Teaching and learning physics using technology: Making a case for the affective domain

References

• Alsop, Steve and Watts, Mike. (2000a). Facts and feelings: Exploring the affective domain in the learning of physics. Physics Education, 35(2), 132–139.
   Google Scholar
• Alsop, Steve and Watts, Mike. (2000b). Interviews about scenarios: exploring the affective domain in science education. Research in Education, 63, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, Charoula and Valanides, Nicos. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwaruddin, Sadar. (2015). ICTs in language and literacy education in Bangladesh: A critical review. Current Issues in Education, 18(1), 1–12. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1282
   Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling, Jennifer. (2001). Thematics networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research . Qualitative Researc, I h (3), 385–405.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, Ossi. (2011). The development of technological competence from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Technology Education, 22(2), 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, Ossi and Hansen, Ronald. (2002). Defining and measuring technical thinking: Students technical abilities in Finnish comprehensive schools. Journal of Technology Education, 14(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Baeck Unn-Doris. (2010). Parental involvement practices in formalised home-school cooperation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), 549–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bah-lalya, Ibrahima. (2006). Mauritius 2000-2005 Educational Reform: Initiating and Conducting and Experimental Peer Review Exercise in Africa. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, Sasha; Hay, Kenneth; Barnett, Michael and Squire, Kurt. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, Sasha and Kirshner, David. (2001). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, Pamela and Jack, Susan. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–556.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Randy; Maeng, Jennifer and Binns, Ian. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation programme informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 348–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, Leema and Hammer, David. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickenstaff, Jacob. (2010). A framework for understanding physics instruction in secondary and college courses. Research Papers in Education, 25(2), 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borinca, Islam and Maliqi, Amir. (2015). The influence of teachers on increasing students’ motivation to the Ismail Qemaili High School in the city of Kamenica, Kosovo. Psychology, 6, 915–921.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, Hilda; Whitcomb, Jennie and Liston, Daniel. (2009). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning [Editorial]. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 3–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, Lucy. (2015). Parental involvement in school benefits students and develops teacher-parent relationships. Journal of Initial Teacher Inquiry, 1, 54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Bruce and Campbell, Linda. (2008). Mindful learning: 101 proven strategies for student and teacher success (2nd ed.). London: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, Paul; Confrey, Jere; diSessa, Andrea; Lehrer, Richard and Schauble, Leona. (2003). Designs experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, Helen. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge, & L. Y. Muilenburg, Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Florence: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, Larry. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Jesus, Pedrosa. (2014). Managing the affect of learners' questions in undergraduate chemistry. Studies In Higher Education, 39(1), 102–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, Janet; Kinney, David and Hofferth, Sandra. (2003). Parental ideologies and children’s after-school activities. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1359–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durik, Amanda and Harackiewicz, Judith. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 597–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, Richard and Osborne, Jonathan. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39–72.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, Jacquelynne and Wigfield, Allan. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Joyce and Salinas, Karen. (2004). Partnering with families and communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Weihua and Williams, Cathy. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, Jennifer and Muir-Cochrane, Eimear. (2006). Demonstrating rigour using thematics analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. The International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, Julie. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. J. Loughran (Eds.). Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education (pp.28–42). NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadirian, Hajar; Ayub, Ahmad; Silong, Daud; Bakar, Kamariah and Zabeh, Ali. (2014). Knowledge sharing behavior among students in learning environments: A review of literature. Asian Social Science, 10(4), 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, Michel. (2008). Complexity of teachers’ knowledge: a synthesis between personal goals, collective culture and conceptual knowledge. Paper presented at Network 10 – Teacher Education Research, European Conference on Educational Research (ECER). Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, Michel and Hudson, Brian. (2015). A new model for understanding the growth of science teacher professional knowledge. In M. Grangeat (Ed.), Understanding Science Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Growth (pp. 205–228). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, Michel and Kapelari, Suzanne. (2015). Exploring the growth of science teacher’s professional knowledge. In M. Grangeat (Ed.), Understanding Science Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Growth (pp. 1–9). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, Randall; Spickler, Donald; Bergner, Jennifer and Bardzell, Michael. (2009). A qualitative approach to assessing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4), 392–411.
   Google Scholar
• Guillies, Robyn. (2011). Promoting thinking, problem-solving and reasoning during small group discussions. Teachers & TeachingL Theory and Practice, 17(1), 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, Judith; Barron, Kenneth; Tauer, John; Carter, Suzanne and Elliot, Andrew. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Alma and Goodall, Janet. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50(3), 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, John and Timperley, Helen. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderlong, Jennifer and Lepper, Mark. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Peter; English, Lyn and Dawes, Les. (2009). Analysing preservice teachers’ potential for implementing engineering education in the middle school. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 15(3), 165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ionas, Ioan; Cernusca, Dan and Collier, Harvest. (2012). Prior Knowledge Influence on Self-Explanation Effectiveness When Solving Problems: An Exploratory Study in Science Learning. International Journal of Teaching & learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 349–358.
   Google Scholar
• Isseks, Marc. (2011). When teachers reduce curriculum content to bullet points, student learning suffers. Educational Leardership, 74–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jethro, Olojo and Aina, Falemu. (2012). Effects of parental involvement on the academic performance of student in elementary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 196–202.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Karen and Golombek, Paula. (2016). Mindful L2 Teacher Education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teacher’s professional development. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jupp, Victor. (2006). The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kapon, Shulamit. (2015). From new educational technologies to a personal-instructional repertoire. In M. Grangeat (Ed.), Understanding Science Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Growth (pp. 171–186). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, ChanMin; Kim, Min; Lee, Chiajung; Spector, Michael and DeMeester, Karen. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, Matthew & Dougherty, Shawn. (2013). The effect of teacher–family communication on student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(3), 199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, David; Bloom, Benjamin and Maisia, Bertram. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classifications of educational goals, handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Eva; Li, Hui and Rao, Nirmala. (2011). Parental involvement and children’s readiness for school in China. Educational Research, 53(1), 95–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Cherin and Krapfl, Lisa. (2002). Teaching as you would have them teach: An effective elementary science teacher preparation program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 247–265.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Cher Ping; Zhao, Yong;Tondeur, Jo; Chai, Ching Sing; Tsai, Chin-Chung. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2),59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, Joanne. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Menheere, Adri, and Hooge, Edith. (2010). Parental involvement in children’s education: A review study about the effect of parental involvement on children’s school education with a focus on the position of illiterate parents. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network (JETEN), 6, 144–157
   Google Scholar
• Merkley, Donna; Schmidt, Denise; Dirksen, Carrie and Fuhler, Carol. (2006). Enhancing parent-communication using technology: A reading improvement clinic example. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 11–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mestry, Raj and Bennie, Grobler. (2007). Collaboration and communication as effective strategies for parent involvement in public schools. Educational Research & Review, 2(7), 176–185.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, Muller and Perret-Clemont, Anne. (2009). Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices. NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, Punya and Koehler, Matthew. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, Punya and Koehler, Matthew. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Confernece 2007 (pp. 2214–2226). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Jenny. (2005). Progression in higher education: A study of learning as represented in level descriptors. In P. Hartley, A. Woods, & M. Pill, Enhancing Teaching in Highr Education. London: Routledge Falmer. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Muller, Florian and Palekcic, Marko. (2005). Continuity of motivation in higher education: A three-year follow-up study. Review of Psychology,12(1),31–43.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Paul and Linnenbrink-Garcia, Lisa. (2014). The role of interest in optimising performance and self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Jonathan; Erduran, Sibel and Simon, Shirley. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachler, Norbert; Bachmair, Ben and Cook, John. (2011). Mobile Learning. Structure, Agency, Practices. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, Claudia. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environment Change, 19, 354–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, Erika; Cooper, Harris; Robinson, Jorgianne. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrosa-de-Jesus, Helena, Moreira, Aurora, Lopes, Betina, & Watts, Mike. (2014). So much that just a list: exploring the nature of critical questionning in undergraduate sciences. Research In Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 115-134. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2014.902811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, Jean. (1971). Biology and Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, Margaret; Hare, Dwight and Howard, Esther. (2005). Enhancing technology use in student teaching: A case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 573–618.
   Google Scholar
• Ramma, Yashwantrao; Bholoa, Ajeevsing; Watts, Mike and Ramasawmy, Jagambal. (2014). Pre-and in-service physics teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge: Implications and Challenges. American International Journal of Research in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, 8(1), 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ramma, Yashwantrao; Samy, Martin and Gopee, Ajit (2015). Creativity and innovation in science and technology - bridging the gap between secondary and tertiary levels of education. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(1), 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramma, Yashwantrao;Tan, Kah-Chye & Mariaye, Hyleen. (2009). Engaging Mauritian primary school pupils to develop core constructs in science using PDA wth a learner centered pedagogy. International Science Education Conference. Singapore: NIE.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, Ann and Hidi, Suzanne. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Keith and Harris, Angel. (2014). The Broken Compass: Parental Involvement with Children’s Education. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, Jeremy; Shechtman, Nicole; Tatar, Deborah; Hegedus, Stephen; Hopkins, Bill; Empson, Susan; Knudsen, Jennifer and Gallagher, Lawrence. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum and professional development for advancing middle school physics: Three large scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, Christine. (2011). The new meaning of mobility. New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology & Society, 31, 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Kathleen. (2013). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science. In B. F. Jones, & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 139–176). NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, Alfred; Wighting, Mervyn; Baker, Jason and Grooms, Linda. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Allison and Patrick, Helen. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard and Deci, Edward. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacker, Amanda; Schoon, Ingrid and Bartley, Mel. (2002). Social inequality in educational achievement and psychosocial adjustment throughout childhood: magnitude and mechanisms. Social Science and Medicine, 55(5), 863–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, Victor and Blanchard, Margaret. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapungan, Gina and Sapungan, Ronel. (2014). Parental involvement in child’s education: Importance, barriers and benefits. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 3(2), 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Savard, Caude. (2014). The use of mental model-centered instruction in teaching a university course. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 3(1), 241–247.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Denise; Baran, Evrim; Thompson, Ann. D., Mishra, Punya; Koehler, Matthew and Shin, Tae. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
   Google Scholar
• Seebaluck, Ashley and Seegum, Trisha. (2012). Motivation among public primary school teachers in Mauritius. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(4), 446–464.
   Google Scholar
• Shelly, Gary; Gunter, Glenda and Gunter, Randolph. (2012). Teachers discovering computers: Integrating technology in a connected world (7th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, Kerry. (2006). Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stanhope, Daniel; and Corn, Jenifer. (2014). Acquiring teacher commitment to 1:1 initiatives: The role of th etechnology facilitator. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(3), 252–276. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.888271
   Google Scholar
• Tiryakioglu, Filiz and Erzurum, Funda. (2011). Use of social networks as an educational tool. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, David and Duit, Reinders. (2009). Multiple perspectives of conceptual change in science and the challenges ahead. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(2), 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Turanli, Adem. (2009). Students’ and parents’ perceptions about homework. Education and Science, 34(153), 61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Joi and Sampson, Victor. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westera, Wim. (2015). Reframing the role of educational media technologies. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(2), 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, Allan and Cambria, Jenna. (2010). Stduents’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, Allan and Eccles, Jacquelynne. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zainal, Zaidah. (2007). Case study as a research method. Journal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, Anat. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher order thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 293–312.
   Google Scholar