Relationship between sucrose concentration and bacteria proportion in a multispecies biofilm

References

• Marsh PD. Controlling the oral biofilm with antimicrobials. J Dent. 2010;38(Suppl 1):S11–S15.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community-implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 2006;6(Suppl 1):S14.
   Google Scholar
• Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50(4):353–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowen WH, Koo H. Biology of Streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms. Caries Res. 2011;45(1):69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sendamangalam V, Choi OK, Kim D, et al. The anti-biofouling effect of polyphenols against Streptococcus mutans. Biofouling. 2011;27(1):13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefti A, Schmid R. Effect on caries incidence in rats of increasing dietary sucrose levels. Caries Res. 1979;13(5):298–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Gupta N, Pawar AP, et al. Role of sugar and sugar substitutes in dental caries: a review. ISRN Dent. 2013;2013:519421.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Garrido N, Lozano C, Giacaman RA. Frequency of sucrose exposure on the cariogenicity of a biofilm-caries model. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(3):345–350.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi M. Epidemiological study on dental caries in Japanese children, before, during and after World War II. Int Dent J. 1961;11(6):443–457.
   Google Scholar
• Koike H. Studies on caries incidence in the first molar in relation to amount of sugar consumption on primary school children in Kyoto City. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1962;3(1):44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bernabé E, Vehkalahti MM, Sheiham A, et al. The shape of the dose-response relationship between sugars and caries in adults. J Dent Res. 2016;95(2):167–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai JN, Jung JE, Dang MH, et al. Functional relationship between sucrose and a cariogenic biofilm formation. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai JN, Jung JE, Lee MH, et al. Sucrose challenges to Streptococcus mutans biofilms and the curve fitting for the biofilm changes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94(7):fiy091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti YW, Bertolini MM, Da Silva WJ, et al. A three-species biofilm model for the evaluation of enamel and dentin demineralization. Biofouling. 2014;30(5):579–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit S, Cai JN, Song KY, et al. Identification of anti-biofilm components in Withania somnifera and their effect on virulence of Streptococcus mutans biofilms. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;119(2):571–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold OG, Jordan HV, Van Houte J. A selective medium for Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol. 1973;18(11):1357–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zylber LJ, Jordan HV. Development of a selective medium for detection and enumeration of Actinomyces viscosus and Actinomyces naeslundii in dental plaque. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15(2):253–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon JG, Pandit S, Xiao J, et al. Influences of trans-trans farnesol, a membrane-targeting sesquiterpenoid, on Streptococcus mutans physiology and survival within mixed-species oral biofilms. Int J Oral Sci. 2011;3(2):98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli W, Buckley D, Marquis RE. Weak acid effects and fluoride inhibition of glycolysis by Streptococcus mutans GS-5. Can J Microbiol. 1995;41(9):785–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurnheer T, Gmür R, Guggenheim B. Multiplex FISH analysis of a six-species bacterial biofilm. J Microbiol Methods. 2004;56(1):37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster JS, Kolenbrander PE. Development of a multispecies oral bacterial community in a saliva-conditioned flow cell. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(7):4340–4348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug B, Rodler C, Koller M, et al. Oral biofilm analysis of palatal expanders by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Vis Exp. 2011;20(56):2967.
   Google Scholar
• Paster BJ, Bartoszyk IM, Dewhirst FE. Identification of oral streptococci using PCR-based, reverse-capture, checkerboard hybridization. Meth Cell Sci. 1998;20(1):223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Jung JE, Cai JN, Cho SD, et al. Influence of fluoride on the bacterial composition of a dual-species biofilm composed of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus oralis. Biofouling. 2016;32(9):1079–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, et al. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology. 2000;146(10):2395–2407.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribeiro CC, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA, et al. Effect of starch on the cariogenic potential of sucrose. Br J Nutr. 2005;94(1):44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aires CP, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA, et al. Effect of sucrose concentration on dental biofilm formed in situ and on enamel demineralization. Caries Res. 2006;40(1):28–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ccahuana-Vásquez RA, Tabchoury CP, Tenuta LM, et al. Effect of frequency of sucrose exposure on dental biofilm composition and enamel demineralization in the presence of fluoride. Caries Res. 2007;41(1):9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecharki GD, Cury JA, Paes Leme AF, et al. Effect of sucrose containing iron (II) on dental biofilm and enamel demineralization in situ. Caries Res. 2005;39(2):123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirife J, Herszage L, Joseph A, et al. In vitro study of bacterial growth inhibition in concentrated sugar solutions: microbiological basis for the use of sugar in treating infected wounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983;23(5):766–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum RJ, Brocklehurst TF, Wilson DR, et al. The effects of cell immobilization, pH and sucrose on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A at 10°C. Food Microbiol. 2003;20(1):97–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frickmann H, Zautner AE, Moter A, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the microbiological diagnostic routine laboratory: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017;43(3):263–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Hu T, Zhang J, et al. Characterization of the Actinomyces naeslundii ureolysis and its role in bacterial aciduricity and capacity to modulate pH homeostasis. Microbiol Res. 2006;161(4):304–310.
   Google Scholar