Success or failure? Presenting a case selection strategy for studies of school improvement

References

• Ainscow, Mel, and Chapman, Chris. 2005. The challenge of sustainable school improvement. Paper presented at the International Congress of School Effectiveness and Improvement, Barcelona, January 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, Mel, and Howes, Andy. 2007. Working together to improve urban secondary schools: a study of practice in one city. School Leadership & Management 27(3): 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, Roland, S. 1986. On sheep and goats and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4): 293–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossing, Ulf, Imsen, Gunn, and Lejf Moos (eds.). 2014. The Nordic Educational Model: ‘A School for All’ Encounters Neo-Liberal Policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bogotch, Ira, Mirón, Luis and Biesta, Gert. 2007. “Effective for what; effective for whom?” Two questions SESI should not ignore. In Townsend, Tony (ed.). International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement, 93–109. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, Anders, and Holmlund, Helena. 2011. 20 år med förändringar i skolan. Vad har hänt med likvärdigheten? Stockholm: SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Louis, Manion, Lawrence, and Morrison, Keith. 2006. Research Methods in Education 5th Edition. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, Bert P. M., Leonidas Kyriakides, and Sammons, Pam. 2010. Theory and research. The problem of causality. In Creemers, Bert, P.M., Kyriakides, Leonidas and Sammons, Pam (eds.). Methodological Advances in Educational Effectiveness Research, 37–58. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, Bert P. M., and Kyriakides, Leonidas. 2010. Explaining stability and change in school effectiveness by looking at changes in the functioning of school factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 21 (4): 409–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, Bert, P. M., Scheerens, Japp, and Reynolds, David. 2000. Theory Development in School Effectiveness Research. In Teddlie, Charles and Reynolds, David (eds.). The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research, 283–298. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L., and Bennet, Andrew. 2004. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, John. 2004. School effectiveness and the “other outcomes” of secondary schooling: A reassessment of three decades of British research. Improving Schools 7(2): 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Jan-Eric. 2013. Causal inference in educational effectiveness research: a comparison of three methods to investigate effects of homework on student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 24 (3): 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Jan-Eric and Yang Hansen, Kajsa. 2011. Förändringar i kommunskillnader i grundskoleresultat mellan 1998 och 2008. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige 16 (3): 161–178.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Jan-Eric and Myrberg, Eva. 2002. Ekonomiska resursers betydelse för pedagogiska resultat – en kunskapsöversikt. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Jan-Eric, Cliffordsson, Christina & Ericksson, Gudrun. 2014. Likvärdig kunskapsbedömning i och av den svenska skolan – problem och möjligheter. Stockholm: SNS utbildningskommission.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, Philip and Heck, Ronald H. 2011. Exploring the journey of school improvement: classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 22 (1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Alma. 2006. Leading change in schools in difficulty. Journal of Educational Change 7: 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, Graham, and Huges, David. 1995. Research and the Teacher. A Qualitative Introduction to School-Based Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, David. 2001. School improvement for real. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, David, Harris, Alma, Stoll, Louise and Mackay, Tony. 2011. School and System Improvement: State of the Art Review. Keynote presentation at the 24th International Congress of School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Cyprus, January 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, David, and Reynolds, David. 2001. The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards a third age. British Educational Research Journal 27 (4): 460–475.
   Google Scholar
• Höög, Jonas. 2010. Vad är en framgångsrik skola? In Höög, Jonas, and Johansson, Olof (eds.). Struktur, kultur, ledarskap – förutsättningar för framgångsrika skolor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Höög, Jonas, Johansson, Olof, and Olofsson, Anders 2005. Successful principalship: the Swedish case. Journal of Educational Administration 43 (6): 595–606.
   Google Scholar
• Höög, Jonas, Johansson, Olof, and Olofsson, Anders. 2009. Swedish successful schools revisited. Journal of Educational Administration 47 (6): 742–752.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, David, S. 2000. The school improvement journey: Perspectives on leadership. School Leadership & Management 20 (1): 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jarl, Maria, Fredriksson, Anders and Persson, Sofia. 2012. New public management in public education. A catalyst for the professionalization of Swedish school principals. Public Administration 90 (2): 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, Olof and Höög, Jonas. (eds.) 2010. Struktur, kultur, ledarskap – förutsättningar för framgångsrika skolor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, Leonidas. 2007. Generic and differentiated models of educational effectiveness: implications for the improvement of educational practice. In Townsend, Tony (ed.). International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement, 41–56. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Konsulterna som styr skolpolitiken. 2015. Sveriges Radio, Vetandets värld. 2 april. http://sverigesradio.se/sida/avsnitt/583043?programid=412
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, Leonidas, Creemers, Bert P. M., Antoniou, Panayiotis and Demetris, Demetriou. 2010. A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: implications for theory and research. British Educational Research Journal 36 (5): 807–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna. S., and Guba, Egon G. 2000. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Denzin, Norman K., and Lincoln, Yvonna, S (eds.). Handbook of qualitative research 2nd edition, 163–188. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, Lisbeth. 2002. Sweden: Decentralization, Deregulation, Quasi-markets – and then what? Journal of Education Policy 17 (6): 687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. 1967. A system of logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (the original published in 1843).
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaidou, Maria, and Ainscow, Mel. 2005. Understanding Failing Schools: Perspectives from the inside. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 16 (3): 229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, John D. and Watt, Joyce, S. 1984 Case Study. In Bell, Judith, Buch, Tony, Fox, Alan, Goodey, Jane and Goulding, Sandy (eds.). Conducting Small-scale Investigations in Educational Managment, 79–92. London: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Nordenbo, Sven-Erik, Holm, Anders, Elstad, Eyvind, Scheerens, Jaap, Søgaard Larsen, Michael, Uljens, Michael, Laursen, Per Fibaek, Hauge, Trond Eiliv. 2010. Input, process, and learning in primary and lower secondary schools. A systematic review carried out for The Nordic Indicator Workgroup (DNI) (Technical Report Clearinghouse – Research Series 2010 Number 06). Copenhagen: Danish Clearinghouse for Educational Research, DPU; and Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Pring, Richard. 2000. Philosophy of Educational Research. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, David, Sammons, Pam, De Fraine, Bieke, Townsend, Tony and Van Damme, Jan. 2011. Educational Effectiveness Research (EER): A State of the Art Review. Paper presented at the 24th International congress of School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Cyprus, January 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo. 2012. Varför är vissa skolor mer framgångsrika än andra? In Jarl, Maria and Pierre, Jon (eds.). Skolan som politisk organisation, 67–89. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2012a. Beskrivande data om förskola, skola och vuxenutbildning 2012. Rapport 383. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2012b. Likvärdig utbildning i svensk grundskola? En kvantitativ analys av likvärdighet över tid. Rapport 374. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, Charles, and Reynolds, David (eds.). 2000. International handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, Charles, and Sammons, Pam 2010. Applications of mixed methods to the field of educational effectiveness research. In Creemers, Bert P. M., Kyriakides, Leonidas and Sammons, Pam (eds.). Methodological Advances in Educational Effectiveness Research, 115–152. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan, and Svensson, Torsten. 2010. Att fråga och att svara. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• The GOLD database, Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, http://ips.gu.se/english/Research/research_databases/gold ( Accessed 2015-06-29).
   Google Scholar
• The SIRIS database, Swedish National Agency for Education, http://siris.skolverket.se/siris/f?p=Siris:1:0 ( Accessed 2015-06-29).
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, Tony (ed.) 2007. International Handbook of school effectiveness and school improvement: Review, reflection, and reframing. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, Tony and MacBeath, John (eds). 2011. International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, Martin. 2002. Why “meddling” is necessary: A response to Teddlie, Reynolds, Townsend, Scheerens, Bosker and Creemers. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 13 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Werfhorst, Herman G., and Mijs. Jonathan, J.B. 2010. Achievement Inequality and the Institutional Structure of Educational Systems: A Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 407–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walford, Geoffrey. 2002. Redefining school effectiveness. Westminster Studies in Education 25 (1): 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research Design and Methods. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar