Critical thinking in national tests across four subjects in Swedish compulsory school

References

• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Broman, A. (2009). Att göra en demokrat?: Demokratisk socialisation i den svenska gymnasieskolan (doctoral dissertation). Karlstads universitet, Karlstad.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, P., Alvén, F., Yngvéus, C. A., & Rosenlund, D. (2015). Historical consciousness and historical thinking reflected in large-scale assessment in Sweden. In K.Ercikan & P.Seixas (Eds.), New directions in assessing historical thinking (pp. 171–182). New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32(1), 81–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1985a). Critical thinking and the curriculum. National Forum, 65(1), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1985b). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016). A new skills agenda for Europe: Working together to strengthen human capital, employability and competitiveness. Retrieved fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1223
   Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. (2005). An R and S-plus® companion to multivariate analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. Fullerton: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., … Shanahan, C., Project READI. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, J. (2000). Critical thinking and the academic vocational divide. Curriculum Journal, 11(2), 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Herrenkohl, L. R., & Cornelius, L. (2013). Investigating elementary students’ scientific and historical argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(22), 413–461.
   Google Scholar
• Hjort, S. (2014). Kritiskt tänkande i klassrummet: En studie av didaktiska val och manifesterat kritiskt tänkande i samhällskunskaps-och filosofiundervisning ( Doctoral dissertation). Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. G., Wieman, C. E., & Bonn, D. A. (2015). Teaching critical thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(36), 11199–11204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, K. G. (2014). Historia, historiedidaktik och historiekultur-teori och perspektiv. In K. G.I Karlsson&U.Zander (Eds.), Historien är närvarande: Historiedidaktik som teori och tillämpning (pp. 13–89). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, E., Säljö, R., & Östman, L. (2013). Scientific literacy: Teori och praktik. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. E. (1981). Critical thinking and education. New York: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. E. (1990a). Critical thinking and subject specificity: A reply to Ennis. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. E. (1990b). Teaching critical thinking: Dialogue and dialectic. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J. (2011). Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: A continuing debate. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 261–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., Trong, K. L., & Sainsbury, M. (2009). PIRLS 2011 assessment framework. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Lynch School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nakazawa, M. (2011). R practice: Factor analysis. Retrieved fromhttp://minato.sip21c.org/swtips/factor-in-R.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. In G. Guest&K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–162). Lanham: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, T., Sandberg, K., & Vikström, L. (2014). Digitala primärkällor i historieundervisningen: en utmaning för elevers historiska tänkande och historiska empati. Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, (2), 208–245.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren,T., Vinterek, M., Thorp, R., & Taylor, M. (2017). Promoting a historiographic Gaze through multiperspectivity in history teaching. In H. Å. Elmersjö, A. Clark, & A. &. M. Vinterek (Eds.), International perspectives on teaching rival histories: Pedagogical responses to contested narratives and the history wars (pp. 207–228). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015a). Intervention and research protocol for OECD project on assessing progression in creative and critical thinking skills in education. EDU/CERI/CD(2015)19.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015b). Assessing progression in creative and critical thinking skills in education. Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/assessingprogressionincreativeandcriticalthinkingskillsineducation.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound?Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K.Abell & N. G.Lederman (Eds.), Handbook on research of science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenlund, D. (2016). History education as content, methods or orientation?: A study of curriculum prescriptions, teacher-made tasks and student strategies (Doctoral dissertation). Lunds universitet, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Royalty, J. (1995). The generalizability of critical thinking: Paranormal beliefs versus statistical reasoning. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156(4), 477–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sá, W. C., Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 497–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, J., & Wendell, J. (2016). Historical thinking about sources in the context of a standards-based curriculum: A Swedish case. The Curriculum Journal, 27(4), 479–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (2013). Rationality redeemed?: Further dialogues on an educational ideal. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre. Stockholm: Ordförrådet AB.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2013a). Nationellt ämnesprov i historia, årskurs 9, 2012/2013. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2013b). Nationellt ämnesprov i svenska, årskurs 9, 2012/2013. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2013c). Nationellt ämnesprov i fysik, årskurs 9, 2012/2013. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2013d). Ämnesprov i matematik, årskurs 9, 2012/2013. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2002). Are there domain–Specific thinking skills?Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(2), 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solon, T. (2007). Generic critical thinking infusion and course content learning in introductory psychology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(2), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhag, S. (2010). Betyget i matematik: Vad ger grundskolans matematikbetyg för information? ( Doctoral dissertation). Uppsala universitet, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: a study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyndhamn, A. K. (2013). Tänka fritt, tänka rätt. En studie om värdeöverföring och kritiskt tänkande i gymnasieskolans undervisning (Doctoral dissertation). Göteborgs universitet, Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, N. (2009). The minimum sample size in factor analysis. Retrieved fromhttps://www.encorewiki.org/display/~nzhao/The+Minimum+Sample+Size+in+Factor+Analysis
   Google Scholar