Justice through participation: student engagement in Nordic classrooms

References

• Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Cambridge MA: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandersson, K., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Eleverna och internet [Students and the internet]. Stockholm: Report SE.
   Google Scholar
• Aukrust, V. G. (2003). Dialogues in Norwegian classrooms: Participation patterns and dialogic features [Samtaledeltakelse i norske klasserom – En studie av deltakerstrukturer og samtalebevegelser]. In K. Klette (Ed.), Classroom teaching practice after curriulum reform 1997 [Evaluering av Reform 97. [Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97]. Oslo: Unipib Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bellack, A. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergem, O. K., & Klette, K. (2010). Mathematical tasks as catalysts for student talk: Analysing discourse in a Norwegian mathematics classroom. In Y. Shimizu, B. Kaur, R. Huang, & D. Clark (Eds.), Mathematical tasks in classrooms around the world (pp. 35–62). Boston: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M. (2012). Digital literacy in upper secondary school–What do students use their laptops for during teacher instruction? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(02), 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M. (2014). Redefining school literacy. Prominent literacy practices across subjects in upper secondary school ( Doctoral dissertation). Retreived from https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/38160
   Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M. (2017). Key challenges of using video when investigating social practices in education: Contextualization, magnification, and representation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(5), 511–523. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2016.1181162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M., & Davies, C. (2017). Assessing the educational value of one-to-one devices: Have we been asking the right questions? Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 311–331. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1305045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2015). Researching literacy in context: Using video analysis to explore school literacies. Literacy, 49(3), 140–148. doi:10.1111/lit.v49.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branden, K. (2000). Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? A study of multilingual primary school classes. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 426–443. doi:10.1598/RRQ.35.3.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtzæg, P. B. (2016). The social media natives. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. 149–162). Rotterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Myrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 301–326. doi:10.1080/00313830600743357
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (Vol. 1). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalland, C. P., & Klette, K. (2016, December). Individual teaching methods: Work plans as a tool for promoting self-regulated learning in lower secondary classrooms? Education Inquiry, 7(4), 381–404. doi:10.3402/edui.v7.28249
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation. Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 205–223. doi:10.1080/00313830801915853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, H.E., & Neumann, K. (2012). Video analysis as a tool for understanding science instruction. In Jorde, D. & Dillon, J. (Eds), Science education research and practice (pp. 115–140). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E., & Shavelson, R. (2009). Guidance, conceptual understanding, and student learning: An investigation of inquiry-based teaching in the US. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. New York, NY: Waxman.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). New literacy studies. From the ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 177–194). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445–470. doi:10.1086/669901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, H. W. (2005). Five essential components for social justice education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38(2), 103–109. doi:10.1080/10665680590935034
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, A. D. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, J. H. (1969). The persistence of the recitation. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 145–167. doi:10.3102/00028312006002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittani, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., … Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & Boyd, D. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation in youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juzwik, M. M., Nystrand, M., Kelly, S., & Sherry, M. B. (2011). Oral narrative genres as dialogic resources for classroom literature study: A contextualized case study of conversational narrative discussion. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1111–1154. doi:10.3102/0002831208321444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. (2010). Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction ( Doctoral dissertation), University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2018). Observation manuals as lenses to classroom teaching: Pitfalls and possibilities. European Educational Research Journal, 17(01), 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Roe, A. (2017). Linking instruction and student achievement: Research design for a new generation of classroom studies. Acta Didactica Norge - Tidsskrift for Fagdidaktisk Forsknings- Og Utviklingsarbeid I Norge, 11, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2018). Individualism and collectivism in Nordic schools. A comparative approach. In N. Witoszek, D. S. Wilson, & A. Midttun (Eds.), Reneweing the Nordic model. London: Routledge, Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). Instructional activities and discourse features in science classrooms: Teachers talking and students listening or…? In K. Klette, O. K. Bergem, & A. Roe (Eds.), Teaching and learning in lower secondary schools in the Era of PISA and TIMSS. Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2009). Challenges in strategies for complexity reduction in video studies. Experiences from the PISA+ study. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 61–83). Münster: Waxmann Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2005). The discursive practice of participation in an elementary classroom community. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 33(3), 213–250. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-2810-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• LK06. (2006). Kunnskapsløftet. Læreplanen for grunnskolen [National Curriculum, Norway]. Oslo: Ministry of Education. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• LP 15. (2015). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011, Reviderad 2015 [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011, Revised 2015]. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• LP14. (2014). (LP14) Grunderna för läroplanen för den grundläggande utbildningen [Core curriculum for basic education]. Helsinki: National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Luoto, J. M., Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2018). Activity formats and instructional patterns in mathematics classrooms: A comparative study of Norwegian and Finnish-Swedish lower secondary classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Margutti, P., & Drew, P. (2014). Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction. Language and Education, 28(5), 436–458. doi:10.1080/09500782.2014.898650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. doi:10.1111/bjep.1976.46.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medietilsynet. (2016). Barn og medier. Report, Retrieved from URL: https://www.medietilsynet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/barn-og-medier-undersokelser/2016_barnogmedier.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Ground-rules for mutual understanding: A social psychological approach to classroom knowledge. In B. Mayor & A. K. Pugh (Eds.), Language, communication and education (pp. 357–371). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329–344. doi:10.1177/1474904116639311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17226/9853
   Google Scholar
• Nuthall, G. (2005). The cultural myths and realities of classroom teaching and learning: A personal journey. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 895–934. doi:10.1111/tcre.2005.107.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results (Volume 1): What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016a). Global competence for an inclusive world. Paris: Author. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 - Results in focus. Paris: Author. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Global competences for an inclusive world. Program for internantional student assessment. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Olin-Scheller, C., Sahlström, F., & Tanner, M. (in press). Introduction: Smartphones in classrooms: Reading, writing and talking in rapidly changing educational spaces.
   Google Scholar
• Österlind, E. (1998). Disciplinering via frihet: elevers planering av sitt eget arbete. ( Doctoral dissertation). Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. (2005). The teacher shaping and creating dialogues in project work. Teachers and Teaching, 11(6), 519–539. doi:10.1080/13450600500293217
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F. (1999). Up the Hill Backwards. On interactional constraints and affordances for equity-constitution in the classrooms of the Swedish comprehensive school (Uppsala Studies in Education 85). Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F. (2017). Vad händer egentligen under lektionerna? In S. Hansén & L. Forsman ( redaktörer), Allmändidaktik – Vetenskap för lärare (pp. 175–197). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F., Tanner, M., & Valasmo, V. (in press). Smartphone use and student and teacher participation in plenary classroom interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., Zoido, P., & Cogan, L. (2014). Schooling matters: Opportunity to learn in PISA 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X027002004
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2015). Learning, commognition and mathematics. In D. Scott & E. ‎Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning (pp. 129–138). London: Sage‎.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470. doi:10.1080/03050060500317810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simola, H., Kauko, J., Varjo, J., Kalalahti, M., & Sahlström, F. (2017). Dynamics in education politics understanding and explaining the Finnish case. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Stein, M. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J. (2011). Interrogating video data: Systematic quantitative analysis versus micro-ethnographic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 253–258. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.563624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2016). Measures of quality through classroom observation for the sustainable development goals: Lessons from low-and-middle-income countries. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002458/245841e.pdf|
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2007). The mediating role of discoursing in activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(3), 160–177. doi:10.1080/10749030701316300
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2002). Learning and teaching for understanding: The key role of collaborative knowledge building. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints. Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 9). London: Elsevier/JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Westlund, O., & Bjur, J. (2014). Media life of the young. Young, 22(1), 21–41. doi:10.1177/1103308813512934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar