References
- Ayer, A. 1971. Language, Truth and Logic. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
- Bullough, E. 1912. “‘Psychical Distance’ as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle.” The British Journal of Psychology 5: 1–9.
- Carroll, N. 2008. On Criticism. New York: Routledge.
- Hume, D. 1998. “Of the Standard of Taste.” In Selected Essays, edited by S. Copley and A. Edgar, 140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kant, I. 2007. Critique of Judgement. Translated by James C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kaufman, D. 2002. “Normative Criticism and the Objective Value of Artworks.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60: 151–166.
- Kaufman, D. 2003. “Critical Justification and Critical Laws.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 43: 393–400.
- Kölbel, M. 2003. “Faultless Disagreement.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 53–73.
- Kristensen, N., and U. From. 2015. “From Ivory Tower to Cross-media Personas: The Heterogeneous Cultural Critic in the Media.” Journalism Practice 9: 854.
- Lyons, W. E. 1980. Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- MacFarlane, J. 2005. “Making Sense of Relative Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–339.
- Najder, Z. 1975. Values and Evaluations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schellekens, E. 2008. “A Reasonable Objectivism for Aesthetic Judgements: Towards an Aesthetic Psychology.” PhD diss., King’s College London. 49–91.
- Smith, B. H. 1988. Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Strube, W. 1981. Sprachanalytische Ästhetik. Munich: Fink.
- Wittgenstein, L. 1967. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, 11. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Young, J. O. 2017. Semantics of Aesthetic Judgments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.