Deregulation, privatisation and marketisation of Nordic comprehensive education: social changes reflected in schooling

References

• Aarseth, H. (2015). A sound Foundation? Financial elite families and egalitarian schooling in Norway. In C. Maxwell & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Elite education: International perspectives (pp. 79–91). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aasen, P. (2003). What happened to social democratic progressivism in Scandinavia? Restructuring Education in Sweden and Norway in the 1990s. In M. Apple & P. Aasen (Eds.), The state and the politics of knowledge (pp. 109–147). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2003). Class strategies and the education market. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., & Vincent, C. (2007). Education, class fractions and the local rules of spatial relations. UrbanStudies, 44, 1175–1189. doi:10.1080/00420980701302312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S., & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatisation in public education. Educational International. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from http://download.ei-ie.org/docs/irisdocuments/research%20website%20documents/2009-00034-01-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2010). Socialisation and commercialisation in the restructuring of education and health professions in Europe: Questions of global class and gender. Current Sociology, 58, 551–569. doi:10.1177/0011392110367998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2007). Education and the commodity problem: Ethnographic investigations of creativity and performativity in Swedish Schools. London: Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2009). Making ‘right’ choices? An ethnographic account of creativity, performativity and personalised learning policy, concepts and practices. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 689–704. doi:10.1080/03054980903122267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2011). Twelve years of upper-secondary education in Sweden: The beginnings of a neo-liberal policy hegemony. Educational Review, 63, 313–327. doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.560249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends, M. (2014). The evolving landscape of school choice in the USA. In H. R. Milner IV & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 451–473). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bjordal, I. (2016). Markedsretting i en urban norsk skolekontekst: Et sosialt rettferdighetsperspektiv [Market orientation in an urban Norwegian school context: A social justice perspective]. Trondheim: Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014a). Nordic schools in a time of change. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic educational model: “A School for All” encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014b). Schools for all: A Nordic model. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic educational model. “A School for All” encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 231–239). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., Holmlund, H., & Lindahl, M. (2015). School choice and segregation: Evidence from Sweden (Working Paper No. 2015:8). IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy. Retrieved May 23, 2017, from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129385
   Google Scholar
• Borge, L.-E., & Rattsø, J. (1997). Local government grants and income tax revenue: Redistributive politics in Norway 1900–1990. Public Choice, 92, 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunar, N., & Ambrose, A. (2013). Schools, choice and reputation: Local school markets and the distribution of Symbolic capital in segregated cities. Research in Comparative & International Education, 11, 34–51. doi:10.1177/1745499916631064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevea. (2013). Ekstrem ulighed mellem privatskolerne [Extreme inequality between private schools]. København: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, V. T., & Ladenburg, J. (2012). Privatskolerne og det sociale ansvar [The private schools and the social responsibility]. København: AKF.
   Google Scholar
• Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut. (2009). Kommunernes arbejde med kvalitetsrapporter [The municipalities work with quality reports]. København: EVA.
   Google Scholar
• Dovemark, M. (2004). Ansvar, flexibilitet och valfrihet. En etnografisk studie om en skola I förändring [Responsibility, flexibility and freedom of choice. An Ethnographic study of a school in transision] (Dissertation). University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Dovemark, M. (2017). Utbildning till salu – Konkurrens differentiering och varumärke (Education for sale – Competition, differentiation and brands). Utbildning & Demokrati, 26(1), 67–86.
   Google Scholar
• Dovemark, M., & Lundström, U. (2017). Skolan och marknaden [The school and the market]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 26(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dýrfjörð, K., & Magnúsdóttir, B. R. (2016). Privatization of the early childhood education in Iceland. Research in Comparative and International Education, 11, 80–97. doi:10.1177/1745499916631062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekonomifakta. (2017). Retrieved May 31, 2017, from http://www.ekonomifakta.se/Fakta/Valfarden-i-privat-regi/Skolan-i-privat-regi/Elever-i-friskola/
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (Ed.). (1996). Utbildningspolitiskt systemskifte? [Change of the education polity system?]. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Erixon Arreman, I., & Holm, A.-S. (2011a). Privatisation of Public Education? The emergence of independent upper secondary schools in Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 26, 225–242. doi:10.1080/02680939.2010.502701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon Arreman, I., & Holm, A.-S. (2011b). School as “Edu-business”: Four “serious players” in the Swedish upper secondary school market. Education Inquiry, 2, 637–664.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fjellman, A.-M. (2017). Differentiering genom reglerad marknadsanpassning: Uppkomsten av en regional skolmarknad [Differentiation through regulated market adjustment: The emergence of a regional school market]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 6(1), 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Government Proposition. (1991/92:95). Om valfrihet och fristående skolor [About freedom of choice and free schools]. Stockholm: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Government Proposition. (1992/93:230). Valfrihet i skolan [Freedom of choice in schools]. Stockholm: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E., Sörlin, S., & Vlachos, J. (2016). Policyidéerför svensk skola [Policy ideas for Swedish school]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, B. (2013). Transnational influence and educational policy in Iceland. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic model? (pp. 49–60). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, B., & Lárusdottir, H. (2014). Instructional leadership in compulsory schools in Iceland and the role of school principals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(5), 583–603. doi:10.1080/00313831.2014.965788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, A.-S. (2017). En skolkoncerns uppgång och fall [The rise and fall of a school company]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 26(1), 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Imsen, G., & Volckmar, N. (2014). The Norwegian school for all: Historical emergence and neoliberal confrontation. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic educational model. “A School for All” encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 35–55). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jóhannesson, I. A., Lindblad, S., & Simola, H. (2002). An inevitable progress? Educational restructuring in Finland, Iceland and Sweden at the turn of the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 325−339. doi:10.1080/0031383022000005706
   Google Scholar
• Kauko, J., & Salokangas, M. (2015). The evaluation and steering of English academy schools through inspection and examinations: National visions and local practices. British Educational Research Journal, 41, 1108–1124. doi:10.1002/berj.3184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauko, J., & Varjo, J. (2008). Age of indicators: Changes in the Finnish education policy agenda. European Educational Research Journal, 7, 219–231. doi:10.2304/eerj.2008.7.2.219
   Google Scholar
• Kjartansson, H. S. (2008). Einstaklings- og markaðshyggja í sókn [Advancement of individualism and marketization]. In L. Guttormsson (Ed.), Almenningsfræðals á Íslandi 1880-2007 [Basic education in Iceland 1880–2007] (Vol. II, pp. 237–250). Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosunen, S. (2016). Families and the social space of school choice in Urban Finland (Dissertation). Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Studies in Educational Sciences 267, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kosunen, S., Bernelius, V., Seppänen, P., & Porkka, M. (2016). School choice to lower-secondary schools and mechanisms of segregation in urban Finland. Urban Education, 1–28. doi:10.1177/0042085916666933
   Google Scholar
• Kosunen, S., Seppänen, P., & Bernelius, V. (2016). Naapurustojen segregaatio ja kaupunkilaisperheiden eriytyvät kouluvalintastrategiat [Neighbourhood segregation and the differentiated school choice strategies of urban families]. Kasvatus (The Finnish Journal of Education), 47, 230–244.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J. (1997). Public sector reform rationale, trends and problems. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lärarnas Tidning. (2016). Retrieved February 17, 2017, from http://lararnastidning.se/barn-till-hogutbildade-samlas-pa-friskolor/
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralisation, deregulation, quasi-markets – And then what? Journal of Education Policy, 17, 687–697. doi:10.1080/0268093022000032328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2017). Marketization of the urban educational space. In W. T. Pink & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Second international handbook of urban education (pp. 671–693). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational marketization the Swedish way. Education Inquiry, 4(3). doi:10.3402/edui.v4i3.22620
   Google Scholar
• Machin, S., & Salvanes, K. G. (2016). Valuing school quality via a school choice reform. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 118, 3–24. doi:10.1111/sjoe.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnúsdóttir, B., & Auðardóttir, A. (forthcoming). Emerging class divide in the urban educational landscape of Iceland: Parental choices of residences and schools in Reykjavík. Scandinavian Journal of Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ministeriet for Børn, Undervisning og Ligestilling. (2016). Elever i grundskolen, 2015/16. København: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernising education: New Public Management reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45, 336–353. doi:10.1080/00220620.2013.822353
   Google Scholar
• Oberti, M. (2007). L’école dans la ville [School in the city]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östh, J., Andersson, E., & Malmberg, B. (2013). School choice and increasing performance differences: A counterfactual approach. Urban Studies, 50, 407–425. doi:10.1177/0042098012452322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., & Grek, S. (2012). Governing through learning. school self-evaluation as a knowledge-based regulatory tool. Recherches Sociologiques Et Anthropologiques, 43(2), 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organisations forget? Public Administration, 87, 198–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, S., Whitty, G., Edwards, T., & Wigfall, V. (2010). Education and the Middle-class. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rambøll Management. (2007). Evaluering af mere frit skolevalg [Evaluation of free school choice]. København: Undervisningsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Rangvid, B. S. (2010). School Choice, universal vouchers and native flight out of local public schools. European Sociological Review, 26, 319–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, P. (2012). The politics of user satisfaction surveys in school policy. Suomen Kasvatustieteellinen Seura [The Finnish Educational Research Association]. Kasvatusalan Tutkimuksia, 59, 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D., & Lucey, H. (2004). Stigmatised choices: Social class, social exclusion and secondary school markets in the inner city. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12, 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Reeh, N. (2008). Den danske stat og de frie skolers frihed – I 1855 og 2005 [The Danish state and the freedom of the free school – In 1855 and 2005] (pp. 82–98). Århus: Selskabet for Skole- og Uddannelseshistorie.
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, R., Kallo, J., & Hokka, S. (2004). Liian innokas mukautumaan? OECD: Nkoulutuspolitiikka ja Suomen vastauksia [Too eager to comply? Finnish answers to OECD’s education policy]. Kasvatus (Education), 35, 34–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, R., & Simola, H. (2010). Vasten valtavirtaa: Kontingenssi, polkuriippuvuus ja konvergenssi suomalaisen perusopetuksen laadunarviointimallin kehityskuluissa [Against the mainstream: Contingency, path dependency and convergency in the trajectories of the Finnish basic education evaluation model]. Hallinnon Tutkimus (Administration Research), 29, 318–334.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P. (2003). Patterns of “public-school markets” in the Finnish comprehensive school from a comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 513–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P. (2006). Kouluvalintapolitiikka perusopetuksessa. Suomalaiskaupunkien koulumarkkinat kansainvälisessä valossa [School choice policy in comprehensive schooling. school markets of Finnish cities in the international perspective] (Research in Educational Sciences 26). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P., Kalalahti, M., Rinne, R., & Simola, H. (Eds.). (2015). Lohkoutuva peruskoulu – Perheiden kouluvalinnat, yhteiskuntaluokat ja koulutuspolitiikka [Segmenting comprehensive school: School choices, social classes and education politics]. In Research in educational sciences 68. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University, Finnish Education Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P., & Rinne, R. (2015). Suomalainen yhtenäiskoulu ylikansallisen koulupolitiikan paineissa [Finnish comprehensive school under pressures of supernational education policy]. In P. Seppänen, M. Kalalahti, R. Rinne, & H. Simola (Eds.), Lohkoutuva peruskoulu – Perheiden kouluvalinnat, yhteiskuntaluokat ja koulutuspolitiikka [Segmenting comprehensive school: School choices, social classes and education politics] (pp. 23–58). Research in Educational Sciences 68. Jyväskylä: Finnish Education Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P., Rinne, R., & Sairanen, V. (2012). Suomalaisen yhtenäiskoulun eriytyvät koulutiet. Oppilasvalikointi perusopetuksessa, esimerkkinä Turun koulumarkkinat [Segregating routes in Finnish comprehensive schooling. Pupil selection in basic education, a case of local school markets in Turku]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka (Social and Public Policy), 77, 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurðardóttir, A. K., Guðjónsdóttir, H., & Karlsdóttir, J. (2014). The development of a school for all in Iceland: Equality, threats and political conditions. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic educational model: “A School for All” encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 95–116). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H., Kauko, J., Varjo, J., Kalalahti, M., & Sahlström, F. (2017). Dynamics in Education Politics. Understanding and explaining the Finnish case. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H., Rinne, R., Varjo, J., & Kauko, J. (2013). The Paradox of the Education Race: How to win the ranking game by sailing to headwind. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 612–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. (Ed.). (2016). Mot en ny skandinavisk velferdsmodell? Konsekvenser av ideell, kommersiell og offentlig tjenesteyting for aktivt medborgerskap [Towards a new Scandinavian welfare model? Consequences of non-profit, commercial and public services for active citizenship]. Rapport 01:2016. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H., & Saglie, J. (Eds.). (2017). Promoting active citizenship. Markets and choice in Scandinavian welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1990). Assessment, technology and the quality revolution. In T. Schuler (Ed.), World yearbook of education 1990: Assessment and evaluation (pp. 41–55). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE. (2014). Swedish national agency of education (Rapport 410). Retrieved March 20, 2017, from https://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/publikationer/visa-enskild-publikation?
