (2011). A fuzzy clustering iterative model using chaotic differential evolution algorithm for evaluating flood disaster. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 10060–10065. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, M., Casper, M., Grundmann, J., & Buchholz, O. (2009). Comparative analysis of model behaviour for flood prediction purposes using self-organizing maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 9(2), 373–392. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-373-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmaidi, K., & Akaichi, J. (2014). Floods trajectories modeling and dynamic relief planning: A bees foraging approach. International Conference on Swarm Intelligence Based Optimization.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, K.-P., Hildebrandt, G., & Weber, L. (2006). Concept for a web-based information system for flood management. Natural Hazards, 38(1-2), 121–140. doi: 10.1007/s11069-005-8605-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, T.-C. R., Lin, C.-W., & Chiang, H. K. (2003). Partial least-squares algorithm for weights initialization of backpropagation network. Neurocomputing, 50, 237–247. doi: 10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00708-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, K. l., Gupta, H. V., & Sorooshian, S. (1995). Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research, 31(10), 2517–2530. doi: 10.1029/95WR01955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z., Zhou, J., Song, L., Lu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Flood disaster loss comprehensive evaluation model based on optimization support vector machine. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3810–3814. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S., Das, A., & Srivastava, D. (1999). Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 125(5), 263–271. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:5(263)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., & Satish, B. (2009). Clustering based short term load forecasting using support vector machines. PowerTech, 2009 IEEE Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., Deng, L., Chen, L., Wu, J., & Li, J. (2009). Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Progress in Natural Science, 19(10), 1419–1425. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinxing, Z., Lixian, W., Baoyuan, X., Shimin, F., & Xilin, W. (2002). A study on the early—warning technique concerning debris flow disasters. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 12(3), 363–370. doi: 10.1007/BF02837558
   Google Scholar
• Kalayathankal, S. J., & Singh, G. S. (2010). A fuzzy soft flood alarm model. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 80(5), 887–893. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, A., Suman, P. K., Giri, B. K., Tiwari, M. K., Chatterjee, C., Nayak, P. C., & Kumar, S. (2013). Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and bootstrap-based neural network for flood forecasting. Neural Computing and Applications, 23(1), 231–246. doi: 10.1007/s00521-013-1344-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karbowski, A., Malinowski, K., & Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, E. (2005). A hybrid analytic/rule-based approach to reservoir system management during flood. Decision Support Systems, 38(4), 599–610. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiviswanathan, K., He, J., Sudheer, K., & Tay, J.-H. (2016). Potential application of wavelet neural network ensemble to forecast streamflow for flood management. Journal of Hydrology, 536, 161–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketabchi, H., & Ataie-Ashtiani, B. (2015). Evolutionary algorithms for the optimal management of coastal groundwater: A comparative study toward future challenges. Journal of Hydrology, 520, 193–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khondoker, M., Dobson, R., Skirrow, C., Simmons, A., & Stahl, D. (2016). A comparison of machine learning methods for classification using simulation with multiple real data examples from mental health studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(5), 1804–1823. doi: 10.1177/0962280213502437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kia, M. B., Pirasteh, S., Pradhan, B., Mahmud, A. R., Sulaiman, W. N. A., & Moradi, A. (2012). An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor river basin, Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(1), 251–264. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-W., & Valdés, J. B. (2003). Nonlinear model for drought forecasting based on a conjunction of wavelet transforms and neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8(6), 319–328. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:6(319)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O. (2008). The potential of different ANN techniques in evapotranspiration modelling. Hydrological Processes, 22(14), 2449–2460. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O. (2015). Streamflow forecasting and estimation using least square support vector regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy embedded fuzzy c-means clustering. Water Resources Management, 29(14), 5109–5127. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-1107-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kişi, Ö. (2009). Neural networks and wavelet conjunction model for intermittent streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(8), 773–782. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., Dailr, A. H., Cimen, M., & Shiri, J. (2012). Suspended sediment modeling using genetic programming and soft computing techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 450–451, 48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., Karimi, S., Shiri, J., Makarynskyy, O., & Yoon, H. (2014). Forecasting sea water levels at Mukho station, South Korea using soft computing techniques. The International Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems, 5(4), 175–188. doi: 10.1260/1759-3131.5.4.175
   Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., Shiri, J., Karimi, S., Shamshirband, S., Motamedi, S., Petković, D., & Hashim, R. (2015). A survey of water level fluctuation predicting in urmia lake using support vector machine with firefly algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 270, 731–743. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.08.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43(1), 59–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00337288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic programming II, automatic discovery of reusable subprograms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreinovich, V., Nguyen, H. T., & Yam, Y. (1999). Fuzzy systems are universal approximators for a smooth function and its derivatives.
   Google Scholar
• Kruppa, J., Liu, Y., Biau, G., Kohler, M., König, I. R., Malley, J. D., & Ziegler, A. (2014). Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: Theory. Biometrical Journal, 56(4), 534–563. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201300068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., Raghuwanshi, N., Singh, R., Wallender, W., & Pruitt, W. (2002). Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 128(4), 224–233. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:4(224)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D. N., & Reddy, M. J. (2006). Ant colony optimization for multi-purpose reservoir operation. Water Resources Management, 20(6), 879–898. doi: 10.1007/s11269-005-9012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafdani, E. K., Nia, A. M., & Ahmadi, A. (2013). Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Journal of Hydrology, 478, 50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Chen, X., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Wu, X., & Zhao, S. (2015). A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory. Natural Hazards, 77(2), 1243–1259. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-1645-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-W., & Chen, S.-M. (2008). Fuzzy risk analysis based on fuzzy numbers with different shapes and different deviations. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2763–2771. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-J., & Lee, K. J. (2006). Application of Bayesian network to the probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear waste disposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(5), 515–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon, A. S., Kanashiro, E. A., Valverde, R., & Sridhar, V. (2014). Dynamic framework for intelligent control of river flooding: Case study. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(2), 258–268. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. (2013). Fuzzy approach to analysis of flood risk based on variable fuzzy sets and improved information diffusion methods. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13(2), 239–249. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-239-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Zhou, J., Liu, D., & Jiang, X. (2012). Research on flood risk analysis and evaluation method based on variable fuzzy sets and information diffusion. Safety Science, 50(5), 1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-W., Chen, C.-W., & Peng, C.-Y. (2012). Potential hazard analysis and risk assessment of debris flow by fuzzy modeling. Natural Hazards, 64(1), 273–282. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0236-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, G.-F., Wang, T.-C., & Chen, L.-H. (2016). A forecasting approach combining self-organizing map with support vector regression for reservoir inflow during typhoon periods. Advances in Meteorology, 2016, Article ID 7575126. doi: 10.1155/2016/7575126.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Lu, J. (2014). Support vector machine―an alternative to artificial neuron network for water quality forecasting in an agricultural nonpoint source polluted river? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(18), 11036–11053. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3046-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Pender, G. (2015). A flood inundation modelling using v-support vector machine regression model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 46, 223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q.-J., Shi, Z.-H., Fang, N.-F., Zhu, H.-D., & Ai, L. (2013). Modeling the daily suspended sediment concentration in a hyperconcentrated river on the loess plateau, China, using the wavelet–ANN approach. Geomorphology, 186, 181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobbrecht, A. H., & Solomatine, D. P. (2002). Machine learning in real-time control of water systems. Urban Water, 4(3), 283–289. doi: 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00023-7
   Google Scholar
• Lohani, A. K., Goel, N., & Bhatia, K. (2014). Improving real time flood forecasting using fuzzy inference system. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 25–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londhe, S. N., & Dixit, P. R. (2012). Genetic programming: a novel computing approach in modeling water flows Genetic Programming-New Approaches and Successful Applications: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, J., Qi, Y., Xie, J., & Zhang, X. (2015). A hybrid multi-objective PSO–EDA algorithm for reservoir flood control operation. Applied Soft Computing, 34, 526–538. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marée, R., Geurts, P., Visimberga, G., Piater, J., & Wehenkel, L. (2004). A comparison of generic machine learning algorithms for image classification. In Research and development in intelligent systems XX (pp. 169–182). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel, J. M. (1995). Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: A tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83(3), 345–377. doi: 10.1109/5.364485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2008a). Flood frequency hydrology: 1. Temporal, spatial, and causal expansion of information. Water Resources Research, 44(8), W08432. doi:10.1029/2007WR006744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2008b). Flood frequency hydrology: 2. Combining data evidence. Water Resources Research, 44(8), W08433. doi: 10.1029/2007WR006745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., Kreibich, H., & Lall, U. (2013). Multi-variate flood damage assessment: A tree-based data-mining approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13(1), 53–64. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-53-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., & Thieken, A. (2010). Review article” assessment of economic flood damage”. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10(8), 1697–1724. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minglei, R., Bende, W., Liang, Q., & Guangtao, F. (2010). Classified real-time flood forecasting by coupling fuzzy clustering and neural network. International Journal of Sediment Research, 25(2), 134–148. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6279(10)60033-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A., Desai, V., & Singh, V. (2007). Drought forecasting using a hybrid stochastic and neural network model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12(6), 626–638. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:6(626)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, K. B., & Weber, G. G. (1990). Use of fuzzy set theory for level-I studies in probabilistic risk assessment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 37(2), 139–160. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(90)90038-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, S., Jha, M. K., Kumar, A., & Panda, D. (2013). Comparative evaluation of numerical model and artificial neural network for simulating groundwater flow in Kathajodi–Surua inter-basin of Odisha, India. Journal of Hydrology, 495, 38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez, R., & Tung, M. M. (2008). Particle swarm optimization applied to the design of water supply systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56(3), 769–776. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez-García, R., & Herrera, M. (2014). Water distribution system computer-aided design by agent swarm optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(6), 433–448. doi: 10.1111/mice.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavi, V., Vafakhah, M., Shirmohammadi, B., & Behnia, N. (2013). A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods. Water Resources Management, 27(5), 1301–1321. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0239-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwale, F., Adeloye, A., & Rustum, R. (2014). Application of self-organising maps and multi-layer perceptron-artificial neural networks for streamflow and water level forecasting in data-poor catchments: The case of the lower Shire floodplain, Malawi. Hydrology Research, 45(6), 838–854. doi: 10.2166/nh.2014.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. (2013). Game theory. Cambridge: Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, H., Watanabe, K., & Hirano, M. (2002). Prediction of sediment load concentration in rivers using artificial neural network model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(6), 588–595. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:6(588)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najah, A. A., El-Shafie, A., Karim, O. A., & Jaafar, O. (2012). Water quality prediction model utilizing integrated wavelet-ANFIS model with cross-validation. Neural Computing and Applications, 21(5), 833–841. doi: 10.1007/s00521-010-0486-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano, G., See, L., Calvo, B., Savi, F., & Heppenstall, A. (2010). A conceptual and neural network model for real-time flood forecasting of the tiber river in Rome. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 35(3-5), 187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, P., Sudheer, K., & Ramasastri, K. (2005). Fuzzy computing based rainfall–runoff model for real time flood forecasting. Hydrological Processes, 19(4), 955–968. doi: 10.1002/hyp.5553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkoana, R. (2011). Artificial neural network modelling of flood prediction and early warning. (Master Degree). University of the Free State, Bloemfontein Google Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., & Andalib, G. (2015). Daily and monthly suspended sediment load predictions using wavelet based artificial intelligence approaches. Journal of Mountain Science, 12(1), 85–100. doi: 10.1007/s11629-014-3121-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., Baghanam, A. H., Adamowski, J., & Kisi, O. (2014). Applications of hybrid wavelet–artificial intelligence models in hydrology: A review. Journal of Hydrology, 514, 358–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., Komasi, M., & Alami, M. T. (2012). Hybrid wavelet–genetic programming approach to optimize ANN modeling of rainfall–runoff process. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(6), 724–741. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osanai, N., Shimizu, T., Kuramoto, K., Kojima, S., & Noro, T. (2010). Japanese early-warning for debris flows and slope failures using rainfall indices with radial basis function network. Landslides, 7(3), 325–338. doi: 10.1007/s10346-010-0229-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappenberger, F., Frodsham, K., Beven, K., Romanowicz, R., & Matgen, P. (2007). Fuzzy set approach to calibrating distributed flood inundation models using remote sensing observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 11(2), 739–752. doi: 10.5194/hess-11-739-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partal, T., & Cigizoglu, H. K. (2008). Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data using wavelet–neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 358(3-4), 317–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partal, T., & Kişi, Ö. (2007). Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 342(1-2), 199–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patcha, A., & Park, J.-M. (2007). An overview of anomaly detection techniques: Existing solutions and latest technological trends. Computer Networks, 51(12), 3448–3470. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patki, V. K., Shrihari, S., Manu, B., & Deka, P. C. (2015). Fuzzy system modeling for forecasting water quality index in municipal distribution system. Urban Water Journal, 12(2), 89–110. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2013.820333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PielkeJr, R. A., & Downton, M. W. (2000). Precipitation and damaging floods: Trends in the United States, 1932–97. Journal of Climate, 13(20), 3625–3637. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3625:PADFTI>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyayt, A. L., Mokhov, I. I., Lang, B., Krzhizhanovskaya, V. V., & Meijer, R. J. (2011). Machine learning methods for environmental monitoring and flood protection. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 78, 118–123.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, H., Zhou, J., Lu, Y., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Multi-objective cultured differential evolution for generating optimal trade-offs in reservoir flood control operation. Water Resources Management, 24(11), 2611–2632. doi: 10.1007/s11269-009-9570-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, A., & Akif, A. (2015). Optimal artificial neural network modeling of sedimentation yield and runoff in high flow season of Indus river at Besham Qila for Terbela dam. Int J Sci Res, 4, 479–483.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, M. J., & Kumar, D. N. (2006). Optimal reservoir operation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Water Resources Management, 20(6), 861–878. doi: 10.1007/s11269-005-9011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, M. J., & Kumar, D. N. (2007). Optimal reservoir operation for irrigation of multiple crops using elitist-mutated particle swarm optimization. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52(4), 686–701. doi: 10.1623/hysj.52.4.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, M. J., & Nagesh Kumar, D. (2007). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for generating optimal trade-offs in reservoir operation. Hydrological Processes, 21(21), 2897–2909. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 89–107. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezoug, M., Meouche, R., Hamzaoui, R., & Feng, Z.-Q. (2013). Using the fast multi-objective genetic algorithm to improve the urban flood modeling. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(3), 341–344. doi: 10.7763/IJET.2013.V5.571
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. L., & Dowla, F. U. (1994). Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling. Water Resources Research, 30(2), 457–481. doi: 10.1029/93WR01494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. nature, 323(6088), 533–536. doi: 10.1038/323533a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabzi, H. Z., Humberson, D., Abudu, S., & King, J. P. (2016). Optimization of adaptive fuzzy logic controller using novel combined evolutionary algorithms, and its application in Diez Lagos flood controlling system, southern New Mexico. Expert Systems with Applications, 43, 154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahay, R. R., & Srivastava, A. (2014). Predicting monsoon floods in rivers embedding wavelet transform, genetic algorithm and neural network. Water Resources Management, 28(2), 301–317. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0446-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sättele, M., Bründl, M., & Straub, D. (2015). Reliability and effectiveness of early warning systems for natural hazards: Concept and application to debris flow warning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 142, 192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnebele, E. (2013). Improving remote sensing flood assessment using volunteered geographical data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(3), 669–677. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-669-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwefel, H.-P. (1981). Numerical optimization of computer models. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seal, V., Raha, A., Maity, S., Mitra, S. K., Mukherjee, A., & Naskar, M. K. (2012). A real time multivariate robust regression based flood prediction model using polynomial approximation for wireless sensor network based flood forecasting systems. International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• See, L., & Openshaw, S. (1999). Applying soft computing approaches to river level forecasting. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 44(5), 763–778. doi: 10.1080/02626669909492272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal, V., Sahay, R. R., & Chatterjee, C. (2014). Effect of utilization of discrete wavelet components on flood forecasting performance of wavelet based ANFIS models. Water Resources Management, 28(6), 1733–1749. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0584-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sertel, E., Cigizoglu, H., & Sanli, D. (2008). Estimating daily mean sea level heights using artificial neural networks. Journal of Coastal Research, 243, 727–734. doi: 10.2112/06-742.1
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H.-S., & Salas, J. D. (2000). Regional drought analysis based on neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(2), 145–155. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(145)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiri, J., Dierickx, W., Baba, A. P.-A., Neamati, S., & Ghorbani, M. (2011). Estimating daily pan evaporation from climatic data of the state of Illinois, USA using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial neural network (ANN). Hydrology Research, 42(6), 491–502. doi: 10.2166/nh.2011.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiri, J., Nazemi, A. H., Sadraddini, A. A., Landeras, G., Kisi, O., Fard, A. F., & Marti, P. (2013). Global cross-station assessment of neuro-fuzzy models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shouyu, C., & Yu, G. (2006). Variable fuzzy sets and its application in comprehensive risk evaluation for flood-control engineering system. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 5(2), 153–162. doi: 10.1007/s10700-006-7333-y
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G., Kandasamy, J., Shon, H., & Cho, J. (2011). Measuring treatment effectiveness of urban wetland using hybrid water quality—artificial neural network (ANN) model. Desalination and Water Treatment, 32(1–3), 284–290. doi: 10.5004/dwt.2011.2712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivapragasam, C., Maheswaran, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2008). Genetic programming approach for flood routing in natural channels. Hydrological Processes, 22(5), 623–628. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomatine, D. P., & Price, R. K. (2004). Innovative approaches to flood forecasting using data driven and hybrid modelling. In Hydroinformatics: (In 2 Volumes, with CD-ROM) (pp. 1639–1646). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Song, S., & Singh, V. P. (2010). Frequency analysis of droughts using the Plackett copula and parameter estimation by genetic algorithm. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24(5), 783–805. doi: 10.1007/s00477-010-0364-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359. doi: 10.1023/A:1008202821328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudheer, K., & Jain, A. (2004). Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrological Processes, 18(4), 833–844. doi: 10.1002/hyp.5517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabari, H., Martinez, C., Ezani, A., & Talaee, P. H. (2013). Applicability of support vector machines and adaptive neurofuzzy inference system for modeling potato crop evapotranspiration. Irrigation Science, 31(4), 575–588. doi: 10.1007/s00271-012-0332-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmasebi, P., & Hezarkhani, A. (2012). A hybrid neural networks-fuzzy logic-genetic algorithm for grade estimation. Computers & Geosciences, 42, 18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayfur, G., Moramarco, T., & Singh, V. P. (2007). Predicting and forecasting flow discharge at sites receiving significant lateral inflow. Hydrological Processes, 21(14), 1848–1859. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayyab, M., Zhou, J., Zeng, X., & Adnan, R. (2016). Discharge forecasting by applying artificial neural networks at the Jinsha river basin, China. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(9), 108–127.
   Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2013). Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 504, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2014). Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 332–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2015). Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29(4), 1149–1165. doi: 10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., Mansor, S., & Ahmad, N. (2015). Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena, 125, 91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezel, G., & Buyukyildiz, M. (2016). Monthly evaporation forecasting using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 124(1-2), 69–80. doi: 10.1007/s00704-015-1392-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, M. K., & Chatterjee, C. (2010). Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). Journal of Hydrology, 382(1-4), 20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, M. E., & Yurdusev, M. A. (2014). Predicting monthly river flows by genetic fuzzy systems. Water Resources Management, 28(13), 4685–4697. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0767-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, A., Merz, R., Salinas, J. L., & Blöschl, G. (2013). Flood frequency hydrology: 3. A Bayesian analysis. Water Resources Research, 49(2), 675–692. doi: 10.1029/2011WR010782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, K., Riggelsen, C., Merz, B., Kreibich, H., & Scherbaum, F. (2012). Flood damage and influencing factors: A Bayesian network perspective. 6th European workshop on probabilistic graphical models (PGM 2012), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Huang, G., & Baetz, B. W. (2015). An inexact probabilistic–possibilistic optimization framework for flood management in a hybrid uncertain environment. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(4), 897–908. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2333094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Huang, G. H., & Yang, B. (2012). An interval-valued fuzzy-stochastic programming approach and its application to municipal solid waste management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 29(1), 24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Liu, Z. (2013). Spatio-temporal patterns of cropland conversion in response to the “grain for green project” in China’s loess hilly region of Yanchuan county. Remote Sensing, 5(11), 5642–5661. doi: 10.3390/rs5115642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmerdam, J. M., & Jacobs, T. L. (1994). Fuzzy set approach to routing and siting hazardous waste operations. Information Sciences-Applications, 2(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/1069-0115(94)90002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, C.-C. (2012). Wavelet kernel support vector machines forecasting techniques: Case study on water-level predictions during typhoons. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5189–5199. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyns, D., Parunak, H. V. D., Michel, F., Holvoet, T., & Ferber, J. (2004). Environments for multiagent systems state-of-the-art and research challenges. International Workshop on Environments for Multi-Agent Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Wieprecht, S., Tolossa, H. G., & Yang, C. T. (2013). A neuro-fuzzy-based modelling approach for sediment transport computation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(3), 587–599. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2012.755264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, M., Gouldby, B., Kapelan, Z., & Hames, D. (2014). Multiobjective optimization for improved management of flood risk. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(2), 201–215. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., & Chau, K.-W. (2006). Evaluation of several algorithms in forecasting flood. International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Chau, K., & Li, Y. (2009). Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques. Water Resources Research, 45(8), 111–116. doi: 10.1029/2007WR006737
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M.-C., & Lin, G.-F. (2015). An hourly streamflow forecasting model coupled with an enforced learning strategy. Water, 7(11), 5876–5895. doi: 10.3390/w7115876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Zhao, L. (2009). Load forecasting model based on amendment of mamdani fuzzy system. Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2009. WiCom’09. 5th International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Yaseen, Z. M., El-Shafie, A., Jaafar, O., Afan, H. A., & Sayl, K. N. (2015). Artificial intelligence based models for stream-flow forecasting: 2000–2015. Journal of Hydrology, 530, 829–844. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi, J., & Neyshabouri, S. S. (2014). Adaptive surrogate modeling for optimization of flood control detention dams. Environmental Modelling & Software, 61, 106–120. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, C.-F., Wang, J., Yeh, H.-F., & Lee, C.-H. (2015). Spatial and temporal streamflow trends in northern Taiwan. Water, 7(2), 634–651. doi: 10.3390/w7020634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonaba, H., Anctil, F., & Fortin, V. (2010). Comparing sigmoid transfer functions for neural network multistep ahead streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15(4), 275–283. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P.-S., Chen, S.-T., & Chang, I.-F. (2006). Support vector regression for real-time flood stage forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 328(3-4), 704–716. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1994). Soft computing and fuzzy logic. IEEE Software, 11(6), 48–56. doi: 10.1109/52.329401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1999). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 100, 9–34. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)80004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zealand, C. M., Burn, D. H., & Simonovic, S. P. (1999). Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 214(1-4), 32–48. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00242-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Zhang, L., & Du, B. (2016). Deep learning for remote sensing data: A technical tutorial on the state of the art. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 4(2), 22–40. doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2016.2540798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Coatrieux, J.-L., Bousse, A., Shu, H., & Luo, L. (2007). A Bayesian MAP-EM algorithm for PET image reconstruction using wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 54(5), 1660–1669. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2007.901200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Cui, M. (2008). Neural network-based early warning system for debris flow disaster in the Three Gorges Reservoir region. Natural Computation, 2008. ICNC’08. Fourth International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, Q., Zhou, J., Zhou, C., Guo, J., Deng, W., Yang, M., & Liao, L. (2012). Fuzzy risk analysis of flood disasters based on diffused-interior-outer-set model. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(6), 6213–6220. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurada, J. M. (1992). Introduction to artificial neural systems. West St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar