Ratiometric imaging of extracellular pH in Streptococcus mutans biofilms exposed to different flow velocities and saliva film thicknesses

References

• Schlafer S, Meyer RL. Confocal microscopy imaging og the biofilm matrix. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;138:50–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Klein MI, Falsetta ML, et al. The exopolysaccharide matrix modulates the interaction between 3D architecture and virulence of a mixed-species oral biofilm. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(4):e1002623. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Raarup MK, Meyer RL, et al. pH landscapes in a novel five-species model of early dental biofilm. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(9):e25299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Garcia JE, Greve M, et al. Ratiometric imaging of extracellular pH in bacterial biofilms with C-SNARF-4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(4):1267–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutler M, Heisterkamp IM, Piltz B, et al. Beer D de. Microscopic oxygen imaging based on fluorescein bleaching efficiency measurements. Microsc Res Tech. 2014;77(5):341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston AJ, Edgar WM. Developments in dental plaque pH modelling. J Dent. 2005;33(3):209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang G, Liu Y, Kim D, et al. Simultaneous spatiotemporal mapping of in situ pH and bacterial activity within an intact 3D microcolony structure. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):32841.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Hara AT, Kim D, et al. Biofilm three-dimensional architecture influences in situ pH distribution pattern on the human enamel surface. Int J Oral Sci. 2017;9(2):74–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dige I, Baelum V, Nyvad B, et al. Monitoring of extracellular pH in young dental biofilms grown in vivo in the presence and absence of sucrose. J Oral Microbiol. 2016;8(1):30390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Barraza JP, Arthur RA, et al. Spatial mapping of polymicrobial communities reveals a precise biogeography associated with human dental caries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(22):12375–12386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubala E, Strzelecka P, Grzegocka M, et al. A review of selected studies that determine the physical and chemical properties of saliva in the field of dental treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018: 6572381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes C, Watanabe S, Biglow-Lecomte P, et al. Estimation of the velocity of the salivary film at some different locations in the mouth. J Dent Res. 1989;68(11):1479–1482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecomte P, Dawes C. The influence of salivary flow rate on diffusion of potassium chloride from artificial plaque at different sites in the mouth. J Dent Res. 1987;66(11):1614–1618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan RM. Intra-oral hydrogen-ion concentrations associated with dental caries activity. J Dent Res. 2016(1944);23(4):257–266.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg I, Jenkins GN, Chatterjee R, et al. The antimony pH electrode and its role in the assessment and interpretation of dental plaque pH. J Dent Res. 1982;61(10):1139–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejerskov O, Scheie AA, Manji F. The effect of sucrose on plaque pH in the primary and permanent dentition of caries-inactive and -active Kenyan children. J Dent Res. 1992;71(1):25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen WH. The Stephan Curve revisited. Odontology. 2013;101(1):2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imfeld TN. 3. Intraoral pH telemetry in man materials and methods. In: Imfeld TN, editor. Identification of low caries risk dietary components. Monographs in oral science. Vol.11. Basel. London: Karger; 1983. p. 9–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg-Gunn AJ, Edgar WM, Jenkins GN. The effect of altering the position of a sugary food in a meal upon plaque pH in human subjects. J Dent Res. 1981;60(5):867–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson DC, Mandel ID. The effect of saliva on plaque pH in vivo. J Dent Res. 1981;60(9):1634–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyvad B, Takahashi N. Integrated hypothesis of dental caries and periodontal diseases. J Oral Microbiol. 2020;12(1):1710953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Baelum V, Dige I. Improved pH-ratiometry for the three-dimensional mapping of pH microenvironments in biofilms under flow conditions. J Microbiol Methods. 2018;152:194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins LM, Dawes C. The surface area of the adult human mouth and thickness of the salivary film covering the teeth and oral mucosa. J Dent Res. 1987;66(8):1300–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main C, Geddest DAM, McNee SG, et al. Instrumentation for measurement of dental plaque thickness in situ. J Biomed Eng. 1984;6(2):151–154.
   Google Scholar
• DiSabato-Mordarski T, Kleinberg I. Measurement and comparison of the residual saliva on various oral mucosal and dentition surfaces in humans. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41(7):655–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen MF, Leonhardt D, Neland MLB, et al. A 3D printed microfluidic flow-cell for microscopy analysis of in situ-grown biofilms. J Microbiol Methods. 2020;171:105876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KWNIH. Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Meyer RL. Confocal microscopy imaging of the biofilm matrix. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;138:50–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardow A, Moe D, Nyvad B, et al. The buffer capacity and buffer systems of human whole saliva measured without loss of CO2. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daims H, Lücker S, Wagner M. daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8(2):200–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Kamp A, Garcia JE. A confocal microscopy based method to monitor extracellular pH in fungal biofilms. In FEMS yeast res. 2018;18:1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Ibsen CJS, Birkedal H, et al. Reduce biofilm formation and ph drops in in situ grown dental biofilms. Caries Res. 2017;51(1):26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Frost Kristensen M. Monitoring extracellular ph in cross-kingdom biofilms using confocal microscopy. J Vis Exp. 2020; 155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/60270.
   Google Scholar
• Schlafer S, Birkedal H, Olsen J, et al. Calcium-phosphate-osteopontin particles for caries control. Biofouling. 2016;32(4):349–357. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo H, Falsetta ML, Klein MI. The exopolysaccharide matrix: a virulence determinant of cariogenic biofilm. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12):1065–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart PS. Mini-review: convection around biofilms. Biofouling. 2012;28(2):187–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart PS. Diffusion in biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(5):1485–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Ingremeau F, Zhao A, et al. Local and global consequences of flow on bacterial quorum sensing. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(1):15005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan BL, Smith BG, Chopp DL. The influence of fluid flow on modeling quorum sensing in bacterial biofilms. Bull Math Biol. 2012;9(5):671–675.
   Google Scholar
• Ohle C, von, Gieseke A, Nistico L, et al. Real-time microsensor measurement of local metabolic activities in ex vivo dental biofilms exposed to sucrose and treated with chlorhexidine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2326–2334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlafer S. 67th ORCA congress: design of a new intraoral splint with 3D-printed inserts for dental biofilm collection. Caries Res. 2020;54:369–457.
   Google Scholar