Teacher collaboration’s influence on inquiry-based science teaching methods

References

• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Badreddine, Z., & Buty, C. (2011). Discursive reconstruction of the scientific story in a teaching sequence. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 773–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boreham, N., & Morgan, C. (2004). A socio-cultural analysis of organisational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), 307–325. doi:10.1080/0305498042000260467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M. (2013). A model for understanding science teachers’ approaches to inquiry based science teaching and learning. In M. Honerød Hoveid & P. Gray (Eds.), Inquiry in science education and science teacher education (pp. 5582). Trondheim: Akademika Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M. (2016). Dimensions and modalities of inquiry-based teaching: Understanding the variety of practices. Education Inquiry, 7(4), 421–442. doi:10.3402/edui.v7.29863
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2007). Factors influencing teachers’ professional competence development. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(4), 485–501. doi:10.1080/13636820701650943
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2008). Teaching as a collective activity: Analysis, current research and implications for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 177–189. doi:10.1080/02607470802212306
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. (2008). The curriculum workshop: A place for deliberative enquiry and teacher professional learning. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 487–500. doi:10.2304/eerj.2008.7.4.487
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2013). Assessment and inquiry-based science education: Issues in policy and practice. Italy: Global Network of Science Academies (IAP) Science Education Program (SEP).
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., Ryan, C., Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, C., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., & Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship (No. EUR 26893). Brussels: European Commission – Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2007). Comparing different traditions of teaching and learning: What can we learn about teaching and learning? European Educational Research Journal on Didactics, 6(2), 135–146. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.135
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, N. (2010). Zen and the art of neriage: Facilitating consensus building in mathematics inquiry lessons through lesson study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9150-z
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, disco- very, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplat, J. (1994). Collective activities in work: Some lines of research. Le Travail Humain, 57(3), 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, N., & Grangeat, M. (2010). Designing TPD for new teachers: The role of socio-cognitive 545 conflict. In A. Tiberghien & S. Copp⃩ (Eds.), Elements for collaborative teacher development and teacher resources: France, Report for European Commission S-TEAM project (FP7) (pp. 82–89). Trondheim, Norway: NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33–59. doi:10.1080/10508400701793182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self- Regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, A., & Rogalski, J. (2005). A cross-analysis of the mathematics teacher’s activity: An example in a French 10th-grade class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1), 269–298. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-5890-6
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. (1991). Cooperative work: A conceptual framework. In J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, & J. Leplat (Eds.), Distributed decision making. Cognitive models for cooperative work (pp. 75–110). Chichester: Willey.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Valk, T., & de Jong, O. (2009). Scaffolding science teachers in open inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 829–850. doi:10.1080/09500690802287155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & David, A. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 59–82. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar