1,551
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The Cross-School Teacher Team as a Site for Learning

ORCID Icon

References

  • Aspfors, Jessica. (2012). Induction Practices: Experiences of Newly Qualified Teachers. Vasa: Faculty of Education Åbo Akademi University Vasa.
  • Aspfors, Jessica., Pörn, Michaela., Forsman, Liselott., Salo, Petri., & Karlberg-Granlund, Gunilla. (2015). The researcher as a negotiator – exploring h teachers. Education Inquiry, 6(4), 401–416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.27045
  • Blossing, Ulf. & Ekholm, Mats. (2008) A Central School Reform Program in Sweden and the Local Response: Taking the Long Term View Works. Urban Education, 43(6). 624–652
  • Borko, Hilda. (2004) Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain, Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
  • Day, Christoffer. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer.
  • Falconer, Liz. (2006). Organizational learning, tacit information, and e-learning: a review. The Learning Organization, 13(2). 140–151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09696470610645476
  • Fenwick, Tara. (2012). Complexity science and professional learning for collaboration: a critical reconsideration of possibilities and limitations. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1): 141–162, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644911
  • Fenwick, Tara, Nerland, Monika., & Jensen, Karen. (2012). Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualizing professional learning and practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1): 1–13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644901
  • Handal, Gunnar. (1999). Consultation Using Critical Friends. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 79, 59–7.
  • Handal, Gunnar. (2007). Handledaren – guru eller kritisk vän? [The Mentor – Guru or Critical Friend?] In Tomas Kroksmark & Karin Åberg (Eds.). Handledning i pedagogiskt arbete [Mentoring in Educational Work] (19–31). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Hargreaves, Andy. (1998). Läraren i det postmoderna samhället. [The Teacher in the Postmodern Society] Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Hargreaves, Andy (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. Maidenhead: Open University
  • Hermerén, Göran. (2011). God forskningssed [Research Guidelines from the Swedish Research Council]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
  • Kemmis, Stephen. & Grootenboer, Peter. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In Stephen. Kemmis and Tracey.J. Smith (Eds.). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37–64). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Kemmis, Stephen. (2010). What is professional practice? Recognizing and respecting diversity in understandings of practice. Elaborating Professionalism: Studies in Practice and Theory 5, 139–165.
  • Kemmis, Stephen, Edwards-Groves, Christine, Wilkinson, Jane & Hardy, Ian (2012). Ecologies of practices. In Paul Hager, Alison Lee and Ann Reich (Ed.), Professional and practice-based learning: practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (pp. 33-49) Heidelberg, Netherlands: Springer. http://doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_3
  • Kemmis, Stephen., Wilkinson, Jane., Edwards-Groves, Christine., Grootenboer, Peter., Hardy, Ian. & Bristol, Laurette. (2014). Changing Practices, Changing Education. Singapore: Springer.
  • Knutas, Agneta (2008). Mellan styrning och moral: berättelser om ett lärarlag. [Between Governing and Teachers’ Morality. Narratives Around a Team of Teachers]. Diss. Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2009
  • Langelotz, Lill. (2013). Så görs en (o)skicklig lärare [How a (un)skillfull teacher is made]. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige 2013, 18(3–4), 258–279.
  • Langelotz, Lill. (2014). Vad gör en skicklig lärare? En studie om kollegial handledning som utvecklingspraktik. [What ‘Make(s)’ a Good Teacher? A Study of Peer Group Mentoring as a Practice of Professional Development]. (Doctoral thesis, Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences, 348). Göteborg: Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Levine, Thomas H. & Marcus, Alan S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 389–398.
  • Little, Judith. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8),917–946. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1162717?origin=JSTOR-pdf
  • Lohman, Margaret C. (2005). A survey of factors influencing the engagement of two professional groups in informal workplace learning activities. Human Resource Development Quarterly,16, 501–527.
  • Mak, Barley. & Pun, Shuk-Han. (2015) Cultivating a teacher community of practice for sustainable professional development: beyond planned efforts, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 21(1),4–21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928120
  • Mason, Jennifer. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.
  • Matzat, Uwe. (2013). Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, 60(1), 40–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.006
  • McCormick Calkins, Lucy. (1994). The Art of Teaching Writing. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.
  • McCormick Calkins, Lucy. (2001). The Art of Teaching Reading. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
  • Meirink, Jacobiene A., Imants, Jeroen., Meijer, Paulien C. & Verloop, Nico. (2010) Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams, Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2),161–181, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.481256
  • Meirink, Jacobiene.A., Meijer, Paulien.C., & Verloop, Nico. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 145–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540600601152496
  • Muijs, Daniel., & Harris, Alma. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8) 961–972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010
  • Mäkitalo, Åsa. (2012). Professional learning and the materiality of social practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 59–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644905
  • Nerland, Monika. & Jensen, Karen. (2012). Epistemic practices and object relations in professional work. Journal of Education and Work. 25(1), 101–120, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644909
  • Nicolini, Davide. (2013). Practice Theory, Work, & Organization. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ohlsson Jon (Eds) (2004). Arbetslag och lärande. Lärares organiserande av samarbete i organisationspedagogisk belysning. [Teacher Teams and Learning. Teachers´Organisation of Collaboration in an Organisation Educatioal Light] Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Opfer, Darleen V. & Pedder, David. (2011) Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3),376–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
  • Raelin, Joseph A. (2008). Toward an Epistemology of Practice. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(4), 495–515.
  • Reich, Ann. & Hager Paul. (2014). Problematising practice, learning and change: practice-theory perspectives on professional learning. Journal of Workplace Learning 26(6/7) 418–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JWL-02-2014-0016
  • Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr-Cetina, Karin & Savigny, Eike von (Eds.) (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge
  • SFS 2010:800. Skollag. [School law] Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet
  • Skolverket (2011). Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool class and the Recreation Centre 2011. http://skolverket.se/om-skolverket/andra-sprak-och-lattlast/in-english/publications
  • Skolverket. (2013). Lärarnas yrkesvardag: en nationell kartläggning av grundskollärares tidsanvändning [The Teachers Professional Workday: a Survey of Compulsory School Teachers Use of Time]. Stockholm: Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education] (Skolverkets Rapport 2013:385) http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3001
  • Skolverket. (2015). Grundskollärares tidsanvändning: en fördjupad analys av “Lärarnas yrkesvardag” [Compulsory School Teachers Use of Time: an In-depth Analysis of “The Teachers Professional Workday”]. Stockholm: Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education] (Skolverkets Rapport 2015:417)http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3374
  • Smith, Alison A. (2007). Mentoring for experienced school principals: professional learning in a safe space. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in learning. 15(3). 277–291
  • Smith, Tracy. J. (2008). Fostering a practice stance in pre-service teacher education. In Stephen Kemmis & Tracy. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 65–84). Rotterdam: Sense
  • SSH REB (2005). Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Participant Observation. University of Toronto
  • Stedt, Lisbeth. (2013), Samarbete och lärande: Om friktion, uppgifters komplexitet och erfarenhetsutbyten i samarbete [Cooperation and Learning: About Friction, the Complexity of Tasks, and Exchange of Experience in Cooperation]. Diss. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, 2013.
  • Tjernberg, Catharina. (2013). Framgångsfaktorer i läs- och skrivlärande: en praxisorienterad studie med utgångspunkt i skolpraktiken [Success Factors in Teaching Reading and Writing: a Praxis-Oriented Study Based on School Practices]. Diss. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, 2013.
  • Trageton, Arne. (2003) Creative writing on computers, Grade 1–4: Writing to Read. 13th European Conference on Reading. Tallin, Estonia.
  • Vangrieken, Katrien, Doshy, Filip, Raes, Elisabeth & Kyndt, Eva. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002