   Google Scholar
• Soriano, F. H., & Mulatero, F. (2010). Knowledge policy in the EU: From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1, 289–302.
   Google Scholar
• Svare, J., & Dabic, M. (2017). Evolution of the knowledge economy: A historical perspective with an application to the case of Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O., Aasen, P., & Mediås, O. A. (2004). From collectivism to individualism? Education as nation building in a Scandinavian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 141–158. doi:10.1080/0031383042000198558
   Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O., & Mediås, O. A. (2003). Grunnskolen som nasjonsbygger: Fra statpietisme til nyliberalisme [Comprehensive school as nationbuilding: From state pietism to neoliberalism]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag as.
   Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O., MediåS, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic Model in Education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 245–283. doi:10.1080/00313830600743274
   Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O., & Tønnesen, R. T. (1992). Dansk utdanningspolitikk under Bertel Haarder 1982–1992 [Danish education policy under Bertel Haarder 1982–1992]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Temmes, M. (1998). Finland and new public management. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64(3), 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undervisningsministeriet. (2014). Grundskoleelevernes sociale baggrund, 2012/2013 [Primary school students’ social background]. København: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Undervisningsministeriet. (2017). Frit skolevalg. Hovedrapport. København: Epinion.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zanten, A. (2009). Choisir son école: Stratégies familiales et médiations locales [Choosing a school: Family strategies and local mediations]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Varjo, J. (2007). Kilpailukykyvaltion koululainsäädännön rakentuminen. Suomen eduskunta ja 1990-luvun koulutuspoliittinen käänne [Drafting education legislation for the competitive state. The Parliament of Finland and the 1990s change in education policy] (Dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinki. Department of Education. Research Report 209.
   Google Scholar
• Varjo, J., Rinne, R., & Simola, H. (2016). Arvioida ja hallita: Perään katsomisesta informaatio-ohjaukseen suomalaisessa koulupolitiikassa [To evaluate and rule: From looking after to information steering in Finnish education policy]. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Volckmar, N. (2008). Knowledge and Solidarity: The Norwegian social-democratic school project in a period of change, 1945–2000. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 1–15. doi:10.1080/00313830701786560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volckmar, N. (2010). En skole for alle” og privatisering - en analyse av de skandinaviske landenes privatiseringspolitikk [A School for all” and privatisation – An investigation of privatisation in Scandinavian education policy]. Uddannelseshistorie 2010. Fællesskab og elite: Skolen mellem det offentlige og private, 44, 33–49 ( Århus: Selskabet for Skole- og Uddannelseshistorie).
   Google Scholar
• Volckmar, N., & Wiborg, S. (2014). A social democratic response to market-led education policies: Concession or rejection? In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic educational model. “A School for All” encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 117–131). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Welle-Strand, A., & Tjeldvoll, A. (2002). The Norwegian unified school – A paradise lost? Journal of Education Policy, 17, 673–686. doi:10.1080/0268093022000032319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiborg, S. (2013). Neo-liberalism and universal state education: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980–2011. Comparative Education, 49, 407–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Hansen, K., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Causes of educational segregation in Sweden – School choice or residential segregation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22, 23–44. doi:10.1080/13803611.2016.1178589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar