Assessment of RANS turbulence models and Zwart cavitation model empirical coefficients for the simulation of unsteady cloud cavitation

References

• Akbarian, E., Najafi, B., Jafari, M., Ardabili, S. F., Shamshirband, S., & Chau, K.-W. (2018). Experimental and computational fluid dynamics-based numerical simulation of using natural gas in a dual-fueled diesel engine. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12(1), 517–534. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2018.1472670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSYS. (2015). Release 16.2, help system, CFX theory guide. Pittsburgh: ANSYS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ayli, E., Celebioglu, K., & Aradag, S. (2016). Determination and generalization of the effects of design parameters on Francis turbine runner performance. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 10(1), 545–564. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2016.1213664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensow, R. E. (2011, June). Simulation of the unsteady cavitation on the Delft Twist11 foil using RANS, DES and LES. In Second international symposium on marine propulsors, Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bilus, I., Morgut, M., & Nobile, E. (2013). Simulation of sheet and cloud cavitation with homogenous transport models. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 12(2), 94–106. doi: 10.2507/IJSIMM12(2)3.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennen, C. E. (1995). Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budich, B., Neuner, S., Schmidt, S. J., & Adams, N. A. (2015). Numerical investigation of shedding partial cavities over a sharp wedge. In Journal of physics: Conference series (Vol. 656, No. 1, p. 012122). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Hu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2019). Structure optimization of submerged water jet cavitating nozzle with a hybrid algorithm. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 591–608. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2019.1628106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couty, P. (2002). Physical investigation of cavitation vortex collapse (No. THESIS). EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, P. (1993). Etude de la dynamique d’une poche de cavitation partielle en vue de la prédiction de l’érosion dans les turbomachines hydrauliques (No. THESIS). EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Escaler, X., Farhat, M., Egusquiza, E., & Avellan, F. (2007). Dynamics and intensity of erosive partial cavitation. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 129(7), 886–893. doi: 10.1115/1.2742748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh, H., Mäkiharju, S., & Ceccio, S. (2016). Bubbly shock propagation as a mechanism for sheet-to-cloud transition of partial cavities. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 802, 37–78. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2016.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahramani, E., Arabnejad, M. H., & Bensow, R. E. (2019). A comparative study between numerical methods in simulation of cavitating bubbles. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 111, 339–359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghalandari, M., Koohshahi, E. M., Mohamadian, F., Shamshirband, S., & Chau, K.-W. (2019). Numerical simulation of nanofluid flow inside a root canal. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 254–264. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2019.1578696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalvès, E. (2011). Numerical study of unsteady turbulent cavitating flows. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 30(1), 26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, E., & Patella, R. F. (2009). Numerical simulation of cavitating flows with homogeneous models. Computers & Fluids, 38(9), 1682–1696. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalan, S., & Katz, J. (2000). Flow structure and modeling issues in the closure region of attached cavitation. Physics of Fluids, 12(4), 895–911. doi: 10.1063/1.870344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hejranfar, K., Ezzatneshan, E., & Fattah-Hesari, K. (2015). A comparative study of two cavitation modeling strategies for simulation of inviscid cavitating flows. Ocean Engineering, 108, 257–275. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, B. C., Ghia, U., Roache, P. J., Freitas, C. J., & Coloman, H. (2008). Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130, 078001-1–078001-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-e. (2009). A numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil. In Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on cavitation CAV2009 August 17–22, 2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kinzel, M., Lindau, J., Peltier, L., Kunz, R., & Sankaran, V. (2007, November). Detached-eddy simulations for cavitating flows. In 18th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, p. 4098.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, R. F., Boger, D. A., Stinebring, D. R., Chyczewski, T. S., Lindau, J. W., Gibeling, H. J., … Govindan, T. R. (2000). A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Computers & Fluids, 29(8), 849–875. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7930(99)00039-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, K. V., Cervone, A., & Hickey, J. P. (2017). Turbulence modeling of cavitating flows in liquid rocket turbopumps. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 139(1), 011301. doi: 10.1115/1.4034096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgut, M., Nobile, E., & Biluš, I. (2011). Comparison of mass transfer models for the numerical prediction of sheet cavitation around a hydrofoil. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 37(6), 620–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A., Shamshirband, S., Salwana, E., Chau, K.-W., & Tah, J. (2019). Prediction of multi-inputs bubble column reactor using a novel hybrid model of computational fluid dynamics and machine learning. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 482–492. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2019.1613448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, B., Bao-Jie He, B.-J., Zhao, D.-X., & Chau, K.-W. (2017). Numerical simulation of the effects of building dimensional variation on wind pressure distribution. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 11(1), 293–309. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2017.1281845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, C., Salvatore, V., & Ciucci, A. (2003, November). Effects of speed of sound variation on unsteady cavitating flows by using a barotropic model. In 5th international symposium on cavitation CAV2003, Osaka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Pendar, M. R., & Roohi, E. (2016). Investigation of cavitation around 3D hemispherical head-form body and conical cavitators using different turbulence and cavitation models. Ocean Engineering, 112, 287–306. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramezanizadeh, M., Nazari, M. A., Ahmadi, M. H., & Chau, K.-W. (2019). Experimental and numerical analysis of a nanofluidic thermosyphon heat exchanger. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 40–47. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2018.1518272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reboud, J. L., Stutz, B., & Coutier, O. (1998, April). Two phase flow structure of cavitation: Experiment and modeling of unsteady effects. In 3rd international symposium on cavitation CAV1998, Grenoble, France (Vol. 26).
   Google Scholar
• Roohi, E., Pendar, M. R., & Rahimi, A. (2016). Simulation of three-dimensional cavitation behind a disk using various turbulence and mass transfer models. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(1), 542–564. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, H., & McNown, J. S. (1948). Cavitation and pressure distribution, head forms at zero angel of yaw, studies in engineering. Bulletin, 32.
   Google Scholar
• Schenke, S., Melissaris, T., & van Terwisga, T. J. C. (2019). On the relevance of kinematics for cavitation implosion loads. Physics of Fluids, 31(5), 052102. doi: 10.1063/1.5092711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenke, S., & van Terwisga, T. J. (2019). An energy conservative method to predict the erosive aggressiveness of collapsing cavitating structures and cavitating flows from numerical simulations. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 111, 200–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnerr, G. H., & Sauer, J. (2001, May). Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. In Fourth international conference on multiphase flow (Vol. 1). ICMF New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlar, M., Ji, B., Kratky, T., Rebok, T., & Huzlik, R. (2016). Numerical and experimental investigation of three-dimensional cavitating flow around the straight NACA2412 hydrofoil. Ocean Engineering, 123, 357–382. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senocak, I., & Shyy, W. (2002, January). Evaluations of cavitation models for Navier-Stokes computations. In ASME 2002 joint US-European fluids engineering division conference (pp. 395–401). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., & Dimotakis, P. E. (1989, August). The influence of surface cavitation on hydrodynamic forces. In American towing tank conference, 22nd.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, A. K., Athavale, M. M., Li, H., & Jiang, Y. (2002). Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(3), 617–624. doi: 10.1115/1.1486223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C. C., & Wang, L. J. (2014). Investigations of empirical coefficients of cavitation and turbulence model through steady and unsteady turbulent cavitating flows. Computers & Fluids, 103, 262–274. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utturkar, Y., Wu, J., Wang, G., & Shyy, W. (2005). Recent progress in modeling of cryogenic cavitation for liquid rocket propulsion. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41(7), 558–608. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidyanathan, R., Senocak, I., Wu, J., & Shyy, W. (2003). Sensitivity evaluation of a transport-based turbulent cavitation model. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 125(3), 447–458. doi: 10.1115/1.1566048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijsbergen, M., Foeth, E. J., Fitzsimmons, P., & Boorsma, A. (2012). High-speed video observations and acoustic-impact measurements on a NACA0015 Foil. In Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on cavitation, CAV2012, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Senocak, I., Shyy, W., Ikohagi, T., & Cao, S. (2001). Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 37(6), 551–581. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00014-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, C., Song, J., & Liu, M. (2019). Comparison of compressible and incompressible numerical methods in simulation of a cavitating jet through a poppet valve. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 67–90. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2018.1552202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, P. J., Gerber, A. G., & Belamri, T. (2004, May). A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics. In Fifth international conference on multiphase flow (Vol. 152), Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar