Processes of reforming: The case of the Norwegian state school inspection policy frameworks

References

• Aguerrondo, I., & Vezub, L. (2011). Leadership for effective school improvement: Support for schools and teachers’ professional development in the Latin American region. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 691–715). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Andenæs, K. (2016). Metode for tilsyn – en juridisk og rettssosiologisk vurdering av hjelpemidler for gjennomføring av tilsyn i skolen [Methods for inspection: a legal and socio-legal assessment of tools used in inspection of schools]. In K. Andenæs & J. Møller (Eds.), Retten i skolen – mellom pedagogikk, jus og politikk [Legal issues in schools: Between pedagogy, law, and politics] (pp. 123–137). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Andenæs, K., & Møller, J. (Eds.). (2016). Retten i skolen – mellom pedagogikk, jus og politikk [Legal issues in schools: Between pedagogy, law, and politics]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactment in secondary schools. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. A., Grek, S., & Segerholm, C. (2015). Regulatory frameworks: Shifting frameworks, shifting criteria. In S. Grek & J. Lindgren (Eds.), Governing by inspection (pp. 74–95). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality - A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I. (2001). Towards European convergence of higher education policy. Higher Education Management, 13(3), 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bowe, R., Ball, S. J., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in political sociology. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., & O’Brien, S. (2016). Exploring the changing face of school inspections. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 66, 1–26. doi:10.14689/ejer.2016.66.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. P. (1993). The reforming organization. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlbaum, S., Hult, A., Lindgren, J., Novak, J., Rönnberg, L., & Segerholm, C. (2014). Skolinspektion som styrning [School inspection as governing]. Utbildning och demokrati, 23(1), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J. (2016). Post-panopticism and school inspection in England. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(4), 623–642. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.965806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X019001003
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R., & Robertson, S. (Eds.). (2009). Globalisation and Europeanisation in education. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Grauwe, A. (2007). Transforming school supervision into a tool for quality improvement. International Review of Education, 53(5), 709–714. doi:10.1007/s11159-007-9057-9
   Google Scholar
• Dedering, K., & Müller, S. (2011). School improvement through inspections? First empirical insights from Germany. Journal of Educational Change, 12(3), 301–322. doi:10.1007/s10833-010-9151-9
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstad, E. (2009). Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: School accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), 173–189. doi:10.1007/s11092-009-9076-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T. (2012). Documents and documentary analysis. In A. Briggs, M. Coleman, & M. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership and management (pp. 296–308). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Government Act. (1860). Lov om almueskolevæsenet på landet [Act of public rural schools]. Retrieved from http://www.nb.no/nbsok/nb/5af17be02e2d51301098b02182119a68#1
   Google Scholar
• Government Act. (1998). Act of 17 July 1998 no. 61 relating to primary and secondary education and training. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kd/vedlegg/grunnskole/dokumenter/educationact_with_amendments_entered2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2015). Inspectors in Europe – SICI and the role of meditative work. In S. Grek & J. Lindgren (Eds.), Governing by inspection (pp. 38–57). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Møller, J. (2017). National testing: Gains or strains? School leaders’ responses to policy demands. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(3), 455–474. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1205200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, H., Grimaldi, E., Hall, D., & Serpieri, R. (Eds.). (2016). New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. (2016). State school inspection: The Norwegian example (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. (2017a). Examining school inspectors and educational directors within the organisation of school inspection policy: Perceptions and views. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 112–126. doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1120234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. (2017b). “Governing by templates” through new modes of school inspection in Norway. Journal of Educational Change, 18(2), 161–182. doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9295-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. (2017c, April). “Moving through the checkout line”? Legal standards, performance and state school inspection policy. Paper presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B., & Sivesind, K. (2015). State school inspection policy in Norway and Sweden (2002-2012): A reconfiguration of governing modes? Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 429–458. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.945488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O. (1991). Idéer om reformism. Texter av Thomas Humphrey Marshall, Adam Przeworski, Gøsta Esping-Andersen, Jon Elster [Ideas on reformism. Texts by Thomas H. Marshall, Adam Przeworski, Gøsta Esping-Andersen, Jon Elster]. Stockhom: Tidens.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2006). Policy tools and institutional change: Comparing educational policies in Norway, Sweden and England. Journal of Public Policy, 26(2), 141–165. doi:10.1017/S0143814X0600050X
   Google Scholar
• Holm, V., & Møller, J. (2016). Tilsyn – en hjelp i forebyggende arbeid med skolemiljøet? [Inspection: Support in preventive work in school environment?]. In I. K. Andenæs & J. Møller (Eds), Retten i skolen– Mellom pedagogikk, jus og politikk [Legal issues in schools: Between pedagogy, law, and politics] (pp. 263–278). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the tools of government after two decades. Governance, 20(1), 127–144. doi:10.1111/gove.2007.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G. (2011). School governance in Switzerland: Tensions between new roles and old traditions. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(4), 469–485. doi:10.1177/1741143211405349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., Møller, J., & Aasen, P. (2013). Reformtakter: Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform measures: On renewal and stability in compulsory education]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kjærnsli, M., & Jensen, F. (Eds). (2016). Stø kurs – Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, matematikk og lesing i PISA 2015 [On track: Norwegian students’ competency in science, numeracy and reading in PISA 2015]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, J. (2015). The front and back stages of Swedish school inspection: Opening the black box of judgment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(1), 58–76. doi:10.1080/00313831.2013.838803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, J., Hult, A., Segerholm, C., & Rönnberg, L. (2012). Mediating school inspection: Key dimensions and keywords in agency text production 2003–2010. Education Inquiry, 3(4), 569–590. doi:10.3402/edui.v3i4.22055
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2010). Rediscovering institutions – The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster/Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mediås, O. A. (1996). Skoledirektørembetet i Norge – 1860–1992 [The office of the school directors in Norway – 1860–1992]. Oslo: Ministry of Education, Research and Church Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (2014). Ledelse som masteridé i norsk skole sett i et internasjonalt perspektiv [Leadership as a master idea in Norwegian education viewed in an international perspective]. In K. A. Røvik, E. M. Furu, & T. V. Eilertsen (Eds.), Reformideer i norsk skole: Spredning, oversettelse og implementering [Reform ideas in Norwegian education: Proliferation, translation and implementation] (pp. 147–166). Oslo: Cappelen.
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.
   Google Scholar
• Nihlfors, E., & Johansson, O. (Eds). (2014). Skolledare i mötet mellan nationella mål och lokal policy [School leaders in between national goals and local policy]. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (UDIR). (2007). Procedures for county governors’ offices inspection in compliance with the Education Act and the Private School Act - Regular state inspection. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (UDIR). (2010). Instructions for regular state inspection 2010/2011. Theme: Students’ psycho-social environment. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training .
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (UDIR). (2013a). Inspection in the educational sector – A handbook in inspection methods (Version 1.1.). Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training .
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (UDIR). (2013b). Methods for inspection – A handbook of inspection methods in compliance with the Pre-School Act and the Education Act. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training . Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/contentassets/2f75a647ad154220943175f1834a4641/metodehandbok-tilsyn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1989). Ekspertvurdering fra OECD [Expert assessment from OECD]. In Kultur- Og Vitenskapsdepartementet, Kirke- Og Undervisningsdepartementet & O. F. K. O. Ø. S. (The OECD) (Eds.), OECD-vurdering av norsk utdanningspolitikk. Andre del [Reviews of national policies for education. Norway. Second section] (pp. 109–196). Oslo: Aschehoug.
   Google Scholar
• Ottesen, E. (2013). Grunnleggende ferdigheter og individuell vurdering - mellom regulering og profesjonsmakt [Basic skills and individual assessment – Between regulation and professional empowerment]. In B. Karseth, J. Møller, & P. Aasen (Eds), Reformtakter: Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform measures: On renewal and stability in compulsory education] (pp. 119–134). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ottesen, E., & Møller, J. (2016). Organisational routines – The interplay of legal standards and professional discretion. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 428–446. doi:10.1177/1474904116638853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P., Segerholm, C., & Simola, H. (Eds.). (2011). Fabricating quality in education – Data and governance in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., Segerholm, C., & Lawn, M. (2015). The history and development of the inspectorates in England, Sweden and Scotland. In S. Grek & J. Lindgren (Eds.), Governing by inspection (pp. 58–73). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161. doi:10.1080/02680930500500138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2007). Inspection and emotion. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(2), 173–190. doi:10.1080/03057640701372418
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis - New Public Management, governance and the neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society – Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation. (2006). Forskrift til opplæringsloven FOR-2006-06-23-724 [Regulation Pertaining to the Education Act, 1998]. Oslo: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, L. (2011). Exploring the intersection of marketisation and central state control through Swedish national school inspection. Education Inquiry, 2(4), 689–707. doi:10.3402/edui.v2i4.22007
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1990). A matter of record. Documentary sources in social research. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segerholm, C. (2012, September 18–21). Inspection and policy brokering: Europe in Sweden? Symposium Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), NW 23: Cadiz, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. (2008). Reformulating reform: Curriculum history revisited (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. (2009). Juss + ped = sant? Om felles nasjonalt tilsyn i Oslo og Akershus 2008 [Law and pedagogy = truth? On regular inspection in Oslo and Akershus counties 2008]. Acta Didactica No. 1. Oslo: Department of Teacher Education and School Research, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., & Bachmann, K. (2011). Et felles nasjonalt tilsyn – om forholdet mellom statlig styring og faglig skjønn [National regular inspection – On the relationship between state governing and professional judgment]. In J. Møller & E. Ottesen (Eds.), Rektor som leder og sjef – om styring, ledelse og kunnskapsutvikling [School principal as leader and supervisor] (pp. 51–73). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., Skedsmo, G., & Hall, J. B. (2016). Et felles nasjonalt tilsyn: Reformbaner og scenarier [Regular state school inspection: Reform trajectories and scenarios]. In K. Andenæs & J. Møller (Eds.), Retten i skolen – Mellom pedagogikk, jus og politikk [Legal issues in schools: Between pedagogy, law, and politics] (pp. 99–122). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G. (2009). School governing in transition. Perspectives, purposes and perceptions of evaluation policy ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G., & Møller, J. (2016). Governing by new performance expectations in Norwegian schools. In H. Gunter, D. Hall, R. Serpieri, & E. Grimaldi (Eds.), New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice (pp. 53–65). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2010). The politics and economics of comparison. Comparative Education Review, 54(3), 323–342. doi:10.1086/653047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (Eds.). (2012). World Yearbook of Education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Weinbaum, E. H. (Eds.). (2008). The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O. (1997). Utdanningsreformene – Oversikt og analyse [Education reforms: Overview and analysis]. Oslo: Didakta.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper no. 20. (2013). Meld. St. 20 (2012–2013) På rett vei – Kvalitet og mangfold i fellesskolen [On the right track: Quality and diversity in comprehensive school]. Oslo: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper no. 21. (2017). Meld. St. 21 (2016–2017) Lærelyst – tidlig innsats og kvalitet i skolen [Desire to learn – Early intervention and quality in schools]. Oslo: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper no. 37. (1991). Meld. St. 37 (1990–1991) Organisering og styring i utdanningssektoren [Organising and governing in the educational sector]. Oslo: Ministry of Education, Research, and Church Affairs.
   Google Scholar